Roger:
I have created a not ready for prime time process to get the
forwarding information. In a batch file (or could run it as command
line), I run the following to get the directories containing forward.ima
files.
cd\users
dir forward.ima /s i:forwardingreport.txt
Then I use a little VB
just noted typo: drop ing in batch line
should be dir forward.ima /s i:forwardreport.txt
John
John Carter wrote:
Roger:
I have created a not ready for prime time process to get the
forwarding information. In a batch file (or could run it as command
line), I run the following to get the
here's a bat file that will list the forwards and where they are forwarding...
watch the wrap on the for line. also, you'll need to specify your imail directory
and location for saving... bob
@echo off
echo.
echo This batch looks for the file named forward.ima in each users
echo directory. It
Hi,
Anyone using postgres and Imail 8? do I need to get a different
odbuser.dll for Imail?
Thanks.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Friend.ly.net.]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
What is the easiest, fastest way to move mail from one Inbox to another?
Thanks
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
What is the easiest, fastest way to move mail from one Inbox to another?
The Imail Client Tool, you should find it in your programs folder with the
Imail Admin.
Billy
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
Some people in my office are complaining of mail problems. While I always
assume it's the ID10T error, I do have second thoughts on my mail servers.
I run virtual hosts, and I do have a reverse lookup pointing to the root
domain. Personally I think I'm getting too many smtp failed messages. The
Some people in my office are complaining of mail problems. While I always
assume it's the ID10T error, I do have second thoughts on my mail servers.
What I would do in this case is instead of trying to figure out if you have
too many error messages (which are usually caused by the remote end), I
Yes I do this throughout the day. But after downloading the Analyzer and
seeing all those errors, I thought it wouldn't hurt to ask.
9 times out of 10 the employee spells the email address wrong and such. I
just wanted to double check I was on the right path. Thanks.
Cory
-Original
I am using PHP to send
messages to a list of users. I just switched to Imail
and find that emails sent through the PHP mail function do not get delivered to
Hotmail addresses.
Any clue of
how to configure Imail to overcome this problem?
Regards
Johnny Tarcica
I am using PHP to send messages to a list of users. I just switched to
Imail and find that emails sent through the PHP mail function do not get
delivered to Hotmail addresses.
Any clue of how to configure Imail to overcome this problem?
If that is true, then it sounds like either the PHP
I know that sending through remote gateway replaces the rdeliver lines
with gdeliver lines, but does it still retain all the recipient/recipient
host data that we see now in our 'rdeliver' lines?
Imail logs the envelope sende/reipient, yes. What you gateway logs is
something else, but relaying
something else, but relaying is not delivery, so relaying should not
change
the envelope information.
That's what I thought but just wasn't sure.
Thanks
-David
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
I find in the rejected emails that the offensive line is:
Received: from EXITOSEGURO [127.0.0.1] by localhost with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-7.15) id A1277D7600AC; Tue, 27 May 2003 13:40:39 -0500
I compared the headers in emails sent directly trough Imail and those
sent through PHP and found the
These are the logs I get:
connect 66.221.34.145 port 1734
20030527 013107 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (86BD009C) [66.221.34.145] EHLO
localhost
20030527 013107 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (86BD009C) [66.221.34.145] MAIL
FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
20030527 013107 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (86BD009C) [66.221.34.145
I did find this (or at least a header) on the archives, however, it is taking
an extremely long time to load.
I am trying to use delivery rules to filter out spam, etc. However, only a few
messages actually get filtered and sent to junk. I am running IMail Server
7.07.
On my travels
IMail
server to make sure that it is a valid host name (such as
mail.example.com, or example.com, not localhost).
What do the IMail SMTP log files show (in the SMTP or SMTP- lines)?
20030527 013107 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (86BD009C) [66.221.34.145] EHLO localhost
The SMTPD lines just show E-mail
)?
