TTIMER CANCEL
Joe
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 4:43 PM Tony Thigpen wrote:
> How do you cancel an outstanding STIMER?
>
> Tony Thigpen
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to
t; Dave Jousma
> Vice President | Director, Technology Engineering
>
>
>
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
> of Joe Monk <05971158733e-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
> Date: Thursday, March 28, 2024 at 8:56 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Have you tried MODE S (streaming) and TYPE E?
Joe
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 7:31 AM Jousma, David <
01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> All,
>
> Grasping at straws here, IBM support center is baffled too.
>
> To clone z/OS maintenance to various disconnected sysplex’s I do a
linux.mainframe.blog
Joe
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 2:46 PM Steve Thompson wrote:
> Any one know where IBM is hiding this now?
>
> I've been searching for this to find the latest copy, and I'm
> getting nowhere.
>
> I used to be able to put in IBM TECH LIBRARY and it would be in
> with the z/OS
Take a look at the CBT, file 846.
I believe the TRK0SAVE program takes the IPL records from a DASD and writes
them out to a dataset.
https://www.cbttape.org/ftp/cbt/CBT846.zip
Joe
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:20 PM Charles Mills wrote:
> I am interested in writing a program to read the IPL
What (if any) is the difference between the STSI instruction and the
SYSEVENT QVS service, other than maybe the C interface?
Thanks,
Joe
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
How would that be practical? How would you, for instance, do a batch update
to an encrypted dataset from a CICS vsam file?
Joe
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 2:42 PM Walt Farrell wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 16:15:38 +, Eric D Rossman
> wrote:
>
> >Answering a number of comments in order, in one
Second this. I have a DELL 42" monitor which I used with multiple computers.
Joe
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 12:26 PM Henri Kuiper
wrote:
> All I can say is, if you have multiple devices, go for a monitor that also
> acts as a KVM-switch... I've a DELL Dell C3422WE at "only" 34" but the
> ability
1.
Restrictions for encrypted data sets
-
System data sets (such as Catalogs, SMS control data sets, SHCDS, HSM
data sets) must not be encrypted, unless otherwise specified in
product documentation.
-
Data sets used during IPL must not be encrypted.
Page
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 16:28 Paul Gilmartin <
042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:18: 05 -0500, Charles Hardee wrote:
> >
> >Thanks in advance for anyone that can shed light on the subject.
> >
> >Is there a umechanism for setting a JCL type variable
"LexisNexis is over 200 years old..."
Bull. LexisNexis was started by a lawyer in 1956...
Joe
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 7:57 AM Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Shocking, LexisNexis is over 200 years old and is designed specifically
> for legal purposes.
It will abend for sure.
Joe
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 5:52 PM Bernd Oppolzer
wrote:
> It will not work, because almost every single instruction has an error
> or two.
> Every programmer with a little bit ASSMBLER experience can see this;
> this ChatGPT program has no grasp of instruction
It doesn't even establish addressability.
Joe
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 5:52 PM Bernd Oppolzer
wrote:
> It will not work, because almost every single instruction has an error
> or two.
> Every programmer with a little bit ASSMBLER experience can see this;
> this ChatGPT program has no grasp of
Assembler is only relevant to the Machine.
Joe
On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 12:23 AM Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Assembler is only relevant to the Runtime
>
> Matt Hogstrom
> PGP key 0F143BC1
>
> > On Sep 3, 2023, at 13:26, Paul Gilmartin <
> 042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> >
> >
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/inline-files/IBM%20Mainframe%20Life%20Cycle%20History%20V2.13%20-%20July%2011%202023.pdf
- slide 4
z13s is EOS on 12/31/2024.
Joe
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 1:58 PM Claude Richbourg <
claude.richbo...@myfloridacfo.com> wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> We
I think he was asking about the hosting company.
They will always have access via the HMC. In addition, since their network
will be used to access the OSA-ICC port, they will have access via that
method.
Joe
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:01 AM Tom Longfellow <
gt;
>
> - KB
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Wednesday, July 12th, 2023 at 9:17 AM, Laurence Chiu
> wrote:
>
>
> > Thanks. I thought as much as Googled for this but this link didn't pop
> up.
> > That is pretty conclusive.
