Vince,
Your SMTP host seems blacklisted by AOL. As far as I know, AOL has it's own
spam blacklist database.
You can check if your SMTP server is listed by other common spam databases
by using spam database lookup on the page: http://www.dnsstuff.com.
Regards and good luck with getting off the
Hi all,
Anybody got a link to a good reliable disk benchmark program. I'm currently
trying to find out why it takes three times the time to zip logfiles on our
Imail server than on a webserver with the same cpu/mem. The only real
difference between the two machines is that the mailserver discs is
Anybody got a link to a good reliable disk benchmark program. I'm currently
trying to find out why it takes three times the time to zip logfiles on our
Imail server than on a webserver with the same cpu/mem. The only real
difference between the two machines is that the mailserver discs is
We bought in mid 1999 and it was somewhere around $1500
David
-
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:08 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: old pricing
Reply off list only!
Does anyone know about what the
I think I might have the answer... Your web server's file system is not
likely to be fragmented while your mail server's file system is.
Specifically, your mail server is constantly creating and destroying files
in the spool directory and as a result can become wildly fragmented. This
can result
Have you tried IOMeter? It was originally designed by Intel, and now is open
source...it can be found here:
http://sfads.osdn.com/2.html?topic=iometer,138,146,150
Shawn Faulkingham MCSE, CCNA, MCDBA
Senior Network Engineer
Indoff Incorporated
314.997.1122
-Original Message-
From: Rasmus
Adaptec 2100S raid controller.
/Rasmus
-Original Message-
From: Len Conrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17. marts 2003 14:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Disk performance measurement
Anybody got a link to a good reliable disk benchmark
program.
Adaptec 2100S raid controller.
that's not why I asked but I assume RAID is done by the SCSI controller,
not the OS.
have you tried using taskmgr to see what task is consuming cpu?
Len
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
: 'test', Server:
'mail.viosys.com', Protokoll: SMTP, Serverantwort: '550 unknown user
[EMAIL PROTECTED]', Port: 25, Secure (SSL): Nein, Serverfehler:
550, Fehlernummer: 0x800CCC79
In the Log from the Imail Server was the following entry.
20030317 155509 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (02C701E8) [212.78.101.188
I am seeing the lines below in our log files, they
have only started to appear over the last 3 weeks. Prior to this our log
files were much smaller due to the absence of these lines. (192.168.0.2 being
the IP address of our server behind a Firewall).
20030317 161127 127.0.0.1 SMTPD
Len,
Please bear with me, too many migraine meds on Sunday. I realized that I
shouldn't mix the valium with the codeine I'm on half dose today so maybe I
can get this right.
I was REPLYING to his damn message from the spam account... I didn't
enable SMTP AUTH on that account on my laptop,
I am seeing the lines below in our log files, they have only started to
appear over the last 3 weeks. Prior to this our log files were much
smaller due to the absence of these lines. (192.168.0.2 being the IP
address of our server behind a Firewall).
20030317 161127 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (00420290
to this our log files were much smaller due to the
absence of these lines.
MR (192.168.0.2 being the IP address of our server behind a Firewall).
MR 20030317 161127 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (00420290) [192.168.0.2] connect 192.168.0.2 port
3740
MR 20030317 161229 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (00430290) [192.168.0.2
entry.
20030317 155509 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (02C701E8) [212.78.101.188] MAIL
FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20030317 155509 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (02C701E8) [212.78.101.188] RCPT
TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20030317 155509 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (02C701E8) [212.78.101.188] ERR
eispost14.serverdienst.de invalid
in our log files, they have only started to
appear over the last 3 weeks. Prior to this our log files were much
smaller due to the absence of these lines. (192.168.0.2 being the IP
address of our server behind a Firewall).
20030317 161127 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (00420290) [192.168.0.2] connect
I've heard a lot of good things about Declude Junkmail on this list. Are
most of you Declude users also subscribed to RBL and OSRSS lists?
What I want to determine is whether Declude Junkmail is worth using without
the mail-abuse.org subscriptions, or whether those subscriptions provide the
I guess this got lost in the shuffle, but does anyone have a solution for
this?
We have iMail 7.13 and it will not set Cookies for automatic login. If I
check the box to save login info, it has absolutely no affect. Is there a
setting I'm missing?
