Ashik,
mail.netpiper.com resolves to 216.167.125.193 which works but it also
resolves to 216.167.60.4 which is listed in
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=216.167.60.4
So, I'm at a loss as to why there are two ip addresses assigned to
mail.netpiper.com. Looks like there is an actual
The IP 216.167.60.4 is the Primary IP of the server. Both points to the same
location. Can anyone tell me how I can get rid of this SPAM. I am facing
real problem due to this.
Regards
Ashik Hasim
- Original Message -
From: Rick Leske [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
The IP 216.167.60.4 is the Primary IP of the server. Both points to the same
location. Can anyone tell me how I can get rid of this SPAM. I am facing
real problem due to this.
Show us the log files. I'm now the third person to ask for 'em:
they're essential.
-Sandy
To Unsubscribe:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.netpiper.com ([216.167.60.4]) by fep19-app.kolumbus.fi
with ESMTP id
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 9
Oct 2002 01:27:48 +0300
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 01:56:50 +0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
For the SMTP, I have given the log option as LOG TO LOG SERVER. Can you tell
me where I can find this details? Today I will change to SYSMMDD.txt option
and will send yout he details. Thanks for your support. You know? There was
20,000 files in my SPOOL directory all the same SPAM messages!
I have deleted the account. But how many accounts do I delete? There are so
many addresses that are coming from this. When I delete the user creates
another account and sends again. What can I do? Please help me.
Ashik
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi all,
Is there a way to find out where sends a lot of realy great email to our
server, while the messages a still incoming?
The Q- and T-Files are locked from the OS, in the logfile are so much
data that's hard to find the appropriate line. I dont want to stop and
restart the SMTP-Service only
'No Mail Relay' No Mial Relay *NO MAIL RELAY*
block that 'users' ip address via the admin - access list.
use declude junkmail
~Rick
I have deleted the account. But how many accounts do I delete? There are
so
many addresses that are coming from this. When I delete the user creates
another
I did a 'dig lacofd.org mx' on the DNS server and at first it timed out.
dig eachserver and you will see that one is not responding. Now, if Imail
kept hitting on that one, that would explain why Imail was deciding no MX
records, so try the A record, but where did it get the A record from?
Is there a way to find out where sends a lot of realy great email to our
server, while the messages a still incoming?
in the log files, look for the SMTPD lines, and
09:30 02:39 SMTPD(D61A0146) [10.0.0.109] connect 64.83.222.35 port 41626
your ip
Hi all!
I have been approached with the following questions which I do not know
how to answer
Q1: A server with 2 NIC's, each NIC with an IP from 2 different ISP
(redundancy). NIC number 1 has a MX record with a lower values and NIC
number 2 has a higher value. In theory, if the internet
Q1: A server with 2 NIC's, each NIC with an IP from 2 different ISP
(redundancy). NIC number 1 has a MX record with a lower values and NIC
number 2 has a higher value. In theory, if the internet connection to
NIC 1 fails, email servers will use the MX record with the higher value.
However,
Len,
Thanks for you input, however, it is not the NIC I am concerned about it
is the ISP which are dropping like flies. I do not want my client to
wake up in the mornining cast of into never never land. He lives and
dies by email (and does not trust hosting).
~David
-Original
Thanks for you input, however, it is not the NIC I am concerned about it
then I'd alias multiple ip's on one NIC
is the ISP which are dropping like flies. I do not want my client to
wake up in the mornining cast of into never never land. He lives and
dies by email (and does not trust
Hey All,
I'm not sure if this is a problem with iMail or Windows, but I guess this is
a good place to ask :-)
About a week after our server reboots, it ceases to be able to send outgoing
mail. It looks like every outgoing connection to any IP on port 25 is
blocked (even to localhost 25).
Hello,
We have a small NT/2000 network (3 DCs and about 200 NT4 clients) and run
IMail 7.13 on an NT4 BDC using the NT user database. The NT4 BDC is a PIII
866 with 256MB RAM and RAID5. IMail is lightning fast on this machine. For
example, I can grab 1000 messages via IMAP in just about 10
I have deleted the account. But how many accounts do I delete? There are so
many addresses that are coming from this. When I delete the user creates
another account and sends again. What can I do? Please help me.
So does this mean that you offer free E-mail service?
That's a whole separate
took over full control over my DNS
yesterday morning, But everything worked great until I think it was about 5 -
6:00 pm last night, when it started not sending mail.
***Log Files for 10-09-02
20021009 091137
127.0.0.1 SMTP (403) Stack connect fail
"205.188.145.215&quo
Another possible answer - a simple router that can handle two WAN
connections for the upstream problem?