> >
> > On W
Page 129
https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245444.pdf
Joe
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 5:12 PM Laurence Chiu wrote:
> We are having a LPAR being stood up on an outsourcing company's host. It
> will be for our use but they will manage it via the HMC's and possibly the
> OSA-ICC port.
You can always map the TCB and reference field TCBTTIME to get the
accumulated CPU time for the task - I think its offset 316 decimal.
Joe
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 4:22 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I just got this tossed at me by an application developer. Cobol 6.3. Is
> there some
Ok well you can also get it from the github link I shared with you
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 10:59 AM Dave Jones wrote:
> Thanks, Joe, but I don't have access to a z/OS system to perform those
> steps.
> Take care.
> DJ
>
> --
>
Dave,
Those are TSO TRANSMIT files. The hint is in the first record ... *\INMR01
There is a $INSTALL member that is in REXX. It will install all these
files...
Prompting will occur for hlq and optional volser.
and it will then issue the TSO RECEIVE command for the
the following
Also, https://github.com/PCRE2Project/pcre2
Joe
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 8:02 AM Dave Jones wrote:
> Hello, all.
> Is there any place where I could access and download the PCRE2 source code
> from the port by Ze'ev Atlas? That might be useful to folks that don't have
> easy access to a z/OS
CBTTAPE 939
Joe
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 8:02 AM Dave Jones wrote:
> Hello, all.
> Is there any place where I could access and download the PCRE2 source code
> from the port by Ze'ev Atlas? That might be useful to folks that don't have
> easy access to a z/OS image...
> Thanks.
> DJ
>
>
You use the LE service CEETBCK. This is the traceback utility and can be
used to walk the call chain backwards from Enteprise COBOL.
Joe
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 12:08 PM Schmitt, Michael
wrote:
> I wrote an assembler subprogram that gets the name of the caller of the
> caller, i.e. if A > B >
"If the operation is completed with condition code 0, the contents of
general register R1 are incremented by the contents of general register R1 +
1, and then the contents of general register R1 + 1 are set to zero. If the
operation is completed with condition code 1, the contents of general
A lot of times, U4038 is not enough region...
Joe
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 6:15 AM Cameron Conacher <
03cfc59146bb-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Good call
>
> I ALLOCATE once.
> And just before GOBACK, I issue the FREE. Just one time.
> I am thinking it might be related to
"I know more about banking than you know it alls."
You dont know what you dont know.
Joe
On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 9:16 PM Bill Johnson <
0047540adefe-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I know more about banking than you know it alls. Already proved Crayford
> wrong regarding the
"Too many languages lack ELSEIF and strong closure. Fie on
the danglig ELSE!"
Now you know why COBOL programmers always indented their code ... it helps
line up the IF...ELSE structure. That was of course before VS COBOL II
(Cobol '85).
Joe
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:01 AM Paul Gilmartin <
Or you just could do an STFLE and check the facility bits...
Joe
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 10:52 AM P H <
04843e86df79-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> This doc (url below) will give you a list of what is available/supported
> on different generations of the current System z. However
You can also use the STCKSYNC macro...
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=xct-stcksync-store-clock-synchronous-service
And you can get info from CLOCKXX in SYS1.PARMLIB.
Joe
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 4:08 AM Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD. <
supp...@dunnitsys.com> wrote:
> Big help! You
"The one rack z16 (aka Business Class) has not yet been announced,"
It already exists. See slide 91.
https://ibm-zcouncil.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/z16-Technical-Overview-50M-KennyStine.pdf
Joe
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 7:45 AM Mike Shorkend
wrote:
> The one rack z16 (aka Business
The TSO call parm string is 100 characters. Is that not enough?
Joe
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 7:01 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> While the TSO authorized service facility will certainly do the job, I
> suspect that eventually System Rexx will become mandatory, so you might
> want to get your feet
Page 4-82 of the PoOPS says:
"If CPU power-on reset establishes the configuration, then it sets the
architectural mode to one of the following:
-
The ESA/390 mode (when neither the ESA/390-compatibility-mode facility
nor the CZAM facility is installed)
-
The
Jake,
What application is this from?
Joe
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 3:24 AM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> Hello Joe
>
> Would you please point me to the manual where it explains?
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023, 1:20 PM Joe Monk wrote:
>
> > I thnk a VTAM cmd code of 23 is an appl
I thnk a VTAM cmd code of 23 is an application requested cancel.