20030527 013107 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (86BD009C) [66.221.34.145] EHLO
localhost
The SMTPD lines just show E-mail arriving on the IMail server, which
won't help solve the problem (although localhost appears again here --
it
would be wise to get rid of that, as it shouts out THIS IS SPAM! to
many
http://www.famhost.com/support/files.zip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of James Young
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Delivery Rules Storing Search Strings
I did find this (or at least a
Please forgive my ignorance, but where do I get the IMail SMTP log
files?
That can depend on your settings.
You'll want to go to the SMTP settings in the IMail Administrator, and
check to see where they are being logged to.
Normally, though, the SMTP or SMTP- (which it is depends on your
Is there a utility
that will convert .dbx files to .mbx files?
Thanks for you
help!
Tyler
spoke
too soon. this one seems to work.
http://people.freenet.de/ukrebs/dbxconv.html
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Tyler
JensenSent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 4:05 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ipswitch. comSubject: [IMail
Hi all,
Can someone please tell me if IMail version 8.0 elliminates the
requirement for individual IPs per domain? We went the virtual route
with version 7.x and our hosting customers positively HATE the
'name%domain.com' username formatting requirement.
If IMail has addressed this in version
Why do they hate the name%domain.com, you only ever have to set it up once?
Once you have it done, you never have to look at it again, then for web
based, you can change the name to EMAIL and an @ works just fine from there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
David,
If your clients aren't fond of entering their full email address for the web
interface, you could also modify the login scripts to automatically append
the domain for their account based on the URL they're using to access their
email. So if they were connecting to
What mailserver have you seen that did not require some form of the full
email address for auth when using multiple virtual domains? The only
one I ever used like that could not have user overlap, i.e. you could
not have [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the same server.
The problem is
I guess I don't understand what the problem is. What I think I
understand to be the problem is your users don't like to put their full
email address in as account name in their mail client and/or on the
webmail login? I don't understand how that could be such a big issue.
Am I missing something?
Sandy,
Since my posting really only pertained to NT auth, this discussion is
pointless if Nikhil is using something else for his portal. Just to see
where the discussion goes...
Well, the server has to know the clear-text password during the
original login, no? This is where I was
Ives,
I'm confused: are we actually talking about the same project, or have
we veered off and are dealing with different envts/objectives?
If the authentication is integrated with NT, the application should
never see the password...
Unless you're referring to *browser* authentication (I
Fresh new install of Version 8, imported registry and user folders from
old server.
Everything looks good except for.
We can no longer send through this server from the outside addresses.
SMTP Settings
Relay mail for
No check mark in Disable SMTP AUTH Reporting
What am I missing?
It worked in our
Hi,
We have good amount of experience in Imail customization and development.
Please contact us if you have any development requirements.
Sumit ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
_
Himalayan holiday! Waiting to be won.
We have good amount of experience in Imail customization and
development. Please contact us if you have any development
requirements.
Uh, thanks for the promo. This is a vendor-hosted tech support list
that, per the archives, you've never posted to before. Your free
What am I missing?
Well, *we're* missing your logs, both server and client.
Do you see failed authentication on the server side?
-Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL
Can someone please tell me if IMail version 8.0 elliminates the
requirement for individual IPs per domain? We went the virtual
route with version 7.x and our hosting customers positively HATE the
'name%domain.com' username formatting requirement.
Since others have guessed both ways,
From where I can access the anti spam administration console. I do
not find any folder (AntiSpam) under the localhost directory.
Well, that's where it definitely would be. I'd suggest an uninstall
and reinstall...and, just to double-check, are you running the 8.0
IADMIN, or do you
Hi Sandy,
The version is 7.15
I've reinstalled the Imail server...but still I'm unable to find anti spam
administration console.
Riz
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 10:26 AM
Subject:
I've reinstalled the Imail server...but still I'm unable to find
anti spam administration console.
IMail Anti-spam starts with 8.
-Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail:
37 matches
Mail list logo
