I did have a rule for [Imail Forum] and had these subjects moved to an iMail
folder. Going up to 8.11 made those hit on any email and so because it was
the first in the rule list for the domain all mail now went to my iMail
folder. Not until I removed the [ and ] did things come back to normal.
The first domain I plan to bring live on my 8.12 IMail server has a customer
list of 3,500+. KWM allows you to see exactly 5 names at a time, and with
no way to increase the screen size or search by name, that I can see. This
is severly inadequate for handling a large contact list, so perhaps
The first domain I plan to bring live on my 8.12 IMail server has a customer
list of 3,500+. KWM allows you to see exactly 5 names at a time, and with
no way to increase the screen size or search by name, that I can see. This
is severly inadequate for handling a large contact list, so perhaps
1. What is the RFC violation that this test looks for? I'd like to talk to
MS and hear their response.
It's a technical violation, which means that they can easily say We don't
care (or, You're reading the RFC wrong). They already chose to violate
one of the RFCs for Outlook 2003 (unless they
The only rule in place, and the only *.ima file is for x-imail-sp*m (changed
so others rules don't catch it here). Didn't skip 8.11, and to be honest,
there are no patches in the picture either, all full installs, I don't do
the Ipswitch patches on production machines if at all possible.
-HJ
Title: Message
This
happened after my upgrade too. Just recreate the rules file. I
renamed rules.ima to rules.ima.old and recreated the rules.ima files and all
worked fine after that.
Good
Luck!
Samantha
-Original Message-From: Rudy Pieruccini
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There was a syntax change in the rules in one of the latest upgrades
Very nice...there was no mention of this in the release notes.
From: Jim Comerford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
Why does Imail provide such poor language Packs for Webmail?
I needed some hours just to clear the biggest mistakes and make it understandeble.
There are german native speakers at Ipswitch...maybe they should pass
them to S. Rock from their company. He definitly can speak German...
Has anybody
Best Free combo I have found
Spybot
And
Spyware blaster
Cwshredder for killing coolwebsearch.
Thank You
Ara B. Carrano
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Samuel J Stanaitis
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 6:00 PM
To: [EMAIL
Why does Imail provide such poor language Packs for Webmail?
Which version?
I've translated the v6 and v7 templates to german (without help files).
Don't ask me why IPSwitch has published only v6 on their website. I've
provided them both versions.
The v7 templates are completely separated
Why does Imail provide such poor language Packs for Webmail?
Which version?
It's V8
The v7 templates are completely separated (HTML and words/phrases)
So anyone can translate it easily in any other language (around 1500 lines)
They are so poorly translated that it is in many cases
The v7 templates are completely separated (HTML and
words/phrases) So
anyone can translate it easily in any other language (around 1500
lines)
They are so poorly translated that it is in many cases
impossible to get the right meaning from the german and
you have to compare it
Hi all,
I bought imail few months ago. I have version 8.05 after some patches etc...
Before I used to have the trial version with no problems. however as soon as I
installed the prfessional version I started to have problems.
Basically I get this erros from 2 to 3 times a day:
Application
Have you excluded the Imail spool directory - and users directory from the
Norton AV program? This needs to be done if it has not.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Carlos Trallero
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 7:24 AM
To: [EMAIL
See:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61759-2004Jun22.html
Large Internet providers typically monitor traffic on their networks and
pinpoint machines that are sending out inordinate amounts of e-mail. When
such machines are found, some Internet providers block their Internet
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61759-2004Jun22.html
Please do not post links that require registration to view -- it's pretty
rude (if you *must* post one, at least make it clear that you need to
register).
For those of you who refuse (or are technically unable ) to block
The customer will use the contacts for bulk mailings, but primarily wants
them available when sending individual emails.
In KWM, the address book seems to be an afterthought. I just wonder what I
give up if I replace it with a different package like IceWarp.
Bill
- Original Message -
The following is the header information for an email marked SPAM. This is a
newsletter that we do not want marked as spam. I have checked IMAIL URL
black list and the url rs6.net does not appear on the list in any form.
Where else do I look to remove this rule to allow this email to pass?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A61759-2004Jun22.html
Please do not post links that require registration to view -- it's pretty
rude (if you *must* post one, at least make it clear that you need to
register).
sorry to waste your time. I've been registered a long time and forgot
Have you updated you list recently? If so, did you restart the queue
manager?