Second, is there a way to keep attached
the last 3 weeks. Prior to this our log files were much
smaller due to the absence of these lines.
MR (192.168.0.2 being the IP address of our server behind a Firewall).
MR 20030317 161127 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (00420290) [192.168.0.2] connect
192.168.0.2 port 3740
MR 20030317 162859 127.0.0.1 SMTPD
. (192.168.0.2 being the IP
address of our server behind a Firewall).
20030317 161127 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (00420290) [192.168.0.2] connect
192.168.0.2 port 3740
This shows that your mailserver is connecting to itself, every 2
minutes,
but not actually sending any E-mail.
This is almost
Keith,
Monday, March 17, 2003 you wrote:
KWS What I want to determine is whether Declude Junkmail is worth
KWS using without the mail-abuse.org subscriptions, or whether those
KWS subscriptions provide the majority of the filtering power.
We don't use MAPS and we are stopping about 99+% of
What I want to determine is whether Declude Junkmail is worth using without
the mail-abuse.org subscriptions
it is, and so it IMGate, for the same reasons
, or whether those subscriptions provide the
majority of the filtering power.
they don't, here's the rejects report of a user of IMGate who
What I want to determine is whether Declude Junkmail is worth using
without
the mail-abuse.org subscriptions, or whether those subscriptions provide
the
majority of the filtering power.
As far as I know, most of us Declude users do not use the paid subscription
lists as there are many other
During a penetration test, the type and version of our email server was
detected. Is there any way to disable the banner information that the
Imail server gives out? If this question has been asked before, i
apologize for the redundancy.
Thanks in advance,
Mark
To Unsubscribe:
Declude by itself, though an awsome product that I can do nothing but
praise, did not solve all of our SPAM problems. It blocked about 75-85%.
When we added the SNIFFER, it stopped almost all of the spam.
Both Declude and Sniffer support automatic downloads, so the system nearly
runs itself.
During a penetration test, the type
type? you mean brand?
and version of our email server was detected.
I've never heard anybody being bothered about this (PIX smtp fixup hides
it but smtp fixup is broken).
Who considers this a security vulnerability worth fixing ?
Len
To Unsubscribe:
Hey, does anyone have the URL for this SNIFFER program?
Thanks,
CV
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael E.
Cummins
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] mail-abuse.org subscriptions and
At 01:07 PM 3/17/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Declude by itself, though an awsome product that I can do nothing but
praise, did not solve all of our SPAM problems. It blocked about 75-85%.
When we added the SNIFFER, it stopped almost all of the spam.
Both Declude and Sniffer support automatic
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/
Sincerely,
Grant Griffith, Vice President
EI8HT LEGS Web Management Co., Inc.
http://www.getafreewebsite.com
877-483-3393
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Che Vilnonis
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003
Monday, March 17, 2003 you wrote:
LC Who considers this a security vulnerability worth fixing ?
Those who prey.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
Monday, March 17, 2003 you wrote:
CV Hey, does anyone have the URL for this SNIFFER program?
http://www.sortmonster.com/
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
http://www.sortmonster.com
-- Original Message --
From: Che Vilnonis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:18:53 -0500
Hey, does anyone have the URL for this SNIFFER program?
Thanks,
CV
-Original Message-
No, according to my carefully saved screen dumps I have used SMTP monitoring
since day one...the only addition has been DNS which I have now turned off
and restarted the Monitor service, but to no avail, the lines keep on
coming!
Well, those lines *should* be there if you are using SMTP
Yes, it showed brand and version. The reasoning for fixing this is that
if a potential intruder knows the version of the mail server, they can
tailor their exploit attempt accordingly, using known hack attempts (if
any) against the mail server.
At 12:15 PM 3/17/2003 -0600, you wrote:
During
During a penetration test, the type and version of our email server was
detected.
That is quite normal.
Is there any way to disable the banner information that the Imail server
gives out? If this question has been asked before, i apologize for the
redundancy.
There is a registry hack that
Yes they can be changed on the advanced tab for each service. DO NOT change
this for the IMAP4 service as it is known to cause some IMAP4 clients fits
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: Re:
Folks --
If it is not too much of a proprietary issue, could any of you who are
in the business of supporting email for a number of clients share
your email hosting agreement with this list? Or with me privately if
the list is too public a forum. What I mean is: what is in your
agreement to
| Is this SNIFFER part of Declude?
