Re: Commands via Rexx (Re: REXX vs other languages WAS: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-04-23 Thread Jeremy Nicoll
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024, at 11:25, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > The nice thing is that Rexx allows different variants of string > concatenations and one is free to use what seems to be the > "easiest", the "safest". Personally I use blank concatenations > by default and abuttal or || only if there

Commands via Rexx (Re: REXX vs other languages WAS: Rexx numeric digits and scientific notation question

2024-04-23 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
On 23.04.2024 05:03, Andrew Rowley wrote: On 23/04/2024 11:55 am, Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:59:47 +1000, Andrew Rowley  wrote:     ... To me, it is much clearer to be explicit, including the concatenation, e.g. "DELETE " || foo That overkill is apt to confuse a POSIX shell