There is no automatic environment integration. There is an API that makes it
easy for the developer of an application to support Rexx scripts and there are
environments whose developers have exploited that API. ooRexx is not inferior
in that regard.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 07:17:35 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>I guess when the utility was developed JCL was way simpler and test cases
>were limited.
>
>After Gil raised the various gotchas, I wrote myself a PUTPDS program with
>a user defined delimiter. Eschewing 2 bytes means I can come up with
VSAM? No IMS / DB2 overhead.
Datacom? PS-FB.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:08 PM Pierre Fichaud wrote:
>
> I think in most cases, the database will be local.
>
> Assuming local, is access faster using DFSRRC00 or ODBA.
>
> If not local, what is faster?
>
> Thnx, Pierre
>
>
If they hadn't had glass platters I would have seriously considered it! I
didn't want to have the glass mess.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jousma, David
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 2:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re:
I think in most cases, the database will be local.
Assuming local, is access faster using DFSRRC00 or ODBA.
If not local, what is faster?
Thnx, Pierre
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
I guess when the utility was developed JCL was way simpler and test cases
were limited.
After Gil raised the various gotchas, I wrote myself a PUTPDS program with
a user defined delimiter. Eschewing 2 bytes means I can come up with a very
random string such as !@#$%^&* ADD NAME=MEMBER. Not
Would have been fun to line them up on a fence, and do some target practice!!!
Dave Jousma
Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Pommier, Rex
Date: Monday, April 15, 2024 at 2:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
If the database is local, ODBC will slow it down. DFSRRC00 is batch
oriented ( may run with TM/DBCTL as well).
The question you need to answer is where the database is.
ITschak
*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous
Nope, but I did take the now-holy disks back to work to show them the
destruction.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
rpinion865
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 1:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IBM key management products
If the database is local, ODBC will slow it down. DFSRRC00 is batch
oriented ( may run with TM/DBCTL as well).
The question you need to answer is where the database is.
ITschak
*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous
Did you have the auditors present so they could certify your actions :) ?
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Monday, April 15th, 2024 at 2:32 PM, Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Didn't phase the drill bit one bit (sorry for the bad pun). I just had to be
> careful not to punch a hole in the
Didn't phase the drill bit one bit (sorry for the bad pun). I just had to be
careful not to punch a hole in the bottom of the drives so as to not get glass
shards dropping on my (very messy) shop floor.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Brennan
Nice! That's the first I've heard of glass platters. Hope your drill
bit survived the trauma :)
On 4/15/2024 8:33 AM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
Hi Tom,
Regarding #2, at a former job I got to decommission an HDS box that was shared
between the mainframe and Unix boxes. Unencrypted disk in it.
>Java's not perfect, but it is powerful and it is pretty much universally
>available on z/OS.
People don't understand the ingenuity behind REXX and don't understand the real
problems it solves. From a language standpoint, REXX is just another language
but it's real strength is it's environment
To All,
My IMS is somewhat limited and my terminology may be incorrect.
Is there a performance difference between 1) executing DFSRRC00 and 2)
executing an assembler program that uses ODBA calls ?
1) An assembler routine and a PSB name would be provided to DFSRRC00.
I'm not
Hi Tom,
Regarding #2, at a former job I got to decommission an HDS box that was shared
between the mainframe and Unix boxes. Unencrypted disk in it. Mgmt wanted the
data destroyed so they asked me to take the individual drives home and drill
through each of them. That was when I found out
In a single word, yes.
And as has been stated, setting up "DLM=" requires, at times, a
scan of just the first several bytes of each logical record to
find what unique value(s) one can use.
Steve Thompson
On 4/15/2024 3:30 AM, wrote:
Just curious. Have anyone had problem with this
This survey is BS.
On the first page, it touts interoperability between 31-bit and 64-bit. This is
only a thing because of the ridiculous decision to use XPLINK linkage for
64-bit Cobol. The z/OS architects made that a non-issue with F4SA, F5SA, etc.
LE designers made some bad decisions when
If not correctly shown, the surve link is:
https://ibmxm.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_5zhKYEpP68L4Yjc
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
Take our quick survey on IBM Enterprise COBOL for z/OS (COBOL) 6 modernization
features: https://ibmxm.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_5zhKYEpP68L4Yjc! Share your
feedback on learning and using the latest advancements in COBOL 6. It only
takes 5 minutes to complete. Your insights will shape the
Just curious. Have anyone had problem with this delimiter problem in real life
with anything other than JCL in the inline input data?
(I mean the alternative of a separate file seems to be a better/normal
alternative unless the inline data is at the end of the member/ds.)
21 matches
Mail list logo