For my home office I'm going to have both an DSL connection and a Cable
connection. I'm getting a Nexland Pro800turbo, which load balances
across the two connections.
This is still theory,
Just out of the blue sometime in the late hours last night, My IMail
decided that it did not want to send mail anymore??? It receives, But
Yet, Cannot send out mail!.
Here is the last entries into my Log file for today.
stack connect fail is FAQ, list archives and kb and then check back
.
***Log Files for 10-09-02
20021009 091137 127.0.0.1 SMTP (403) Stack
connect fail 205.188.145.215
20021009 091137 127.0.0.1 SMTP (403)
requeuing E:\IMAIL\spool\q25d233e.smp R0 T2
20021009 091137 127.0.0.1 SMTP (403)
finished E:\IMAIL\spool\q25d233e.smp status=3
20021009 091217 127.0.0.1 SMTPD
All, does anyone currently use or know how to configure iMail to use Radius
Authentication? I have searched the KB and Internet to no avail. The
following IPSWITCH page eludes that it is possible to configure iMail to use
Radius.
http://www.ipswitch.com/Products/IMail_Server/odbc.html
At
I do give free email service. But I have removed mail relay and has set the
maximum recipient per message to 20. Still this happens!
Yes, that will happen. If you offer people free mail service, spammers
will gladly take advantage of it. Note that the Maximum recipients per
message setting
We are running Imail 6.06 and the newest version of Declude. I have several
companies including a few local Governments that use ETRN on our system and
they do not collect email on the weekends. I have my queue set to hold email
for 10 tries and 3000. After I installed declude I found that the
not sending mail.
***Log Files for 10-09-02
20021009 091137
127.0.0.1 SMTP (403) Stack connect fail
"205.188.145.215"20021009 091137
127.0.0.1 SMTP (403) requeuing
E:\IMAIL\spool\q25d233e.smp R0 T220021009 091137
127.0.0.1 SMTP (403) finished
E:\I
just took over full control over my DNS
yesterday morning, But everything worked great until I think it was about 5 -
6:00 pm last night, when it started not sending mail.
***Log Files for 10-09-02
****20021009 091137
127.0.0.1 SMTP (403) Stack connect fail
"
We are running Imail 6.06 and the newest version of Declude. I have several
companies including a few local Governments that use ETRN on our system and
they do not collect email on the weekends. I have my queue set to hold email
for 10 tries and 3000. After I installed declude I found that the
I do give free email service. But I have removed mail relay and has set the
maximum recipient per message to 20. Still this happens!
Regards
Ashik Hasim
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 4:15 PM
Subject:
Another possible answer - a simple router that can handle two WAN
connections for the upstream problem?
I agree that this should be handled by hardware before the servers,
either by BGB, special routers that do failover, or software like
RainConnect.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
I have not been so privileged to see the No Mail Relay option fail but
here is my two cents if your No Mai Relay option is being compromised.
Also keep in mind gentlemen that usernames and passwords are sent in
clear text to authenticate a mail client to the mail server. This means
that
Ok, that makes sence, Most of the GSE files are because the spam email
folder is continualy overflowing. Before installing Declude on last Friday
an average mailbox was reciveing 200+ spam messages a day! Hence th need for
Declude. I have a few problems at the moment, like Bellsouth.net emails
We have a small NT/2000 network (3 DCs and about 200 NT4 clients) and
run
IMail 7.13 on an NT4 BDC using the NT user database.
I am going to guess here is that you are trying to use the NT user
database in the Imail settings on the 2000 AD server. That will not
work. (I think.)
Active
--PEBKAC (Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair.)--
ROFLMAO! :)
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
Interesting. That is our next step instead of an internal I-Mail dbase.
Let me do some digging
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Koontz
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum]
orked great until I think it was
about 5 - 6:00 pm last night, when it started not sending mail.
***Log Files for 10-09-02
20021009 091137
127.0.0.1 SMTP (403) Stack connect fail
"205.188.145.215"20021009 091137
127.0.0.1 SMTP (403) requeui
John Tolmachoff wrote:
Another possible answer - a simple router that can handle two WAN
connections for the upstream problem?
I agree that this should be handled by hardware before the servers,
either by BGB, ...
Umm... I assume this is a typo and you meant BGP.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I will keep everyone posted. But as for the ndsreport site. when I
found out about the issue, It all looked to be in good working order.
Some [Yellow Warnings] and [ 1 red warning ] But not nothing that
indicated that the mail server was done. Except on time that I had
checked it,
Just remember, BGP is not a TRUE load balancing protocol... rather it is a
shared network connection protocol. BGP simply holds a table of network
routes and uses that table to send packets via the shortest node/hop count.
