According to the manual, you can configure them to be connected apparently
without wires. I believe it does the route internally, but I can't really tell
from the manual. There is probably a better manual because I seem to be seeing
just the overview, bur it does appear to not need any
Starting with IBM Open Enterprise SDK for Python v3.11 with APAR PH52983, when
accompanied with z/OS 2.4 or 2.5 APAR OA63406, Python applications will become
eligible for execution on zIIP processors as described in
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/authorized-use-table.
Tom,
This reminds me of the VSAM-XA almost disaster of the early to
mid 1990s.
Let me make this short and sweet. IBM called a meeting of
developers in San Jose. DFP said what they were wanting to do
with VSAM-XA. I brought to the manager's attention (I think it
was Yates) that the
Je suis absent le 22 juin 2023.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Thank you all for your input! The reason for the question is that IBM
is consdering removing the CHKPT macro and is wondering if it is used
much. The COBOL runtime uses CHKPT for our checkpoint/restart functionality,
I think DFSORT does as well, and also Broadcom's Smart/RESTART facility.
There
Presumably a FICON wrap-around cable.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Dana Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 3:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: GRS setup for MONOPLEX to SYSPLEX
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:10:05 -0500,
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:10:05 -0500, Paul Gorlinsky
wrote:
>Thanks everyone ... I will try the Backplane method and post results
>
Sorry, what exactly do you mean by 'Backplane method'?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
There are a lot of documented restrictions with CHECKPOINT and NAME/TOKEN
services.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> On Jun 18, 2023, at 10:31 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>
> In years gone by, I had checkpoint/restart in COBOL programs using Tape, so
> that they could pick back up from the last checkpoint. Obviously a long
> running program since it was processing multiple tapes (reel to reel stuff).
>
> In
Sigh, yes this has been happing for quite a few years. I first noticed it in
2002.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, June 21st, 2023 at 11:01 AM, Farley, Peter
<031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Unfortunately, the
Unfortunately, the ignoring of low-end processor client needs is just a
reflection of the Armonk attitude and position that only high-margin business
is worth IBM's attention. No concern for growing smaller clients into larger
ones at all. I have never understood that attitude, as it seems to
Thanks everyone ... I will try the Backplane method and post results
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Hi Peter,
This works:
STR14,0(,R13)
JAS R14,*+4+8
DCC'$SL$',Y(x,y)
L R14,0(,R13)
and I can do DA=(14R?,EQ,5BE2D35B)
Where x is a module's identification number and y is the nth macro
expansion for my SLIP trigger macro.
What I wanted to
Note on GBP duplexing: Not duplexing, to my understanding, would force a DB2
group restart after a CF failure.
On the other hand, duplexing GBP's can be expensive. Fortunately, IBM
introduced asynchronous duplexing which saves quite a bit of CPU. You just
have to make sure your z/OS, CF
As you have observed, there is no support for "PSW".
I'm curious what SLIP trap you're setting that would let you even know to look
at "+4". You'd have to know that the instruction itself was a branch and that
it was one of "your" branches. If you really could tell that it was one of your
Classification: Confidential
I would tak a couple of FICON cables and string them between ports. Not sure
about the z/14 hardware design.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gorlinsky
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 8:32 AM
To:
I presented – briefly – on this yesterday at the Munich Resilience/Resiliency
conference.
Yes, SMF 74-4 tells you what IS – and perhaps tells you stuff to make you
resize structures.
To the point, though: You need to think through the scenarios – both for memory
and CF CPU. For example, you
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 23:46:28 -0500, Brian Westerman
wrote:
>As you all know, the z/OSMF product is the ONLY way to install z/OS, (without
>using COS), and the product doesn't even run in a usable way on their
>smallest, (but still supported and sold) processors.
CBPDO still works for
18 matches
Mail list logo