Tripp
- Original Message -
From: Brian Lenane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 12:08 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] SPAM-URL-DBL
The following is the header
-- even the list you posted had about about a 15% false positive ratio;
prove it. you make claims and don't back them up with numbers, so your
claims are self-serving FUD.
Len, if I didn't say it before, let me say it now -- I don't want to argue
with you. It was entertaining in the past,
Tripp,
I have not sure that the url rs6.net was ever on the URL black list, I did
restart the queue but I do no think it will make any difference. Any other
suggestions?
Regards,
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tripp Allen
Sent:
Len, if I didn't say it before, let me say it now -- I don't want to argue
with you.
I say back up your 15% claim with stats and you weasel out saying I
don't want to argue.
Len
_
http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training : Denver;
Title: Disable or Re-Route Bounces From Inbound Copy Rule
I've got an account on an iMail server with an inbound rule to copy all emails to my SprintPCS phone. This works really well. I usually get an SMS message within 10 seconds of receiving an email. I was recently notified however that
I can say with 100% certainty it is affecting OE 6. In-house, we only use
OE 6, and it is affecting all our internal mail. Every time someone in our
own office sends me an email, it is marked as spam because of CMDSPACE. In
addition, we have clients where we configured their email clients for
Depending on what the user has installed for applications in many cases is
saves time to just backup the users data they wipe the machine.
To really save time after installing the machine and installing all patches
make an image copy of the system so if the spyware/adware gets out of hand
you
Title: Disable or Re-Route Bounces From Inbound Copy Rule
We had a similar problem, and I believe the
deal was that Sprint was actually denying the messages, because the account was
full. Apparently it keeps a copy of all messages, so that you have to go into
their website and delete all
it bounces the message back to the original sender, even though they
weren't the ones trying to email my sprint account.
Not surprising. The envelope sender is retained.
The weird part is that I'm receiving all the SMS messages fine on my
phone, so I don't know why the bounce is even being
Amen to that! The last one of these I did took 4 1/2 hours. If I had
the option of a wipe/restart I would have saved a ton of time.
Along these lines... I have another one on the horizon (I sent the
user off to back up their data files... only a matter of time until
they come back).
This is a
R. Scott Perry post:
Len, if I didn't say it before, let me say it now -- I don't want to argue
with you. It was entertaining in the past, but I've got more important
things to do. I think most people on this list have a pretty good idea of
my expertise in this area, and my level of trust.
If this continues, can you send me off list a copy of your url black list
and a copy of a message that got caught, and the sys and spam logs for when
it happened?
Thanks,
Tripp
- Original Message -
From: Brian Lenane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004
The bounce email just contains this message:
Delivery failed 20 attempts: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original message follows.
As long as the outbound rule will apply to postmaster emails, I should
be okay. I know better than trying to debug Sprint's oddities. It
doesn't seem like this happens very
R. Scott Perry post:
Len posted:
I can read, John, thanks for trying.
I say back up your 15% claim with stats and you weasel out saying I
don't want to argue.
Len please!
try reading yourself, John:
I post to the list about ASTA.
Scott again spews his 15% FUD about 15%, wasting his apparently
I'd try turning on verbose logging. You should get something more
informative then.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Zach Greenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Disable or Re-Route Bounces From Inbound
Hi John,
On second thought, I would like to take advantage of your offer. Please
send me an email for your OE account to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include
the version number, if you would. For example, I am sending this from OE
with version number 6.00.2800.1123 (I got this from Help - About).
The bounce email just contains this message:
Logs are where you'd look.
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!
Problem with retail pack computers are they do not always include the actual
MS OS disk. They often only include the OEM restore disk.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Yup. The unit in question is a vaio desktop. My own vaio laptop has
O/S disks, but thats an old win2k model. We'll see. bah. was hoping
for a magic cmdline switch or something to tell me where the XP
'format' install option is.
--
--Matt Robertson--
MSB Designs, Inc.
To Unsubscribe:
also make sure there is only 1 imail1* on the machine
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lee Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail web messaging can't send mail
Just installed IMail,
their recommendatin is to block networks that spew spam and
infections from subscribe IPs direct to our MXs...For those of you
who refuse (or are technically unable ) to block subscriber networks
by PTR hostname...