This often will over saturate one link while the other link gets minimal
Keith ---
Our server currently processes about 160,000 pieces of mail a day.
The .gse files were becoming a problem for us as there were about
100 being generated every three minutes or so with virtually all
being from spam sources with invalid addresses. This equates to
2,000 an hour, or 48,000
I know you guys are gonna say look at the archive on this and I have however, I can't
get a fix on this issue when I recieve an email with an excel document attached and
save to the desktop then open it I get an error unreconized format. The following
shows up after it opens
This happens even
Thanks for the quick reply...but we aren't using Active Directory...the
box is a stand-alone W2K server and we're using an IMail database
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:41 AM
I agree that this should be handled by hardware before the servers,
either by BGB, ...
Umm... I assume this is a typo and you meant BGP.
Yes. Darn keyboard virus.
:)
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
To
I would force the free users to grab a freeware SMTP tool and build
another hardened SMTP tool on another box. Some one is sniffing your
network or just being outright mischevious.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ashik Hasim
Sent:
Our server currently processes about 160,000 pieces of mail a day.
The .gse files were becoming a problem for us as there were about
100 being generated every three minutes or so with virtually all
being from spam sources with invalid addresses. This equates to
2,000 an hour, or 48,000 each day.
is greatly appreciated..
p.s.
I just took over full control over my DNS yesterday morning, But everything
worked great until I think it was about 5 - 6:00 pm last night, when it started not
sending mail.
***Log Files for 10-09-02
20021009 091137 127.0.0.1
Carrz KISS wrote:
...
Except on time that I had checked it, before uninstalling DNS.. Was
that is stated that I have not Reverse MX Record??? This confused
me, As I am not the most knowledgeable person in the world on DNS.
But I do know that you have to have an A Records set to mail' and
A customer of us brought a bouncing mail problem today while she was trying to send an
email to columbia.edu mail system.
She can not send any mail to any account in columbia.edu. Every mail is bouncing back.
However, I can send... I tried to send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] via my our
That would be great! We do see a huge amount of email come into our server
and the amount of Spam is staggering.
I would be very appreciative of your help.
Keith
- Original Message -
From: E Perrine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:10 AM
For a mail server with your level of traffic and abuse, you
really ought to
think about IMGate.
I got the same email from Len over two years ago. I waited almost one year
before following his advice. What a waste of a year. I would strongly
suggest that any high volume or spam attacked
Hello!! Weve
been experiencing a complete slowdown and delay of email with our IMail 7.12 server in the last few days. Processor speed is o.k., no new changes
have been applied to the box in the last couple of weeks except for the fact
that we entered specific relay addresses in IMail to
A customer of us brought a bouncing mail problem today while she was
trying to send an email to columbia.edu mail system.
Delivery failed 3 attempts: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
First, you should consider trying more than 3 times to send mail...
Have you checked the IMail SMTP log file to see what
Max,
I think you're confusing this with a different post. This one was about my
migration from NT to 2000.
--Todd.
- Original Message -
From: Max Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:27 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IMail SLOW after
Thank you Robert;
For the link http://www.DNSstuff.com .. I tested my DNS and it pained out
good for reverse.
BUT??? The only thing that has me a little worried..
Is at the bottom of the stats
Preparation:
The reverse DNS entry for an IP is found by reversing the IP, adding it to
Well it took me 8 months to convince the owners to fork out 500$ for
Declude, If I now go and ask for another machine to run bsd and IMGate they
will most likely freak out.
Besides Declude is doing a good job, its really Imail that needs to be
improved. If Imail dose such a poor job at handling
If you or anyone else can come up with anything, I would be eternally
grateful! g
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Douglas Mays
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Authentication via
Thanks Scott;
With going onto the DNSStuff site, and finding out that the
ns3.charter.com was down,
I called up Charter, and spoke with them about it, And someone there
screwed up and remove the Reverse Lookup on my IP Address.
They are fixing it now, and should have it up and running
Andrew P. Kaplan wrote:
Our server currently processes about 160,000 pieces of mail a day.
How do you read your log files, they must be over 50 megs.
Use a file viewer, not an editor.
I use V http://www.fileviewer.com/
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The avalanche has already started, it is too
I would add that on Cisco equipment CEF works wonders and will run with
BGP. BGP handles the available routes and CEF will balance the load.
_M
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dave Koontz
| Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:39
Mark -
This is currently happening to me as well. I have not been able to figure
out why.
I have to reboot my server about every 3 days to clear out the problem. I
have
opened many tickets with IPSWITCH, and followed all of their recomendations
but none of them have worked.
