I'll bet there will be a change in the 1 or 2 versions of the Official
Webster's Dictionary to the English language in the definition of the word
Opt.Instead of meaning To choose something, it has come to mean To be
conscripted.
Any incoming delivery problem from domains with the word
OK, I've read all the posts related to this problems and have come to the
conclusion that Imail simply is not compatible with WIN2K.
I migrated from a single NT4 with a P3 and an Intel Pro 100 (which was
extremely fast and reliable for all my clients)
to an Intel server with dual Xeons and dual
OK, I've read all the posts related to this problems and have
come to the
conclusion that Imail simply is not compatible with WIN2K.
Not true. I'd bet the majority of IMail installations done these days are
on Win2K. This one is: http://killerwebmail.com, and its performance is
stellar.
::
OK, I've read all the posts related to this problems and have
come to the
conclusion that Imail simply is not compatible with WIN2K.
Not true. I'd bet the majority of IMail installations done these days are
on Win2K. This one is: http://killerwebmail.com, and its performance is
stellar.
::
Ron,
that's what I thought I double checked my virus scanner and all imail
dirs where excluded, I added the temp and winnt dirs to the exlcude and
found a major performance increase!!!
I am now determining which file(s) in particular are the ones that imail is
opening and closing
fyi... what led me to suspect this was something I noticed in the imail
administrator. Withthe AV running, even though the imail dir structure
was
excluded, the listing of domains would appear one at a time, painting down
the screen step by step. I shut off the scanner and the same list of
David Gregg wrote:
that's what I thought I double checked my virus scanner and all imail
dirs where excluded, I added the temp and winnt dirs to the exlcude and
found a major performance increase!!!
I'm glad to hear that your performance increased after excluding the WINNT
folder from
R. Scott Perry wrote:
I personally feel that the NIC drivers should just work, and that there
shouldn't be any problems with any NIC (whether due to an issue with the
driver or with IMail).
So do I, but many members have reported that the more powerful a NIC is,
the likelier that problems may
Scanning only on writes - not reads, on all folders except imail (no
scanning at all) seemed to fix my problems so far...
- Original Message -
From: Guy Isabel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: RETRACTION: Re: [IMail Forum]
Aaahhh, and the monk was enlightened.
Thanks, David
Guy
- Original Message -
From: David Gregg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 20:48
Subject: Re: RETRACTION: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail does not work with win2k
Scanning only on writes - not
Hello,
We have a department that is wanting to use Outlook calendar sharing
such as what Exchange offers. I knew eventually this would come up, and
I am sure that other departments will want it eventually. I am
wondering what other people do about this, we do not want to go to
Exchange because
Hello,
We are using Bynari for our Calendar sharing via Outlook with Imail server.
www.bynari.net
Be advised once some has access to a shared calendar they have full control
to the calendar. If you don't have users who play well together it could be
a headache waiting to happen.
Paul
Wow, I checked the pricing on that and it seems pretty steep. I just
did a quick search on Google and found this link:
http://www.workgroupfolders.com/
For the limited amount of users I'd have using this feature, something
like this might be better.
Too bad IMAIL doesn't work on a way to sync
http://www.outlook4team.com/
I also found this...
Seems interesting...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Paquette
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 11:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Exchange Emulation
Hello,
14 matches
Mail list logo
