Sysevent REQLPDAT is z/OS only.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Sysevent REQLPDAT offers quite a bit more information than Sysevent QVS
(https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.iead200/iead200821.htm)
and could also be called unauthorized when that matters.
Horst Sinram - STSM, z/OS Workload and Capacity Management
You might want to look at my SHARE presentation
http://share.confex.com/data/handout/share/126/Session_18592_handout_9070_0.pdf
I describe how BCPii is used to automate a daily DR test.
The lack of support for zVM is indeed annoying. I spoke to Steve
Warren(responsible for BCPII development at
That explains "A158" and "3090" (and "C580") :-) True dat. :-)
In my new "How To Be A Better Performance Specialist (Than Martin Packer)"
:-) presentation I reinforce the importance of having a view of an
installation's history.
I was talking last week to a customer's "NextGen z" people with
I've known shops that let serial or model number creep into naming conventions.
Like Mark, we control names across upgrades. Back in the Stone Age, IBM used to
recommend embedding model number in SMF and JES names. And that required a cold
start to change! Sort of nuts it seems to me.
.
.
.
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:25:45 -0700, Ed Jaffe
wrote:
>On 4/26/2016 1:13 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
>> When my client replaces their CPCs the name is kept the same. For example
>> CPCA, CPCB, CPCC, ... etc. The RACF profile is based on that name so
>> nothing needs to
On 4/26/2016 1:13 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
When my client replaces their CPCs the name is kept the same. For example
CPCA, CPCB, CPCC, ... etc. The RACF profile is based on that name so
nothing needs to be changed in RACF.
A RACF SEARCH command produces the following profiles beginning with
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 07:58:23 -0700, Ed Jaffe
wrote:
>Oh yeah, and I need to set up a
>slew of HWI security profiles in RACF with our new CPC serial number.
>Ugh. Another time...
>
When my client replaces their CPCs the name is kept the same. For example
CPCA,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 07:58:23 -0700, Ed Jaffe
wrote:
>On 4/25/2016 5:20 PM, Pinnacle wrote:
>> :-P BCPii is fairly prevalent these days.
>> It's enabled everywhere I've been.
>
>Now that we're talking about BCPii, despite it being a _totally,
>completely and
Yep. I can get there. Getting in and out of supervisor state is common
in my code.
Tony Thigpen
Greg Dyck wrote on 04/26/2016 01:13 PM:
Tony,
If you can get into supervisor state, use the STSI instruction.
Under z/OS the CSRSI service uses STSI to provide the data that it
returns to problem
Tony,
If you can get into supervisor state, use the STSI instruction.
Under z/OS the CSRSI service uses STSI to provide the data that it
returns to problem program state requestors. I don't know if VSE
provides any equivalent service.
Greg
On 4/25/2016 10:55 AM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
Is
On 4/26/2016 12:15 PM, Phil Smith III wrote:
Assuming what you want to know is MSU counts (not clear to me from the
discussion so far), here's a Rexx snippet to show you those for the CEC and
the LPAR:
/* REXX -- Looks at memory and displays MSU counts */
z =
Charles Mills wrote:
> VSE (as the OP wanted) or only z/OS?
Oops. I didn't notice that. Never mind.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
VSE (as the OP wanted) or only z/OS?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Phil Smith III
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 9:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: can a program determine the capacity setting
Assuming what you want to know is MSU counts (not clear to me from the
discussion so far), here's a Rexx snippet to show you those for the CEC and
the LPAR:
/* REXX -- Looks at memory and displays MSU counts */
z = c2d(storage(d2x(c2d(storage(d2x(c2d(storage(10,4))+604),4))+228),4))
say
Caveat: the daily digestion causes response delays... I'm sure someone's
already suggested this very same...
Tony: I feel QVS is your route (if available on VSE) and matches, almost
exactly, what you need. Even tho' it's listed in Auth'd Services, it has an
un-auth'd access method.
I have to agree that BCPii is an inappropriate answer to OP's question. We had
to set it up years ago when we went to GDPS to manage our DR environment. We
soon expanded its role to include all LPARs (except z/VM) on all CECs. I highly
recommend BCPii , which is more powerful today than when we
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Ed Jaffe
wrote:
> On 4/25/2016 5:20 PM, Pinnacle wrote:
>
>> :-P BCPii is fairly prevalent these days. It's
>> enabled everywhere I've been.
>>
>
> Now that we're talking about BCPii, despite it being a _totally,
> completely and
On 4/25/2016 5:20 PM, Pinnacle wrote:
:-P BCPii is fairly prevalent these days.
It's enabled everywhere I've been.
