DDCONS does not do I/O, it only consolidates SMF I/O records, costing (much)
CPU and elapstime to produce the records, but it will not add I/O counts to
the step.
Yep, I understand it accumulates all the interval counts for a given DDname and
device and writes only one entry with the total
Ugh.. I think it would just be easier to re-type the command!
Rob Schramm
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:20 PM Paul Gilmartin
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
(Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: AW: trimmed.)
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 17:48:13 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
Well, as I wrote, the
Hi Folks,
I have attempted (i.e. begun) to make available on www.cbttape.org
some XMIT-format file viewers for the PC. You can get to the proper
screen from the cbttape.org Home Page by either clicking on XMIT Manager
(on the left side) and going to the new clicker under Other XMIT
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 15:27:27 -0400, Sam Golob wrote:
Many people want to view CBT Tape files on the PC. We are trying
to make it easier for them.
Is there anything for us who are not afflcted with PCs and their pervasive OS?
A few years ago, I heard of a Java implementation, UnXMIT, IIRC.
z/OS Communications Server: IP Sockets Application Programming Interface
Guide and Reference
SC27-3660-00
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v
2r1.hala001/sam745.htm
I'm trying to run up this sample, for which there is no supplied JCL.
I've compiled,
Hey Tom,
Read your article. VERY nice I must say!
I know this is from 2012, so I guess now with z/OS 2.1 the issue below has
been fixed, right? Now each ULOG session has its own ID if I recall it
correctly
SDSF also has an issue with multiple logon. A user logged on to SYSA goes
into SDSF
Do you run CA Allocate on the offending system ?
Jim McAlpine
On 2 Jun 2015 23:10, John Norgauer jcnorga...@ucdavis.edu wrote:
My sandbox LPAR is not having the abends. They are occurring on a D/R
LPAR. The plot thickens.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Do you have SAS and MXG at your shop? If so, then the MXG.SOURCLIB will
have information on what you are looking at.
No, we don't.
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
DDCONS does not do I/O, it only consolidates SMF I/O records, costing (much)
CPU and elapstime to produce the records, but it will not add I/O counts to the
step.
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Hunkeler
On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 05:48:58 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
And lastly, I would send in a RCF and ask IBM to add a JCL example to this
section of the book.
Do they provide a makefile?
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
On 6/3/2015 8:46 AM, Givens, Dennis W. wrote:
Yes by DEFAULT SDSF sets the console id to the userid but you can changed the
console ID for each system using the OPTIONS from SDSF main panel.
Dennis,
This only works if you have a non-shared ISPF profile, which is not a
good idea. If you
On 6/3/2015 4:36 AM, Lucas Rosalen wrote:
Hey Tom,
Read your article. VERY nice I must say!
I know this is from 2012, so I guess now with z/OS 2.1 the issue below has
been fixed, right? Now each ULOG session has its own ID if I recall it
correctly
SDSF also has an issue with multiple
Do you also see subtype 5 (Job termination)?
Yes, but they are not of interest for the question at hand.
What is your DDCONS and INTERVAL setting?
DDCONS is what I was missing, well actually, I forgot about it. Thanks for the
reminder.
We do have DDCONS(NO)
--
Peter Hunkeler
Peter,
Do you have SAS and MXG at your shop? If so, then the MXG.SOURCLIB will
have information on what you are looking at.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015
I will see if I can dig up some C compile/Lnk JCL.
Second, if you have not done so, you might join the TCPIP list and see if
someone has the JCL setup you need.
To join go to this URL
TCPIP To subscribe, send mail to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the
command (paste it!) in the e-mail
Q1-Q2 Interval records are only for the interval in question and *ARE NOT*
accumulated separately. The accumulation is shown in the subtype 4 and subtype
5.
Q3. According to the SMF manual the answer is YES.
quote
The termination exit (IEFACTRT) receives control on the normal or abnormal
The following is required in the link;
INCLUDE SYSLIB(EDCMTFS)
From: Steve Austin steve.aus...@macro4.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 11:57 AM
Subject: IBM Multitasking C socket sample program
z/OS Communications Server: IP Sockets Application
Thanks Lizette,
I now have it working with INCLUDE SYSLIB(EDCMTFS) in the link for
MTCCSUB.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: 03 June 2015 13:49
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM
Yes by DEFAULT SDSF sets the console id to the userid but you can changed the
console ID for each system using the OPTIONS from SDSF main panel.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lucas Rosalen
Sent: Wednesday, June 03,
Please bear with me; I never had to dig into this detail on step end EXCP SMF
reporting.
I'm analysing a perfomance issue with long running (35 hours) a batch job.
Looking at JESYSMSG, I stumbled across information that our IEFACTRT exit
writes at step end. There is one step that seamed to do
Peter Hunkeler wrote:
I'm analysing a perfomance issue with long running (35 hours) a batch job.
Looking at JESYSMSG, I stumbled across information that our IEFACTRT exit
writes at step end. There is one step that seamed to do millions of I/Os
against STEPLIB. STEPLIB is a two DSN
Melissa,
Can you contact me off list and I will get the proper resources
working with you to sort this out. I have some ideas but with the limited
information available I do not want to guess. As you may have guessed I am
with EMC and part of the Mainframe team specifically the
On 6/3/2015 9:58 AM, Thomas Conley wrote:
On 6/3/2015 4:36 AM, Lucas Rosalen wrote:
Hey Tom,
Read your article. VERY nice I must say!
I know this is from 2012, so I guess now with z/OS 2.1 the issue below
has
been fixed, right? Now each ULOG session has its own ID if I recall it
correctly
Hi,
I am getting a S0C1 debugging my program under TESTAUTH when I do a Where to
see where I bombed It display's a 31 bit private address with the message
not whitin any program extents it look close to an area I did a storage
obtain sp=0 I thought adding a dsn LRECL=133 RECFM=FBM to SYSUDUMP
Charles Mills wrote:
http://nyti.ms/1M4Plu5
From that page: 'To receive his severance bonus, he said, “I had to make sure
they were doing my job correctly.”'
Oh f*cking sh*t! And that happens [giving priority to foreigners] in the land
of freedom just because of a lame legal loophole?
The
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSFKSJ_8.0.0/com.ibm.mq.adm.doc/q022070_.htm?lang=en
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:51 PM Meenakshi, Vinoth - CW
vinoth.meenak...@bestbuy.com wrote:
Sure Lizette and this was a much needed article.
Thanks..!
Samat
http://nyti.ms/1M4Plu5
Charles
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Can you use the LIST subcommand to display R14 or to chain through save
areas to see how you got to the outside address?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of michealbutz
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:27 AM
To:
28 matches
Mail list logo
