I don't think they sold it to anyone, I believe it's just been rendered
obsolete. A lot of people who used it were using it for mostly the automation
capability part(s) so it conflicted with the "other" (much more expensive)
automation product they sell.
When they first announced it, we
The first link was working, but here’s an updated link:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/announcements/z-linuxone-2q-2024-statement-direction
This link to the FAQ document still seems to be working:
https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/Y6E9KLA8
—
Timothy Sipples
Senior Architect
Digital Assets,
Just a question?
Sent from my iPhone
No one said I could type with one thumb
> On Apr 24, 2024, at 17:51, Jousma, David
> <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Just wondering why it might matter?
>
> Dave Jousma
>
> Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering
Just wondering why it might matter?
Dave Jousma
Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering
Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI
49546
616.653.8429
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steve
Radoslaw. That is as good as answer as any
Sent from my iPhone
No one said I could type with one thumb
> On Apr 24, 2024, at 17:36, Radoslaw Skorupka
> <0471ebeac275-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> W dniu 24.04.2024 o 23:19, Steve Beaver pisze:
>> My understanding is that
W dniu 24.04.2024 o 23:19, Steve Beaver pisze:
My understanding is that IBM sold off Netview.
Who did they sell it to?
HCL?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
And - to follow-up one more time, the SIR documentation from the MVSSIGSETUP
service has this to say:
If the interrupt cannot be processed at this time, possibly due to general
register 13 not currently containing the address of a program stack, or the
last
service called on the
My understanding is that IBM sold off Netview.
Who did they sell it to?
Sent from my iPhone
No one said I could type with one thumb
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 06:02:30PM +, Jim Mulder wrote:
> From software point of view, the only difference between an operation
> exception for a 00xx or 00x or 00xx in the instruction
> stream vs an invalid opcode B2xx in the instruction stream
> would be the Instruction
So - of course - the Meta.ai was having some "hallucinations"...
Which brings me back to my original question - how can the SIR know that
COND_SETUP has been invoked and that a signaled should be "pushed back"?
- Thanks -
- Dave R. -
--
riv...@dignus.comWork: (919)
First link is dead, IMHO
It leads to some general information about pre-2020 Announcement Letters.
Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 24.04.2024 o 03:07, Timothy Sipples pisze:
I’d like to draw your attention to this new IBM Statement of Direction
regarding IBM Fibre Channel
Does it have to be defined?
What happens when you use it?
(Been many years since I used JES3)
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:45:19 -0400 IBM user wrote:
:>Hi group,
:>
:>I am new to JES3 systems and am told that to add a new SYSOUT class requires
a restart of JES3. Is that the case?
:>
:>The only
From software point of view, the only difference between an operation
exception for a 00xx or 00x or 00xx in the instruction stream
vs an invalid opcode B2xx in the instruction stream would be the
Instruction Length Code, and I don't think that would be an important
I didn't notice that reference to the B2Ex opcodes before. Bitsavers
https://bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/princOps/
has several old editions of the POO, wherein I see:
The -4 edition of the System/370 POO (1974) has the reference to the B2Ex
opcodes.
The -6 edition (1980) does not reference B2Ex,
Hi group,
I am new to JES3 systems and am told that to add a new SYSOUT class requires a
restart of JES3. Is that the case?
The only thing I can find about modifying the config the *MODIFY,CONFIG command
which can change these items.
SNA RJP
RJPWS - SNA RJP workstation characteristics
Well - on a whim - I put this question to Facebook's Meta.ai:
In z/OS - how does a "Signal Interface Routine" know that the
COND_SETUP service has been called, so it can "push back" a signal?
and it gave me this answer:
In z/OS, a Signal Interface Routine (SIR) can determine if the
Trying to work out a problem where a BPX_COND_WAIT is returning
with an EINVAL and the Jr-errno indicating JRNotSetup.
The basic flow-of-control is:
invoke COND_SETUP
invoke COND_WAIT
so - the only way I can get this EINVAL (which doesn't happen every time mind
you)
is if there is a
While there is automatic upper casing for TSO command and subcommand names,
there are still plenty of cases ;-) where case matters. Consider generating
SYSIN for an IBM service aid or utility. Or generating edit subcommands with
case-sensitive operands.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
De gustibus. To me the sparse form looks clearer.
Yes, if you refrain from assigning a value to delete then these are equivalent:
delete foo
'DELETE' foo
'DELETE 'foo
'DELETE ' || foo
Note that abuttal with separating blanks yields a single blank; if you want
multiple blanks
19 matches
Mail list logo