First I was told it
Thanks for the quick reply...but we aren't using Active Directory...the
box is a stand-alone W2K server and we're using an IMail database
Uh, who are you and what do you have to do with the original post by
Todd Ryan?
Todd posted he was loading Imail on a Windows 2000 DC.
This morning, I
* Cleaned up old spool files
* Added the system account to the drive where IMail is hosted on the
server in question
hmm, you're just getting warmed up:
* separate imail spool dir and mailboxes to dedicated partitions, and
better, dedicated disks with tons of free space for .
*
For email servers you will want to use Raid 0+1 rather than Raid5, and
you should proabably consider putting your spool directory on a separate
drive of it's own.
$0.02
_M
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith
| Sent: Wednesday,
Hi all.
I have a customer who is on a shared Imail server with ~1000 other customers.
Recently someone has been impersonating him and sending porno spam. It is not a
trivial impersonation - they are actually able to relay mail via his Imail server from
a computer somewhere in Macedonia. The
The problem is with the sender domain. They can apparantly resolve your
domain but not bizandus.com. Since I also can resolve it, it seems to
me that the problem is with the columbia.com mailserver.
Dan
Serhan Sevim wrote:
A customer of us brought a bouncing mail problem today while she
Carrz KISS wrote:
...
The reverse DNS entry for an IP is found by reversing the IP, adding it to
in-addr.arpa, and looking up the PTR record.
So, the reverse DNS entry for 66.191.47.3 is found by looking up the PTR
record for 3.47.191.66.in-addr.arpa.
...
Asking NS3.CHARTER.COM. for
can you have the customer change his password?
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002 10:55 AM, Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all.
I have a customer who is on a shared Imail server with ~1000
other customers.
Recently someone has been impersonating him and sending porno
spam. It is not a
Our server currently processes about 160,000 pieces of mail a day.
How do you read your log files, they must be over 50 megs.
Andrew P. Kaplan
The way of a canoe is the way of the wilderness and of a freedom almost
forgotten...When a man is part of his canoe, he is part of all that canoes
Thanks Rod;
I recon it depends on how many times that you refresh the page. I
refreshed it about 15-times, and it will get
Answer:
66.191.47.3 PTR record: san-66-191-47-3.nc.charter.com. [TTL = 4650 seconds]
And then it would not get it, and then after about 3 times it would get it
again???
For the link http://www.DNSstuff.com .. I tested my DNS and it pained out
good for reverse.
I'm not sure what you mean by pained out good for reverse (are you
writing in a foreign language and having it translated by a
computer?). I'm guessing you mean Not good for reverse:
Answer:
An
Yes, definitely...sorry, it's been a pretty bad day..thanks for the
update.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Todd Ryan
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail SLOW after moving to
Imail listens on all ip's. I haven't see this confirmed, but I
suspect that no matter what ip a msg arrives on, Imail will accept
it if it's for any of Imail's domains.
Confirmed.
Imail listens on all ip's and I think it listens on all ip's for any mail
addressed to any domain
Actually, it does seem to work with AD. It WILL authenticate all my
accounts, but the connections are very slow.
Ipswitch also says this works since 6.03:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19991214-DM03.htm
--Todd.
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Again my point stands, If Ipswitch sees that there is room for that much
improvement in the Imail product then why are they not gearing themselves to
that goal. Not to say they aren't but lets face it IMGate has been around
for some time. Until last December we were not seeing much Spam at all.
Just a little more information here...
When we were testing our migration on a testbed AD domain, I also dit the
IMail migration. I forgot I still had that IMail setup running. So I
thought I'd try that one and see how it did. It is a Dell Optiplex GX110
desktop PC with 256MB RAM. Here's the
| Well it took me 8 months to convince the owners to fork out
| 500$ for Declude, If I now go and ask for another machine to
| run bsd and IMGate they will most likely freak out.
H, you probably could find a unused box and I bet if you gave Len Conrad
$500 to setup IMGate it would blow
panned out good (misspelled. Easy to realize this. Means that it worked?
DNS Is doing reverse) Did not meant to confuse you, simple typo, Like
everyone else makes in here as well.
Spell check does not always catch typos that are spelled correctly :-)
Read it again, and you should catch
Here might be some help. If the GOOD customer always send's from the
same IP address, then use the logs and track the e-mail that is sent
from him, NOT at that IP address. Then track that IP back. If it is
one of your customers, then you will be able to match the IP with a
login time for a
Hi
All,
I have a
problem adding a link in the login.html to a customized page with asp extension.
when I click the link it reloads the login.html though the page name is written
in the browser address bar. Is it not possible to link to a new page made by
me.
