Hi,
I've already updated the IMail to version 8.12 and
update the Web messaging templates also but the forward icon status in the
Summary page still not there instead the icon is been replaced with the REPLIED
icon status.
Help...
Rgds,
Zul
I've recently been given the task of finding a new virus solution to the
Symantec snap-in. The purpose for this move was the recent Beagle.AG virus
and the inability of Symantec to treat password protected zips differently
than regular zips. Currently with Symantec there is no way to tell it not
I've recently been given the task of finding a new virus solution to the
Symantec snap-in. The purpose for this move was the recent Beagle.AG virus
and the inability of Symantec to treat password protected zips differently
than regular zips. Currently with Symantec there is no way to tell it not
Will Declude plug-in with Trend Micro Server Protect? I saw the list of
compatible scanners and noticed PCScan was listed (now known as
PC-cillin I think). However, PC-cillin is a client piece and not a server
side client. I'm trying to find a way to do this without purchasing more
virus
Will Declude plug-in with Trend Micro Server Protect? I saw the list of
compatible scanners and noticed PCScan was listed (now known as
PC-cillin I think). However, PC-cillin is a client piece and not a server
side client.
As far as I know, Declude Virus will work with all Trend Micro products
I have been using Declude products, include Virus for about 4 years and they
have made a big difference. With the flexibility and features of Declude
Virus, you can not only check all messages for viruses, but also for
vulnerabilities, as well as outright ban different attachments. It also has
the
Is it quiet here today, or am I not getting messages from this list?
=
Marc Funaro, President
Macromedia Certified
Advanced ColdFusion Developer
A D V A N T E XL L C
Technical Consulting Services
5547 State Highway 12
Norwich, NY 13815
quiet times...
anyone hear ANYTHING about the collaboration stuff lately? Wasn't it July
they were suppose to come out with it?
- Original Message -
From: Marc Funaro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: iMail List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 11:05 AM
Subject:
Hello Imail folks,
I'd like to know if anyone has experience including java applets in
web mail templates. Contact me off-list if you wish - though on-list
is probably ok too.
Thanks,
_M
Pete McNeil (Madscientist)
President, MicroNeil Research Corporation
Chief SortMonster
- Original Message -
From: Langston, Cale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will Declude plug-in with Trend Micro Server Protect? I saw the list of
compatible scanners and noticed PCScan was listed (now known as
PC-cillin I think). However, PC-cillin is a client piece and not a server
side client.
anyone hear ANYTHING about the collaboration stuff lately? Wasn't it July
they were suppose to come out with it?
Actually, the information I have said it was scheduled to be released on
April 27, 2004.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced
I've had some bad experiences with pop-up blockers with my clients who use
webmail. I'm using IMAIL 8.1 with KWM and most pop-up blockers stop
messages from opening once a user is logged in. Since Microsoft will be
incorporating a pop-up blocker in SP2 I am concerned that it is going to
royally
- Original Message -
From: Marc Catuogno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 12:50 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Concerns over SP2 pop-up blocking
I've had some bad experiences with pop-up blockers with my clients who use
webmail. I'm using IMAIL 8.1 with KWM and most pop-up
We use DoList here. http://software.dolist.net/
It was a bit of a pain to setup... But once it is running, it is easy to
maintain and runs well.
-Jerod
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Reinhardt
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 11:47 AM
Thank you... that makes me a feel a little better.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Concerns over SP2 pop-up blocking
- Original
I don't remember where I read it.. but you can forget about collaboration
until next year.
Btw: If I recall correctly Ipswitch also talked about a new version of IM in
june or july and so far no news about it.
-Luis Arango
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've been running the release candidates of SP2 for quite a while now with
zero problems. Webmail works fine.
Larry Craddock
- Original Message -
From: Marc Catuogno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 11:50 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Concerns over SP2
In case others run into questions from their
users. I've just heard from a customer that just switched to BellSouth
that BellSouthhas startedblocking port 25 traffic.
So, it's either switch to a different port for your
users, recommendation seems to be port 587,or tell them to use
Hello All,
I was wondering if someone could explain why a particular message is being
routed to the root-bulk mailbox.
I'm running IMail v8.05. The 'WhiteList' section contains the following:
@jetblue.com, @reply.jetblue.com, .jetblue.com', but for some reason the
message keeps being routed to
You need to whitelist the sending server...not the domain. And now it
keeps coming back because *you* are sending it and not in the whitelist
[correctly].
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of L. Kaminski - MDS
Sent: Monday, August 02,
...and I wonder how long before ISPs start blocking 587. Certainly
it doesn't take much for spammers to switch to 587 as well.
The most current concept of 587 is as an _authenticated_ submission
port. IMO, if you have the port open, you should be running AUTH
only on 587 (for any
I wonder how long before ISPs start blocking 587. Certainly it doesn't
take much for spammers to switch to 587 as well.