Joe
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 10:46 PM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> Hello
>
> One of our application was reporting the below error. I was looking through
> the SNA and IP codes but not able to find or am ignorant about the below
> code
>
1. Right click on Table, select Data > Return all Rows..
2. Result will be displayed in 'SQL Results' view, in the Result1 tab
3. Right click on data (not column heading) any where and select Export >
All Results
4. Select the CSV file format in the wizard and then save the file
5. You will
ote that it took me years to realize this, and it was
> Joe Monk (who posts here) who told me the problem
> could be solved with DAT.
>
> BFN. Paul.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:55:41 -0600, Paul Edwards
> wrote:
>
> >Why is the first thing a concern?
> >
> >T
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=dfsms-zos-dfsmsrmm-reporting
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=generator-sample-report-definitions
Joe
On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 10:15 PM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> We use DFRMM. Is there any specific reporting batch that I can rely on ?
>
> On
I always find it fascinating when someone tries to explain to the IBM z/OS
designers how z/OS works...
Joe
On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 9:16 AM Michael Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 01:34:36PM +, Peter Relson wrote:
>
> > ASVTFRST is documented as "address of first available ASVT
"And
getting a caller to preserve their own registers instead of
trusting the called program is something under my control -
I don't need a z/OS change."
It doesnt work that way, because R14 will change between caller and called
program. R14 to the called program will not be the same as R14 just
I dont understand the premise here.
In AM64, LA loads 64 bits.
All of this talk of 32 bits seems to be nonsense. If the registers in
z/Arch are 64 bits, then your program is 64 bits... no? Every machine
instruction in AM64 is a 64 bit instruction... or am I missing something?
And the POPs for
BAKR (branch and stack) is an ESA/390 instruction.
Joe
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:00 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> > BAKR is not a S/370 instruction
>
> ?
>
> IBM Enterprise Systems Architecture/370 Principles of Operation,
> SA22-7200-0,
> <
>
"The SE code is running as a guest of the HMC. The two SE code instances
are clustered for high availability. One SE code runs the Primary SE the
other Alternative SE. These SEs perform data mirroring and their role can
be switched for maintenance purposes."
"Switching the Primary and Alternative
The online stuff says the tech specs are exactly the same as z/VSE 6.3,
because it is the same source code.
https://www.21stcenturysoftware.com/license-z-vse-code-from-ibm/
Joe
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 4:17 PM Radoslaw Skorupka <
0471ebeac275-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I'm
Word = 4 bytes
Doubleword = 8 bytes
Quadword = 16 bytes
Joe
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 9:07 AM Paul Gilmartin <
042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:03:24 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> >"The current PSW is replaced by a 16-byte PSW
> >formed from the
--Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Joe Monk
> Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2023 4:27 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Question and CZAM and IPL
>
> When a z/arch machine has CZAM installed, is it possible to use a short
> PSW to
When a z/arch machine has CZAM installed, is it possible to use a short PSW
to IPL. Or, does the short PSW always become a long PSW before IPL, so it
is better to use a long PSW to start with?
In POPs, it says on page 3-75:
"When the CZAM facility is installed, the IPL PSW has the short-PSW
https://community.broadcom.com/mainframesoftware/communities/all-discussions/viewthread?GroupId=2035=8eec743a-6017-4471-bbf9-d16d1caa9ca1=c66cac08-5724-4f3e-8734-56dffb11f900
Joe
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:32 PM Steve Beaver wrote:
> Does anyone know if Broadcom is staying with Chorus or move to
Not true.
The 3350 could run in 3330 compatibility mode and could be used with OS/360.
Joe
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 3:45 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Yes, but not OS/360.
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
> of David Spiegel
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/OS_VS2/Release_3.0_1975/
Joe
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 5:42 AM David Spiegel <
0468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Hi Leonard,
> You said: "... That computer center had MVS 3.0 running in the mid
> 1970s. ..."
> Is "MVS 3.0" a typo? (I do
i was just getting ready to say this same thing.
The 3390 reference shows that for a 3120 byte block, only 15 blocks fit on
a track, with a 16% space waste.
Your best bet is to use TRKCALC...
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=instructions-performing-track-calculations-trkcalc-macro
I know this is super old information ... but given the discussion so far,
it seems reasonable to at least apply the same concept ...
