Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but that looks a lot like a header and
not much like an mbox delimiter.
That is the format--_if_ the data is transported in a header. However,
it is not a MUST to use the header. RFC 1123 clarifies:
The MAIL FROM: information may be passed
|
|From: Rick Klinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Killer WebMail and attachments
|Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:07:56 -0600
|Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
|Melissa,
|
|Have you set the limit within the config_AttachmentKBLimit.cgi file?:
|
Rick,
Per my email, I orginally
Jeffery Rehm wrote:
I can't seem to find a way to do this, but is there a way for IMail to
authenticate when using a gateway? There is a service that I can use to
relay mail for me to get around this AOL, EarthLink, etc. thing where
they won't accept mail from servers on dynamically assigned
Ok, tried this and it seems to be working. I'm relaying through an ISP I
have an email account with. Weird why it would work with this ISP and not
with my cable provider.
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeffery Rehm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
Per my email, I orginally set both the config file and
the IMal admin attachment size to 0 , which is supposed to
allow unlimited attachments. It was interpreted by the server
as literally zero and nothing would attach. Next, I went to
the knowledge base and found the max size
I'm going crazy - I've got the demo of IMail 8 set up and working really
well with no relay and Authentication required.
(Several virtual domains, one IP)
About 20% of the mail my clients send to GOOD email addresses some aol,
others not, that bounces back
as unknown host from OUR server.
This
Which domains? AIOL, RR.Com and do DNS test before accepting mail. If your
DNS is setup in correctly thyew will bounce your mail. Tell us the domains
so we can test your setup and let you know.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
About 20% of the mail my clients send to GOOD email addresses some aol,
others not, that bounces back
as unknown host from OUR server.
This is very upsetting to them and me because before IMail these emails
worked fine.
WHAT can I do to fix this? I am desperate for help on this!
What do your
- Original Message -
From: Vincent JOrdan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 08:31
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Authentication for gateway
Jeffery Rehm wrote:
I can't seem to find a way to do this, but is there a way for IMail to
authenticate when
Can't get a static IP. I'm using DynDNS with cable. I run my business out
of my house and nothing is available with a static address. Too far from
the CO for DSL and I can't get a T1 without paying the construction cost of
running new lines from about 5 miles away.
- Original Message
Weird why it would work with this ISP and not with my cable
provider.
Not that weird, if the cable provider is known to pass spam through
their smart hosts as well as directly from their customer ranges.
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief
Oops. There were 2 more lines above that:
02:27 16:02 SMTPD(42E90108) [10.0.0.14] connect 10.0.0.21 port 3551
02:27 16:02 SMTPD(42E90108) [10.0.0.21] EHLO Durango
...but they don't look like Authentication.
Todd Holt
Xidix Technologies, Inc
Las Vegas, NV USA
702.319.4349
www.xidix.com
On Saturday, February 28, 2004, 13:23:54, Sanford Whiteman wrote:
RFC 2821 is not a standard, BTW.
Since I often reference RFC 2821 this made me pause, think about it for
a bit, then head over to rfc-editor.org to do some research. Didn't
help much so I fired off a question to the editor.
Rod Dorman wrote:
*
* I'm a little bit confused about the status of RFC 2821. On the list of
* Standards http://www.rfc-editor.org/categories/rfc-standard.html it
* has:
* RFC0821 (STD0010) Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (Obsoleted by: RFC2821)
* RFC1869 (STD0010) SMTP Service
BTW, I'm interpreting the above to mean that it is appropriate to
reference RFC 2821 for expected SMTP behaviour.
Hmm...if I were building an SMTPD from scratch, sure, but it's not to
be expected after the fact for all platforms (and IMail is far from
alone in being closer to 821 than
Why must IMail buck convention? -- why not create the return-path
header?
Your guess is as good as mine. :)
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So is it clear that the use of return-path is required; mail
systems MUST support it, and since IMail does not, it is RFC-wrong?
It's not RFC-wrong. RFC 2821 is not mature enough to be a standard.
Implementations that claim to be RFC-compliant need only comply with
821. Any perusal
Jeffery Rehm wrote:
Can't get a static IP. I'm using DynDNS with cable. I run my business out
of my house and nothing is available with a static address. Too far from
the CO for DSL and I can't get a T1 without paying the construction cost of
running new lines from about 5 miles away.
Jeff,
Unless things have changed significantly in the last 6 months, Lightpath is
not available in my area. It is primarily in the NY Metro area. Already
checked into this. I'm in Wappingers Falls.
- Original Message -
From: Vincent JOrdan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
first of all, sorry for not responding sooner, I had some problems
with this account of my email address so that I can't see emails from
this mailing list
Pada 18-Feb-2004, Gerry Massat menulis:
Techy wrote:
Some of my users can not post to the list they are subscribing to. The
message is:
20 matches
Mail list logo