There is a reason why an RFC defined port 587 when port 25 already existed. :)
Port 25 is used for any SMTP connections -- from MUA (mail client) to MTA
(mail server) and
I was wondering if someone could explain why a particular message is being
routed to the root-bulk mailbox.
By default, IMail v8's anti-spam sends spam to root-bulk.
I'm running IMail v8.05.
The catch with IMail v8.08 is that whitelists aren't really whitelists, but
instead cause an E-mail to
I was assuming that virus spammers might be able to use MAPI profiles to
send using the proper authentication.
If that's not the case, then why switch to 587? Let's just strongly
encourage everyone to use AUTH and keep from having to walk every user in
the world through switch their outgoing
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the clarifications. So you're saying 587 should not be used for
MUA - MTA traffic? So there's no need or intention for users to switch to
587 in the their mail client?
If we need to listen on both 25 and 587, does IMail support that? I haven't
seen anything that allowed
But, AFAIK, Imail can not be configured to accept/listen on port 25 for all
SMTP traffic AND accept/listen on port 587 for only authenticated traffic,
i.e. no relay.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the clarifications. So you're saying 587 should not be used for
MUA - MTA traffic?
Sorry, that should have been port 587 traffic is *only* used for MUA-MTA
traffic.
If we need to listen on both 25 and 587, does IMail support that? I haven't
seen anything that allowed IMail to
While a firewall can certiianly do port forwarding, that would not prevent
some one from using 587 if forwarded to 25 if relay settings were improperly
set.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
Migrating to port 587 for AUTH doesn't really seem useful. Unless there is
an end goal of separating MTA - MTA traffic from MUA - MTA traffic, it
seems to me that SMTP AUTH should be used everywhere on port 25...no need to
move everything to a separate port except due to ISPs who choose to shut
Thanks Scott!
From the looks of things, I'm inclined to think it's a
temporary glitch, too.
If I can extract any more relevant info, I'll let you
know.
Thanks for all your help!
(And thanks for dnsstuff.com! I can't tell you how much
I use and value this terrific resource!!!)
Dev
We're running Imail 8.11 (soon to be 8.12) and when an email arrives
with an especially long link, it's truncated. For example:
http://jabba.ipswitch.com/query.html?col=kbcol=imlguideqp=qt=hyperlink+cu
t%7C+imailqt2=qs=template=kbqc=kb+wsftpug+imlguide+wugguide+ftpsrvug+iim
Hi
We've just upgraded to v8.12 from v7.15. Love the new anti-spam
functionality, but see a major benefit in being able to update the
statistics in the word lists. I'm trying to work out the best way of
handling this as it would appear short of adding a word manually, you have
to have the email
This doesn't have anything to do with IMail...it's your mail client software
that's doing it. HTML-formatted emails shouldn't have an issue, but text
emails that wrap may not be properly handled in many mail clients.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Tellefsen, Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migrating to port 587 for AUTH doesn't really seem useful. Unless there is
an end goal of separating MTA - MTA traffic from MUA - MTA traffic, it
seems to me that SMTP AUTH should be used everywhere on port 25...no need to
move everything to a separate port except due to ISPs who choose to shut
We've just upgraded to v8.12 from v7.15. Love the new anti-spam
functionality, but see a major benefit in being able to update the
statistics in the word lists. I'm trying to work out the best way of
handling this as it would appear short of adding a word manually, you have
to have the email in a
Hi Scott
Thanks for the reply. I think I didn't explain myself very well. I guess the
question is how do I effectively make the system learn? Will it do it
automatically (how, what's the intelligence like), or will I need to provide
good and spam emails for it to work on?
In the past we've used
Thanks for the reply. I think I didn't explain myself very well. I guess the
question is how do I effectively make the system learn? Will it do it
automatically (how, what's the intelligence like), or will I need to provide
good and spam emails for it to work on?
For it to work as designed, each
Gotcha...I'll look it up. Thanks, Scott.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] BellSouth now blocking port 25
Migrating to port 587 for AUTH doesn't really seem
Hi,
I've already updated the IMail to version 8.12 and
update the Web messaging templates also but the forward icon status in the
Summary page still not there instead the icon is been replaced with the REPLIED
icon status.
Help...
Rgds,
Zul
Please contact me off list.
You have some DNS problems and you are sending e-mail with Outlook CR
Vulnerabilities.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
one other comment I should have said... I do not monitor these mailboxes as
there is really no need... I have to trust that my users are doing this
correctlyIf you do want to monitor them just use either Web Messaging or
set up these userid in your client as IMAP
Eric S
- Original Message
Here is something that I wrote up to automate the spamseeder process...pay
attention to the assumptions (change if necessary) and values that are not
in your configuration and adjust accordingly. Personally I schedule this to
run every hour. just watch out for wrapping in your mail client.. I have
42 matches
Mail list logo