"The storage-protect unit has a 64 x 8 monolithic storage protection stack
that applies to main storage locations zero through 131,072 (in sequential
blocks of
Not sure that this is a winnable lawsuit though.
The architecture of a file (and the data therein) that is only needed to
run a product is not copyright protected. So copying the WSBIND
file doesnt necessarily amount to a copyright violation.
Joe
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 10:10 AM Bob T Roller <
"Storage keys are not part of addressable storage."
http://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/a227832d.pdf page 3-9
Joe
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 9:22 AM Ian Worthington <
047bb6801512-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Does anyone know where the storage protection keys are kept? It seems
Dont forget ZOC!
Joe
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 10:34 AM Sebastian Welton
wrote:
> >And now through consolidation, There's really only two TN3270 vendors
> left: Micro Focus and IBM!
> >
>
> I think people have mentioned that there are quite a few TN3270 clients
> still out there, on my (Windows)
http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/OS_VS2/Release_3.7_1977/GC28-0681-2_OSVS2_SPL_Initialization_and_Tuning_Guide_VS2_Release_3.7_3rd_ed_197601.pdf
Joe
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 6:30 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Does anybody have a link for a scanned copy of System Initialization
> Library for
The mapping macro should be in SYS1.MACLIB.
Joe
On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 7:26 AM Willy Jensen
wrote:
> I'm ok wth the layout of the SMF record as such, what I am looking for is
> the layout of the field SMF61CRC.
>
> --
> For
SMF record layouts are in the MVS SMF manual ...
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=mvs-zos-system-management-facilities-smf
The record layout is here:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.5.0?topic=rm-headerself-defining-section-51
When SMF61TYP = "A", that is a non-vsam record. The DSN
Can you post a CEDF trace?
Joe
On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 2:19 PM Crusty Old Guy
wrote:
> I have further information from the programmers.
>
> These are CICS programs. The programs do not initialize their working
> storage. I'm told everything is fine under z/OS 2.1.
>
> Under z/OS 2.4, they are
I would imagine so.
Just use BPXBATCH and supply the https commands.
Joe
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 10:53 AM Billy Ashton wrote:
> Hi everyone! You have been so helpful in the past to help me with
> getting my file transfers working with sftp, and now, we have a manager
> who wants to explore
According to the z/os unix system services command guide:
"An executable file copied from the file system into an MVS data set is not
executable under MVS. Some required directory information is lost during
the copy. See z/OS UNIX System Services User's Guide
"The SYS1.PARMLIB data set itself can be blocked and can have multiple
extents, but it must reside on a single volume. The parmlib concatenation
used at IPL must be a PDS. However, after IPL you may issue a SETLOAD
command to switch to a different parmlib concatenation which contains
PDSEs."
>From Marna Walle, back on July 20, 2022:
"As for the sizes, for z/OSMF ServerPac we have increased the shipped free
space to 40% per data set, and with linklst data sets have zero secondary.
This is an increase over the prior free space size we used to provide, in
hopes that will help for the
My GE 1101 (1st level Gen Engineering) class was PASCAL programming on a
DecSystem running TOPS20.
Never used it again.
Joe
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 3:55 PM Brian Westerman <
brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com> wrote:
> ME Too!! I can't remember ever using my Fortran after the class was
> over.
I would suggest you start by writing subroutines that can be called by a
COBOL program. This is how I learned.
Take a COBOL driver program, and instead of writing paragraphs to do the
functions, call an assembler routine. This will help you to learn linkage.
Learn to process passed variables,
Since $ is a valid character in a SYSNAME, I dont think you want to make
that change.
Joe
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022 at 11:44 PM Lizette Koehler
wrote:
> I have a coworker saying we should change our //etc/.. To
> /$SYSNAME/etc/.
>
>
>
> I am not familiar with coding this way
>
>
>
> Could someone
"After powering on the enclosure, the information indicator flashes to
indicate that the system is initializing and is not yet ready to be
accessed by either the management console or host systems. Once the
flashing amber light turns off, initialization is complete and the system
is ready for I/O.
Isnt ELAX IBM rational products?
Joe
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 9:04 AM Steve Thompson wrote:
> Any one heard of this or what it is?
>
> I got asked about it and I've never heard of it, and it is
> supposedly an IBM product and I can't find doc on it in an IBM site.