Thanks in
advance
Waheed
The following IPSWITCH page eludes that it is possible to configure
iMail to use Radius.
It is possible if the RADIUS server uses an ODBC back end grin.
Seriously, that's what it means. If there's an ODBC-capable access to
the data, you can use it. I know there are some ISPs on the
All, does anyone currently use or know how to configure iMail to use
Radius Authentication?
If you use SQL for your database, Imail can access the SQL database
directly. As far as I know, Imail cannot use RADIUS authentication. but if
Imail would add that, it sure would make connection to a
As far as mail processes We are an environment that runs I-Mail 7.13
with AV added in.
We have two NICS in the server (W2K Pro SP3/ Dell Optiplex PIII@866 MHz
and an IDE based HDD, no RAID) one for POP3 traffic to work on and the
other that users send SMTP traffic on.
We have about 70
Cool. Thank You.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Keith
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Problem with spool not removeing GSE files
That would be great! We do see a huge amount
It is most likely not his password. Any of the users that belong to 1,000 customers on
this server could send be sending this mail or could be being exploited.
-Original Message-
From: Bob McGregor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:58 PM
To: [EMAIL
Yeah I found the corresponding entries in the logs.
It is not a standard spam impersonation technique.
The From address belongs to the customer, however it is not a user address. It is an
alias. So it does not have a password.
AND the headers of the SPAM message show that the message was
Reply to: Max Carter
Re: [IMail Forum] Slow Delivery of Mail.. on Wednesday 9:57:58 AM
Yes, be very careful that your rules do not have lots of BODY
filters. This can slow e-mail dramatically in Imail.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original
I am also getting this error. I have two 3com nics in the machine, run Declude virus
with F-Prot and the OS is NT4.0 SP6a.
Greg
-- Original Message --
From: Rick Leske [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:59:04 -0500
I have a problem adding a link in the login.html to a customized page
with asp extension. when I click the link it reloads the login.html
though the page name is written in the browser address bar. Is it not
possible to link to a new page made by me.
Do you mean Does IMail's
Scott, all I can say is: WORD.
Okay, I can say something else.
Note that the Maximum recipients per message setting of 20 doesn't
mean that they can only send 20 E-mails per day. It just means that
they can only send to 20 recipients at one time.
Not even true for webmail, because it
I have a customer who is on a shared Imail server with ~1000 other customers.
Recently someone has been impersonating him and sending porno spam. It is
not a trivial impersonation - they are actually able to relay mail via his
Imail server from a computer somewhere in Macedonia. The Imail
LOGS?
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
Sounds good. Already blocked that Macedonian IP address.
-Original Message-
From: Mark [Support] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Andrey Fyodorov
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Need HELP with rules
Here might be some help. If the GOOD customer
Despite all of these steps we re still seeing mail delays of 6 24 hours
with IMail.
That is a huge delay, and would indicate that there are huge numbers of
E-mails in the \IMail\spool directory. Have you checked to see how many
E-mails are in there, waiting to go out? Have you checked to
You could go one step further and block them up at the router or
firewall level instead of adding more overhead to the I-Mail server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark [Support]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Andrey
I figured out how they were able to authenticate. But I still don't know who they are.
Somehow they must have picked the password for one of the users on the physical host
(i.e. our administrators)
This is because the message headers show the physical host name:
Received: from 66.46.145.35
and an IDE based HDD, no RAID)
Yikes for less than $300 (card and drive) you could setup mirroring with a
Promise controller card
Andrew P. Kaplan
The way of a canoe is the way of the wilderness and of a freedom almost
forgotten...When a man is part of his canoe, he is part of all that
Good idea, I'll turn off my batch tonight and see what I get for the next
couple days.
-Original Message-
From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 7:43 PM
To: Dustin Freeman
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] incomplete log files
Has any one seen
Actually, it does seem to work with AD. It WILL authenticate all my
accounts, but the connections are very slow.
Ipswitch also says this works since 6.03:
My bad. It does work. I was thinking of this where someone was trying to
use LDAP:
E-Mail seems to rock since we have implemented I-Mail here, we never
used anything less than v7.05 so I cannot give a very fair comparison
but I hope that the stats I provided will give you an idea of traffic
hitting the box.
it's easy to measure:
find /c ldeliver
[Please keep on-topic messages on-list.]
What I need is to achieve all the process automatically online
without any interference from me. I need you to explain more for me
please.
Logging in as Host Admin is something your customer will do without
you, but you need to set
Did you apply the HTML patch that came out from Microsoft last week?
Some one else posted it caused problems but I have seen no follow-up.
BTW, it seems the SP3 helped Imail.
10:24 PDT 10/09/02
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
