I agree that by the time you're talking to a DKIM (or any) filter, I expect
that this has been handled somehow. CRLF ends a line, anything before that
is part of the line, and WSP is just a space or a tab. Past that, garbage
in, garbage out.
Yup, which is why I'd prefer to take out the
On 2/2/2024 12:03 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 10:03 AM John Levine wrote:
It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 5:44 PM Steffen Nurpmeso
wrote:
>
>> But i cannot read this from RFC 6376.
>
On 2/1/2024 6:38 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Wed 31/Jan/2024 18:34:46 +0100 Hector Santos wrote:
If I add this feature to wcDKIM, it can be introduced as:
[X] Enable DKIM Replay Protection
That'd be deceptive, as DKIM replay in Dave's sense won't be
blocked, while there can be other