>
> Regards,
> Steve Thompson
Gilmartin <
042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:35:55 -0500, Joe Monk wrote:
>
> >Might be this: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57619
> >
> >Users of CSI and LISTCAT Level may receive inconsistent errors
> >on en
Might be this: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/OA57619
Users of CSI and LISTCAT Level may receive inconsistent errors
on entries that have no problem otherwise due to uninitialized
workarea data.
Joe
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 9:04 AM Jack Zukt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Another situation that
Reason code 00 is a storage key mismatch.
Joe
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:19 PM Brian Westerman <
brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com> wrote:
> The "normal" reason this happens (at least to me) is because the task
> isn't authorized to issue the detach. It has nothing to do with whether or
> not the
https://knowledge.broadcom.com/external/article/51114/isf024i-user-acidname-not-authorized-to.html
Joe
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 8:57 AM James, Joseph L. (CTR) <
04326c675d2d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> What is missing here? Ran SDSF in 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 with full SAF
>
Step 4.10.1.1
Starting with z/OS V2R5, JES2 no longer supports the z11 level for
checkpoint data sets. z22 mode was introduced in z/OS V2R2.
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4.e0zm100/Export_zOS_V2R4_to_V2R5_Upgrade_Workflow.html#mark147
Joe
On Thu, Aug
See here: https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/6NW3RPQV
* If ordering a zIIP, one or more general purpose processor (CP) per the
specialty engine is required. IBM has modified the ratio of zIIP to CPs to
be 2:1. Up to two zIIP processors may be purchased for every general
purpose processor purchased
you cant do it that way.
lsearch prepends to the include...
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=options-lsearch-nolsearch
Joe
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 4:49 PM Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
> I am trying to tell the C compiler to use MACRO file types for #include.
>
> The doc states:
>
>
___
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf
> of Joe Monk [joemon...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 11:14 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Blank page print after upgrade Zos2.5
>
> The JES2 guide says that
The JES2 guide says that JES2 calls IEFSD095 to build the separator pages...
"For printer-destined output, the separator routine can use an IBM-supplied
routine to construct separation records in a block character format. This
routine is a reentrant module named IEFSD095 that resides in the
The Extend VTOC is nice, but has one problem ... you could end up with your
VTOC in multiple extents.
I would back it up, empty the volume, and reinit.
Joe
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:01 AM Jack Zukt wrote:
> Thank you all for your input.
> I am going to try it like that
> Regards,
> Jack
>
>
I dont even understand what the problem is.
AWS is simply a disk format for a sequential file of tape blocks. What is
inside those blocks are for the program that reads/writes them to decide...
AWS does not decide that. You can easily compress, slice into blocks, and
write to AWS.
Sam Golobs
Moreover, a CICS macro would start with DFH... it wouldnt be called
IDENTIFY.
Joe
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 8:41 AM Ward Able, Grant wrote:
> As stated by IBM Hursley (John Tilling) on the CICS-List, CICS does not
> ship an IDENTIFY macro!
>
> Regards - Grant.
> Telephone Internal: 201496
FTP a job to jes2?
Joe
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 11:01 AM rpinion865 <
042a019916dd-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I'm working on an old z/OS 1.4 system. We need the ability to submit a
> batch job from within OMVS. But, the submit command isn't there. Is there
> any other way to
>From 1995...
https://books.google.com/books?id=L_AXQqZphvYC=PP93=PP93=fedex+cannot+get+off+the+mainframe=bl=RJK8q0mlHc=ACfU3U1Go2Rt2LmKmmx6rjISivUeRxhZpg=en=X=2ahUKEwi-ko6oser4AhX9KkQIHVutDp8Q6AF6BAgsEAM#v=onepage=fedex%20cannot%20get%20off%20the%20mainframe=false
Joe
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at
Why in the heck would you want to do that?
Joe
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 5:32 PM Tom Ross wrote:
> Greetings mainframers!
>
> This has porobbaly been asked and answered, but are there tools or
> companies
> that can convert or help to rewrite assembler applications or just programs
> into COBOL?
001664d8ede6c-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> you should have a look at LE 31/64 bit interoperability:
>
> https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=interoperability-introduction-amode-31-amode-64-programs
> Denis.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From:
If youre using LE, you can't mix 31 and 64 bit, because 64-bit C using LE
uses a 64-bit XPLINK which passes parameters from the stack above the bar.
