I got it. thanks Chris and Guy :)
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
Guy
Thanks for the correction. Actually it's a correction to my 8-year old
document. I just didn't bother to check this time around - nor, it would
appear, ever since I wrote it! I
Hi All,
I am new to Mainframe (get to learn Mainframe about 3 months ago). I
find it amazing and interesting exploring the mf world. But I have met
many problems as well. Lucky to find here to put my questions^
One of them is: How to add (or remove) libraries to an existed dataset
concatenation?
2009-10-09 Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com:
I have yet to see
COBOL code generation that takes account of potential superscalar
pipeline interruptions. Why is that?
A perhaps more interesting related question is why IBM's languages,
including COBOL, seem to continue to have
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:23:45 +0800 bububut bubu...@gmail.com wrote:
:I am new to Mainframe (get to learn Mainframe about 3 months ago). I
:find it amazing and interesting exploring the mf world. But I have met
:many problems as well. Lucky to find here to put my questions^
:One of them is: How
bububut wrote:
Hi All,
I am new to Mainframe (get to learn Mainframe about 3 months ago). I
find it amazing and interesting exploring the mf world. But I have met
many problems as well. Lucky to find here to put my questions^
One of them is: How to add (or remove) libraries to an existed
Excellant Response Steve
bububut wrote:
Hi All,
I am new to Mainframe (get to learn Mainframe about 3 months ago). I
find it amazing and interesting exploring the mf world. But I have met
many problems as well. Lucky to find here to put my questions^
One of them is: How to add (or
Tony Harminc writes:
| A perhaps more interesting related question is why IBM's
| languages, including COBOL, seem to continue to have
| their own code generation, rather than using a GCC-like
| scheme of language-specific front end, followed by
| common code generation and optimization back
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:10:46 +, john gilmore wrote:
but PL/l multitasking and asynchronous I/O, which were among the glories of
the language, have been lost, folded into their watered-down C analogues.
Do you mean that the specification of the language was regressed?
Astonishing!
-- gil
http://gigaom.com/2009/10/10/when-cloud-fails-t-mobile-microsoft-lose-sidekick-customer-data/
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/10/t-mobile-sidekick-disaster-microsofts-servers-crashed-and-they-dont-have-a-backup/
Here's an article saying Cloud computing is better than your data center, I
Paul Gilmartin wrote (of PL/I):
| Do you mean that the specification of the language was
| regressed? Astonishing!
Indeed it was! It was for many years possible to write such things as
write file(filenameA) . . . event(eventnameA) ;
. . .
. . .
write file(filenameB) . . .
At DR site, we are running our z/OS second level to z/VM. z/OS would not start
at all until we changed our SQA=(10,1800) to SQA=(32,256) in IEASYSxx and added
INITSQA 0064K 8192K in our LOADxx. That allowed us to IPL our z/OS system but
now our largest CICS region is getting an 878-10 and
Change INITSQA as small as needed to get you up. Then you are going to
have to massage SQA to find a sweet spot. I'd try SQA=(16,1500).
Doug Fuerst
Crabtree, Anne D wrote:
At DR site, we are running our z/OS second level to z/VM. z/OS would not start
at all until we changed our
Does it happen only at DR? It look like something is stilling you some SQA
slots. One of these are uninitialized DASD. Messages generated during NIP
are stored in SQA.
ITschak
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Doug Fuerst d...@bkassociates.net wrote:
Change INITSQA as small as needed to get you
Yes, only happens at DR. We only initialized packs we are using for the test.
There are alot of our addresses that are just offline here. When you say
change INITSQA to as small as needed, any suggestions? Should I drastically
reduce it from the 8M to say 2M and see if it will ipl? Don't
How much storage is assigned to the Virtual machine where your z/os is
running in ?