Now that we're talking about BCPii, despite it being a _totally,
completely and thoroughly_ inappropriate solution to the OP's original
question, I gotta wonder how prevalent
We actually offer SCRT based pricing, but most of our older customers
are licensed for "up to xxx MIPs" or "up to XXX MSUs". (MIPs or MSUs are
based on total system size, not LPAR capping.)
We also use CPUIDs in our product key.
But, I recently had a customer greatly increase their MSUs by
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
> I license my VSE software to customers based on their cpu capacity. In the
> past, I have trusted my customers, but recently, I have had two customers
> give 'inaccurate' information. I want to add code to my product
On 4/25/2016 10:00 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
I license my VSE software to customers based on their cpu capacity. In
the past, I have trusted my customers, but recently, I have had two
customers give 'inaccurate' information. I want to add code to my
product software key to validate either the
I used the C interface, IWMQVS, to SYSEVENT QVS on VSE.
--
This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by Google Message Security
and the UNICOM Global security systems. This message is for the named
person's use only. If you receive this message in error, please delete it
and notify
Maybe Marna and I should record a podcast item on BCPii enablement and
what it buys you.
Trouble is I know LITTLE about it. :-)
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Cloud & Systems Performance, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter /
I saw a paper a couple of months ago (I can't find it right now). It
related the experience of an insurance company migrating to a z13.
The performance tables indicated it should handle the workload, but it
was pegged at 100% and not meeting goals. They upgraded a little bit,
and the relief from
I license my VSE software to customers based on their cpu capacity. In
the past, I have trusted my customers, but recently, I have had two
customers give 'inaccurate' information. I want to add code to my
product software key to validate either the capacity setting or max MSUs.
I asked for
I thought there was a Rexx exec on Eric Loriaux's home page, but has gone
AWOL. Maybe PLANET MVS, but it's expired. Not a fun adventure. Thought for
sure we'd hashed this out before.
In a message dated 4/25/2016 7:02:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
walt.farr...@gmail.com writes:
I think
On 4/25/2016 3:37 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:19:10 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
On 4/25/2016 2:13 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:09:10 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Tony
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:28:28 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>I want to know if the box is an A01, M04, etc.
I think that others are hinting that may not be a meaningful question. Why do
you want to know, and what use do you plan to make of the information?
--
Walt
What is your programming environment? In what language are you querying?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 4:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: can a
I want to know if the box is an A01, M04, etc.
Tony Thigpen
Nims,Alva John (Al) wrote on 04/25/2016 07:20 PM:
Sorry, but I thought that Tony was asking what the processor was configured as.
For example our z114 is a S02 model, but configured down to a Q02. I guess
the question is a little
Sorry, but I thought that Tony was asking what the processor was configured as.
For example our z114 is a S02 model, but configured down to a Q02. I guess
the question is a little ambiguous, I read it as, how is the hardware
configured, regardless to any WLM settings.
Al Nims
Systems
The command you are suggesting does NOT tell you the MIPS only the MODEL and it
does not
Tell you if the LPAR has been soft or hard capped
Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Nims,Alva John (Al)
Sent: Monday,
#1. MVS Command; D m=CPU
CPC ND = 002818.M05.IBM.02.000CFD96
CPC SI = 2818.Q02.IBM.02.000CFD96
Model: M05
#2. Mark's MVS Utilities, IPLINFO program: http://mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
Which can also be used as a function call in REXX
x = IPLINFO(VAR,
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:19:10 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
>On 4/25/2016 2:13 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:09:10 -0500, John McKown
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
On 4/25/2016 2:13 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:09:10 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
Is there a way for a program to check the capacity setting for a
processor? For instance,
On 4/25/2016 11:09 AM, John McKown wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
Is there a way for a program to check the capacity setting for a
processor? For instance, are we running on a A01 or a w04, etc. processor?
--
Tony Thigpen
What OS? Hardware
CSRSI has this, right?
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieaa100/CSRSI_System_information_service.htm
(@Tony, great meeting you in person!)
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 13:09:10 -0500, John McKown
wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
>> Is there a way for a program to check the capacity setting for a
>> processor? For instance, are we running on a A01 or a w04, etc.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote:
> Is there a way for a program to check the capacity setting for a
> processor? For instance, are we running on a A01 or a w04, etc. processor?
> --
> Tony Thigpen
>
What OS? Hardware wise, there is STIDP. But it requires
Is there a way for a program to check the capacity setting for a
processor? For instance, are we running on a A01 or a w04, etc. processor?
--
Tony Thigpen
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
41 matches
Mail list logo