To me, it sounds like this dataset is orphaned in the wrong usercat. You need
to temporary delete the alias to the correct usercat; delete the cluster with
the catalog parameter (or define the alias to the wrong usercat before the
delete); finally define the alias back to the correct usercat.
I'm sure we can help you but I suspect a phone call will be needed. Why
don't you email me directly and I can give you my direct phone number. I
promise not to push any vendor tool on you! I'm sure we can get to the
bottom of this by using LISTCAT, perhaps some VTOC lists, some prints of
your
If you use the CATALOG(xxx) parameter, you don't need to delete or
redefine the alias.
Bruce Richardson wrote:
To me, it sounds like this dataset is orphaned in the wrong usercat. You need
to temporary delete the alias to the correct usercat; delete the cluster with
the catalog parameter (or
We really appreciate you taking the time to enlighten us.
Could you comment on the observation that ICC consoles can be expected
to be offline in various start up scenarios?
For example, z/os 1.7 POR, z/os 1.9 POR, 'Rolling IPL' for those two?
Thanks!!
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Be sure you understand the installation's security rules. I can't
believe that there wouldn't be naming conventions in place that would
allow datasets to be named so as to get appropriate access protection
even for test/training/non-production datasets. If you are somehow
dealing with a
Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 09/24/2008
at 11:22 PM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
More to the point, century year that is not a mod 400 year is not a leap
year.
Not quite, but the adjustment won't be in my lifetime.
Well, actually, quite. The
2008/10/9 Bernd Oppolzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A variable which is listed in the storage offset listing as 0(r13)
actually never is held in storage, but it resides in a register all the time.
0(r13) simply means that no storage is allocated for this variable (this
is not very nice, I asked the
Thanks for the responses, guys. Looking closer at the pseudo assembly
listing revealed that the compiler was stuffing this variable at +FC into the
DSA into a variable that it decided to call #SPILL2. Since the compiler
leaves
no comments behind, at least the line numbers can be used to see
I will be out of the office starting 04/10/2008 and will not return until
12/10/2008.
Estarei ausente com acesso restrito a e-mail. Retornarei em 12/Outubro.
Para assuntos urgentes, favor contatar minha gerente Cintia Lima no ramal
6919. Obrigado.
I am out of office with restrict access to
Does anybody know that this really does? I'm running a C++ program in batch.
Basically, it is a program which reads information from a network connection
and is writing it out to a tape dataset. I don't have the source. For those
interested, it is the todsn program in the Co:Z package from
Just finished a roll out of a new IODF/IOCDS across all five of my
active LPAR's. All the displays except one are as expected. The one odd
display is on the HMC Activation Profile for the POR profile.
The list of IOCDS's look good, but the 'current active' does not agree
with any of the other
I wouldn't expect them to match if dynamic activity has take place since the
last POR. I believe the IOCDS is write protected for the life of the POR.
What happened when you built the new IOCDS (i.e., wrote it out to the SE)?
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:41:44 -0700, Neubert, Kevin wrote:
I wouldn't expect them to match if dynamic activity has take place since the
last POR. I believe the IOCDS is write protected for the life of the POR.
What
happened when you built the new IOCDS (i.e., wrote it out to the SE)?
I don't
Return code zero - nothing unexpected.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Neubert, Kevin
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 5:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IOCDS Question
I wouldn't expect them to match if dynamic
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:41:36 -0500, John McKown wrote:
Does anybody know that this really does? I'm running a C++ program in batch.
Basically, it is a program which reads information from a network connection
and is writing it out to a tape dataset. I don't have the source. For those
interested,
I will be out of the office starting 10/09/2008 and will not return until
10/14/2008.
I will be out of the office on Friday, October 10th and Monday, October
13th. I will return on Tuesday, October 14th. Thanks.
**
The information contained in this communication is confidential,
I'm looking for previous relase of System z Connectivity Handbook
SG24-5444. Now it's SG24-5444-08 and does not include any information
regarding z/900. Redbook web page does show me only the latest issue.
How can I find old release of the book?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank
Hi I replied yesterday on the Google group forum for IBMMAIN but saw no
posting when reading the Listserv postings today
What I have to say is if the VSAM is definitely uncataloged then the following
will work
) Run an IEHLIST LISTVTOC of the volume on which the VSAm DS resides
2) Check that
Radoslaw,
only latest redbooks are available (or draft, if it is more fresh).
The oldest I have is -05, I will send it to you privately.
Marian Gasparovic
IBM Slovakia
2008/10/9 R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm looking for previous relase of System z Connectivity Handbook
SG24-5444. Now it's
A variable which is listed in the storage offset listing as 0(r13)
actually never is held in storage, but it resides in a register all the time.
0(r13) simply means that no storage is allocated for this variable (this
is not very nice, I asked the compiler people several times to fix this.
Some
BTW:
ad
if you are in Europe and you want me to hold a class on such
things in German or English, please contact me offline.
/ad
Kind regards
Bernd
Am Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2008 09:47 schrieb Bernd Oppolzer:
A variable which is listed in the storage offset listing as 0(r13)
actually
I sent to personal email a copy of -02 and 04 of book.
Why IBM remove them from web site Some good information can be
missed from old releases.
Carlos
R.S. escreveu:
I'm looking for previous relase of System z Connectivity Handbook
SG24-5444. Now it's SG24-5444-08 and does not include
Ram Balaji wrote:
Is there any free?Mainframe(JCL,CICS) simulators available for desktop PC?
The z390 Portable Mainframe Assembler and Emulator open source J2SE java
based tool includes TN3270 client server emulation over TCP/IP sockets and
there is support for EXEC CICS assembler
Don Higgins wrote:
Come to the next SHARE conference in Austin TX for session on z390
Tuesday, March 3, 2009 8:00 with update on what's new including support for
open source Structured Programming Extensions (SPE's) for conditional macro
code and Structured Programming Macros (SPM's) all
Although not about IBM mainframes, I think this article is interesting. It
does touch, peripherally on why mainframes as a class continue to exist.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/08/unisys_clearpath_kickers/
--
John
--
Ram,
I was also in the Outsourcing business for 10 years so here comes my opinion :
a) You have to speak/find the Software support staff for the Computer that
you are working on
b) Tell them what you want to do and then ask them, what do they think you
should do.
They would help you, if only
First you need to check all the components. The LISTCAT is listing the BCS.
You should list the VVDS of the volume where the DATA and INDEX
components are located. Check if the entries are there and if they point to
the right catalog. Also, using 3.4 and specifying the VOLSER, see if the
27 matches
Mail list logo