2009/10/11 Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov
At DR site, we are running our z/OS second level to z/VM. z/OS would not
start at all until we changed our SQA=(10,1800) to SQA=(32,256) in IEASYSxx
and
I think a INITSQA 0064K 0256K should be sufficient for IPL (NIP)
2009/10/11 Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov
At DR site, we are running our z/OS second level to z/VM. z/OS would not
start at all until we changed our SQA=(10,1800) to SQA=(32,256) in IEASYSxx
and added INITSQA 0064K
That sounds about right
Doug
Dick de Groot wrote:
I think a INITSQA 0064K 0256K should be sufficient for IPL (NIP)
2009/10/11 Crabtree, Anne D anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov
At DR site, we are running our z/OS second level to z/VM. z/OS would not
start at all until we changed our SQA=(10,1800)
5120M
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Dick de Groot
Sent: Sun 10/11/2009 2:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CICS problem at DR
How much storage is assigned to the Virtual machine where your z/os is
running in ?
2009/10/11 Crabtree,
Hi,
APAR PK93289 closed with PTF UK50610 available.
The z/OSMF User's Guide has been revised. For a downloadable PDF, see the
z/OSMF product Web site:
http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/zosmf/
Bette Brody (IBM WSC) highly recommended in her session on z/OSMF at zExpo that
anyone interested
On 11 Oct 2009 05:34:17 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
2009-10-09 Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com:
I have yet to see
COBOL code generation that takes account of potential superscalar
pipeline interruptions. Why is that?
A perhaps more interesting related question
The INITSQA value's are added to the default initial amount (sqa- 8 x 64k
blocks , esqa 35 x 64k blocks at IPL). What I should recommend is specify in
loadxx for INITSQA 256k 256k and leave your IEASYSxx value for SQA
unchanged.
And also check that you IPL with CLPA !
IF the ipl fails during NIP
On 9 Oct 2009 12:51:02 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
for those who care about such things, I just received thin in my inbox
I don't think I have ever gotten such a message from Microsoft. So
far as I know their knowledge base complete with downloadable fixes is
available
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:16:19 -0500, Dana dmit...@shazam.net wrote:
What else needs to be setup to get this to work? I ran a job with that and
the output is sitting in the output queue with DEST IP.The only
reference I can find to this in any manuals is in the JCL reference under
DEST=. Not a
If the US government is migrating away from IBM mainframes, they must have
found something more expensive :-)
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.comwrote:
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
If the US government is migrating away from IBM mainframes, they must
have
found something more expensive :-)
More reliable voters. :-|
-jc-
Since when does the U.S. House of Representatives mean all of Washington, D.C.?
More importantly, since when is $730,000 much of a data center?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 07:57:38 -0700, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
If it helped DB2, it should help you. Add this to DIAGxx:
Vsm UseZosV1R9Rules(NO) /* Use faster GETMAIN/FREEMAIN*/
--
Ed,
You're right -- specifying this will speed up ANY allocation, although the most
Thanks a lot for all your support!
Hi Steve - I'm now in Shanghai, China and yes I'm talking about zOS.
For your better understanding, I'm following the steps listed here:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/sdsf/tools/sdsfrexx.html
in step 2, it says Concatenate the panel data set
Hi Wei,
Once ISPF libraries have been allocated (ISPMLIB, ISPPLIB etc) you can't change
what's allocated to those DDNAMEs. However, you can add libraries that are
searched ahead of those libraries by doing something like this:
address ispexec LIBDEF ISPPLIB DATASET ID('MY.DSN') STACK
I
If the intent is to make a permanent change for one user, or a subset of
users, there are two ways this is typically done:
(1) Define additional logon procs with the appropriately different DD
statements, or
(2) put the minimal possible allocations in the logon proc and have the
logon proc EXEC
bububut wrote:
Thanks a lot for all your support!
Hi Steve - I'm now in Shanghai, China and yes I'm talking about zOS.
For your better understanding, I'm following the steps listed here:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/sdsf/tools/sdsfrexx.html
in step 2, it says Concatenate
I will be out of the office starting 10/11/2009 and will not return until
10/13/2009.
I will be out of the office on Monday, October 12, and will return on
Tuesday, October 13. Thanks.
HCSC Company Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication is confidential, private,
32 matches
Mail list logo