I think you will have to write a glue assembler module to receive control
in AMODE 64 then SAM31 CALL SAM64 and back.
Joe
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022
aka Marketechture.
Joe
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 8:45 AM David Crayford wrote:
> Isn’t buzzword a buzzword? There’s some irony there.
>
> > On 20 Jun 2022, at 9:38 pm, Gerhard Adam wrote:
> >
> > discussed as to be non-existent. This sounds like more marketing hype
> perpetrated
>
>
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/1969381
Joe
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 7:00 AM David Crayford wrote:
> And yet still nobody seems to have grokked the fundamental differences
> between online systems and event-driven architectures. This is obviously
> not the forum for discussions on
CVS is 24/7 some pharmacies. Especially here in Texas.
https://www.cvs.com/store-locator/cvs-pharmacy-locations/24-hour-pharmacies/Texas/Houston
Joe
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 5:52 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Perhaps some are: CVS isn't.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>
On 20/06/2022 5:27 am, Joe Monk wrote:
> > "What have transactional systems like CICS or IMS got to do with
> > real-time, straight-through processing? Most mainframe transactions
> > store data that is later processed by batch, typically overnight."
> >
> > If
"What have transactional systems like CICS or IMS got to do with
real-time, straight-through processing? Most mainframe transactions
store data that is later processed by batch, typically overnight."
If you think CICS and IMS are transactional only, youre stuck in the '80s.
As an example, ICCF on
Radoslaw,
It's not good to argue with the guy who writes z/OS for ibm how it works.
Joe
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022, 06:50 Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 May 2022 13:00:58 +, Peter Relson
> wrote:
> >
> >> As far as I know, XCFAS would not allocate any data set other than what
> XCF
Itschak,
Looks like you want _BPX_SHAREAS=YES.
But note:
"If the extended attribute for the shared address space is not set, the
program will not run in a shared address space, regardless of the setting
of _BPX_SHAREAS. The attribute is set by extattr +s and reset by extattr -s.
If the
"In the accounting machine, what did the actual addition and printing
operations?"
The 6400 took up 90 sq ft. Yes, it was really 10 feet by 9 feet.
The electronics to do arithmetic, etc were all on what IBM called SMS
cards. Basically, discrete electronics, pre-integrated circuit/SLT.
The
"I've never seen a picture of one of
those wire boards being worked on and always assumed you did the work
while it was in the machine. "
Ummm ... not possible. To reprogram a board, you had to take a special IBM
tool and push the wire up thru the bottom of the board! Kinda hard to do
when the
Looks like maybe he wants _BPX_SHAREAS=REUSE
Joe
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 11:24 AM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2022 14:50:50 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> >_ç there are some restrictions.
> >
> Many. I believe BPXBATCH
Seymour,
Just like all z boxes these days, the z114 only runs in LPAR mode. There is
no way to defin\e an LPAR on a z114 for any machine type earlier than
ESA/390. Remember, z114 is a post z10 box.
Plus, SIO and its brethren do not exist in z/Arch. :) They were eliminated
from the instruction
Enzo,
Your problem may be that IBM no longer has the tools to generate Licensing
for this machine.
Joe
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 8:03 AM Enzo D'Amato
wrote:
> Thanks for the website information, this was a fascinating read. Either
> way, I am going to see what I can do about getting the
The lowest level LPAR supported on z114 is ESA/390.
https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247954.pdf
Joe
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 4:10 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Does the Z114 support an S/370 LPAR, or does he need to deal with S/370-XA
> or ESA? There is a significant jump in
BTW, there is a cable on ebay...
https://www.ebay.com/itm/125016972933?hash=item1d1b979e85:g:HM0AAOSwZSpdS7OC
Joe
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 1:36 PM Joe Monk wrote:
> The IBM part # is 41U0111 for a single phase 240VAC cable for the z114.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sa
The IBM part # is 41U0111 for a single phase 240VAC cable for the z114.
Joe
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 11:50 AM Harry Wahl wrote:
> Enzo,
>
> You may want to see if you can get a FlexCub which, with its PC Escon
> card, will connect your z114 to a PC based platform and emulate every type
> of
1 - 100 of 510 matches
Mail list logo
