-1. The v= tag description is accurate.
There is no current DKIM design expectation for any other string value. The
current spec is `v=DKIM1`. Any software writing `v=DKIM1.0` is technically
“broken” and should not be encourage to exist or perpetuate.
IOW, software should not process the
Dne 13. 3. 2023 v 16:08 Murray S. Kucherawy napsal(a):
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:48 AM Jan Dušátko wrote:
I got recommendation to propose changes in that mailing group.
My work depend on appropriate protection of our brand, however this
tasks require also management of records required for
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:48 AM Jan Dušátko wrote:
> I got recommendation to propose changes in that mailing group.
> My work depend on appropriate protection of our brand, however this
> tasks require also management of records required for that protection.
> We have huge problem with
Dear,
I got recommendation to propose changes in that mailing group.
My work depend on appropriate protection of our brand, however this
tasks require also management of records required for that protection.
We have huge problem with identification of selector records required by
DKIM and also