That article doesn't say anything about a PTR-based detection
My thanks for John and several others that responded to my request. I
received several responses from OL 2003 and a couple from OE 6 (and I found
another machine to test myself). Here is the strange and unexpected (to me)
part: all of these test messages came through without failing the CMDSPACE
I don't understand why John's message was unaffected by CMDSPACE, while my
test messages (both in-office and from my home), using the same exact
version of OE, failed the test. The only other difference that I can see is
that our messages were internal to our server, whereas John's message (and
FYI, I can help test more later after I am back in my office.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL
I have just upgraded our Imail from 8.05 to 8.12 this morning and all
went well. I have been playing around with the new version of Ldap and
was wondering if there is a command line option to synchronize it.
Forgive me if this has been answered previously, but I did search the
docs, list archives
Thanks, Scott. That was the enlightenment I needed. Of course, now I have
to figure out what to do so that the test won't flag our own clients. The
only solutions seem to be to either turn off the test (which would be a
pity) or whitelist our clients. We don't have IMail 8.x, so we can't use
Hi,
I have the following rule behaving quite strangely
H~X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALHELO!AND!H~X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALREVDNS!OR!H~X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALHEL
O!AND!H~X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALFROM!OR!H~X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALREVDNS!AND!H~X-IMAIL-SPAM-
VALFROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I run the test on the rule and get the following results:
Sorry I forgot to mention that I'm running Imail 8.12
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Deslauriers
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 5:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Misbehaving Rule!
Hi,
I have the following rule
When the login page is being loaded I get the error in IE as
a popup
A runtime error has occurred.
Would you like to debug?
Line: 450
Error: OptfontSize
is undefined
I am using Imail 8 and killer WebMail
templates
Ipswitch support said
to update the language packs but that
In rules with multiple conditions (AND, OR) the conditions are handled in
left to right order. So, your rule is:
exp1 and exp2 or exp3 and exp4 or exp5 and exp6:copy...
This is being evaluated this way:
exp1 and exp2) or exp3) and exp4) or exp5) and exp6
For this rule to be true, the
That article doesn't say anything about a PTR-based detection method,
nor is there anything in the actual white paper.
so?
What ASTA says is
that unspecified (unreasonable?) levels of misbehavior _may_ result
in blocking a whole ISP--this statement is meant to include _all_ mail
from an
Tripp,
Let's say I want to filter on any combination of 2 from the following:
VALFROM, VALREVDNS, VALHELO.
Would it be possible to do it all in a single rule?
This is what I would like to combine into one (it's currently split in 2
'cause of the weird behavior of the first condition)
Rule 1
Thanks for all the input.
I've compiled a list of what was recommended:
Spybot (1.3)
Adaware 6
HiJack This!
Pest Patrol
Spyware Blaster http://www.javacoolsoftware.com/spywareblaster.html
http://www.spysweeper.com/remove-coolwebsearch.html
http://www.comparespywareremovers.com/
SpySubstract
exactly. it is quite amazing that such corporate committee-decided
policy actually has interest vs weasally, toothless play-it-safe.
Let's see if they have the conviction to put some bite into behind
their bark.
Yes, let's!
But let's not pretend that they ever talked about
Dan,
There's lots of pages on the web with bad code in them, not just the
webmail pages. IE likes to point out these flaws if you let it.
Try changing your IE options:
Tools: InternetOptions: Advanced TAB: Browsing:
put a check in the box to "disable script debugging".
--
Doug
[EMAIL
But let's not pretend that they ever talked about PTR-based
I nor anybody pretended they talked about PTR-based filtering. But if
someone wants to block subscriber networks, then PTR filtering is much more
efficient than trying to figure out the 10's or 100's of Class C's that are
This is a Windows XP Home system. Anyone know how to wipe such a
machine completely clean via a format and full reinstall?
The last
one of these I ran into, I could reinstall XP, but it was over top of
the existing files (may have been due to this being a mfr
'restore'-type disk). What I
Ok, I'm a little confused about something: We have our IMail server set to
No relay in SMTP security.
I was under the impression that in the log analyzer reports, that SMTP
Senders Remote means addresses from which mail was sent through the server
and delivered to remote addresses
But if that's
I have just installed IMail Server and I am able to
receive email but neither I nor my remote users (virtualdomains) can send email
out via web or via Email client.
Can someone help me?
Lewis
Title: Message
What do your logs
show you?
Travis
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jordan
LSent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 9:01 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail Server
Not sending Out Mail
I have
I have just installed IMail Server and I am able to receive email but
neither I nor my remote users (virtualdomains) can send email out via web
or via Email client.
you to upgrade to the Imail sending option.
Len
_
60 matches
Mail list logo