No. SNIFFER is not part of Declude.
However, we do what we can to make sure SNIFFER and Declude work
together seamlessly.
_M
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
Can you gurus try this and see what you get ?
I telnet to mail.pakstar.com port 25 (a customer)
and get a 421 error (same error as my smtp log shows)
I call I-mail tech support and they try it and get a connect failed.
The mail.pakstar.com host at 208.57.210.46 is offline (unplugged).
Why do I
Can you gurus try this and see what you get ?
I telnet to mail.pakstar.com port 25 (a customer)
and get a 421 error (same error as my smtp log shows)
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/[EMAIL PROTECTED] shows
a timeout when connecting to mail.pakstar.com.
Do you have a firewall that might be
Cris,
I attempted to telnet (via Putty) to port 25 and it does not answer, nor does
port 110 for kicks. Do you have a firewall in front of this mailserver that is
blocking the above ports?
Keith
-Original Message-
From: Cris Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why do I still get a 421 ?
DNS prob, or net outage *not* affecting you.
What do y'all get ?
Nothing--connect failed.
-Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm getting a 421 when I telnet to port 25 on 208.57.210.46 from
my mail server -- I'll call my ISP to see if they are playing with
SMTP.
Thanks guys - I appreciate it!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, March 17,
I have a single user that can't send any mail out of her account. Whenever
she tries to send anything it is getting dropped in a -NUL.
Here is the log line I am seeing from her account when she sends:
03:17 14:59 SMTP-(0790) ldeliver phoenix.k12.or.us don.wolff-NUL (1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0
I
Thre is most likely a rule that is deleting her messages and moving it to
the in -NUL.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Don Wolff
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 3:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Account
What if one server's Performance Options are set to optimize for
applications while the other server is set for background services.
-David
-Original Message-
From: Rasmus Aaen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 7:55 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [IMail
ldeliver phoenix.k12.or.us don.wolff-NUL
Who is Don Wolff? Check Imail Rules.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
Never mind my first response.
I know who you are. (Or so.)
Check Imail Rules.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
Here is the log line I am seeing from her account when she sends:
03:17 14:59 SMTP-(0790) ldeliver phoenix.k12.or.us don.wolff-NUL (1)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 0
The -NUL is typically used by IMail rules that delete E-mail -- could
there be any rules set up that her E-mails are failing?
If I remember correctly on 3/17/03 3:26 PM John Tolmachoff wrote:
Never mind my first response.
I know who you are. (Or so.)
Check Imail Rules.
Yep, it is rules issue. Now the fun of figuring out which one:)
Thanks guys!
Regards,
-Don
There are 3 ways to avoid criticism: Be Nothing, Do
If I remember correctly on 3/17/03 3:39 PM R. Scott Perry wrote:
The -NUL is typically used by IMail rules that delete E-mail -- could
there be any rules set up that her E-mails are failing?
Regards,
-Don
If you don't understand what it is that I do, then kindly get out of my way
while I do
If I remember correctly on 3/17/03 3:39 PM R. Scott Perry wrote:
The -NUL is typically used by IMail rules that delete E-mail -- could
there be any rules set up that her E-mails are failing?
Sorry for the trouble guys. I was able to find it! There was a rule that
contained the name traci in
thanks
for the replies Eric.
I
copied the imail folder from C:\ directly to d:\ which is a local
drive. I then made sure the same inheritable permissions were on the
d:\imail folder as the c:\imail. I double checked (after reading your post) for
read only permissions and didn't find any.
Those of you using declude junkmail, which version do you use? Is it
worth popping for the Pro version or does Standard do the job good
enough?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
This is totally dependant on the level of control you want to provide.
The major difference is that Pro has the outgoing scanning and the
ability to do per user setups.
Pro is definitely useful if you want the per user capabilities and the
outgoing scanning helps to catch AUP violations.
Jeff
I looked at the SortMonster Message Sniffer but it only talks about
being able to install it with declude. I'm sure it must support native
imail but it doesn't say how.
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
55 matches
Mail list logo
