Hi John,
That means you are an open relay, and are allowing spam through your server.
That's what I thought, hence the need to change.
Cheers,
Julian Voelcker
The Virtual World (UK) Limited
Cirencester, United Kingdom
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List
Thank you all for your input. I am currently testing the Declude Product
which raises a question in my mind. Does anyone know what AV products out
there play well with others? I know McAfee wants me to remove all the other
AV products on the box before installing theirs and e-trust wants me to
I can't remember what is was I found that I didn't like with it on 2003.
Perhaps like you mentioned, maybe just because it said it wasn't supported?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aubre' L. Cyriaque
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 9:43
Yea, I've had blackice running on 2003 server for about 6 months. It's
flawless. The folks at ICC (or whatever the company is) state that they don't
support it yet but they have run it and it runs fine. 2003 is not on their
supported list of OSs
John Cesta
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:02:57 -0800
During the upgrade process you will be asked if you want to update the
tables for any domain that runs an external db...This will add the columns
to each table needed. You can also skip this step during the upgrade and run
dbupdate from the command line after the install.
Eric S
- Original
I have just obtained BlackICE Server Protection for my mail servers to stop
the flood of Dictionary attacks we are receiving. I have installed it and I
have made the changes that Cycle Rider suggested, but I would just like to
make sure I have all settings correct (not the edits proposed by Cycle
We are considering moving back to the registry and not using the MS SQL
database for Imail user data. We originally used the database because we
planned to integrate into other programs but that never developed.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:17:02 -0500, Dan Horne wrote:
I have just obtained BlackICE Server Protection for my mail servers
to stop
the flood of Dictionary attacks we are receiving. I have installed
it and I
have made the changes that Cycle Rider suggested, but I would
just like to
make
Thanks, that answers my questions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john cesta
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:00 AM
To: Dan Horne
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Blackice Settings
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:17:02 -0500, Dan Horne wrote:
I
Is anyone out there using bitdefender with declude? I hate to be a pest
with all these questions, but I want to test it all the way.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 7:11 AM
To: [EMAIL
I'm not sure it's working flawlessly for me. After a period of time, the
application starts reporting the intruder address as 0.0.0.0 and the count
increment on that event goes up, and up, and up. I'm not sure if this is
simply a GUI bug or not. It's bugging me regardless.
-Original
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:37:40 -0700, Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks, LLC wrote:
I'm not sure it's working flawlessly for me. After a period of
time, the application starts reporting the intruder address as
0.0.0.0 and the count increment on that event goes up, and up, and
up. I'm not sure if
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone out there using bitdefender with declude? I hate to be a pest
with all these questions, but I want to test it all the way.
I have BitDefender working with Declude Virus on a test server and it works
fine. Let me know
Hi John -
It's a pretty regular Win 03' Std edition box, running iMail, DNS, Declude
JunMail / AV, F-Prot, Sniffer, and now BlackIce. Upon further investigation,
I'm thinking that this is a GUI issue because under the advanced firewall
settings, I do see IPs getting blocked for the time
I've been trying in vain to white list my internal network addresses. Here
is what I've tried so far:
1. Under Trusted Addresses I've tried entering my whole network range as
thus: 192.68.1.0 255.255.255.0. This doesn't work. I still get user
emails caught in my Spam trap.
2. I tried entering
They don't have the trusted addresses setup right, to do that for my
network I had to do 192.168.1.1 with a subnet of 255.255.255.0.
Sam
Andy wrote:
I've been trying in vain to white list my internal network addresses. Here
is what I've tried so far:
1. Under Trusted Addresses I've tried
Bill, if I could get those settings, it would save me a lot of time on the
testing. If you wouldn't mind that is. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jay Sudowski wrote:
At this point, I have BlackIce blocking hosts if they make 3 SMTP errors
in a 90
second period, and I'm only blocking about 30 hosts per hour. More
concerning,
is that my concurrent SMTP sessions are staying absurdly high - anywhere
from 55
concurrent to over 80. My server
We have setup all of our networks in the trusted address list as a.b.c.0
m.a.s.k and all of them function properly. If you put in an address of
a.b.c.d and a mask then only that single address is allowed. Make sure that
you have selected a group of computers when adding the ranges and not a
single
another reason to not put all your eggs in one basket like ICS...
WatchGuard
announces ClamAV powered gateway anti-virus
nervoso - 2004-11-18 07:15 - Clam AntiVirus
WatchGuard
Technologies, Inc. (Nasdaq: WGRD), a leading provider of network
security solutions worldwide, announced
I agree. I looked closer at the reports and the reg: information, which
is the webmail data, starts with 00/01/04 and ends one month short; but
the file: data seems to be correct.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent:
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill, if I could get those settings, it would save me a lot of time on the
testing. If you wouldn't mind that is. Thank you.
Here you go:
SCANFILE C:\PROGRA~1\COMMON~1\Softwin\BITDEF~1\bdc.exe /a /r /i /W /alev=5
/flev=3
I've been running Imail for several years and have never seen this message
before:
It was addressed to postmaster
Subject: Delivery Failure - Orphaned files in spool directory
Message:
--
IMail detected a fatal
Awesome, thank you Bill, I'm going to try it now.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 4:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Delcude Anti-Virus
- Original Message -
From:
Its just some kind of a bug, if you double click on that entry it will take
you to the intruder tab and highlight the info on the intruder, there you
will find the real IP address.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay Sudowski -
Handy
You can set it to the highest setting, and go into the advanced setting and
open ports, SMPT 25, POP 110, Web Mail Port 8383, and Calendaring Port 8484,
then it will work on the highest settings. I especially closed the normally
attacked ports, in fact I think I closed everything then allowed only
You also may want to open up your web calendaring port as well, then close
everything thing else that you are not using. I set ours to paranoid, or
whatever is the highest most secure setting.
I am curious, did you get the server version or the regular version?
-Original Message-
From:
There are 2 SMD file for every message, if one is deleted somehow and the
other one remains, you will get that error. There may also be other reasons
this will happen.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Comerford
Sent: Friday, November
What version of IMail are you running? These are messages the queue manager
is having trouble with. We need those files and the log sent to support so
we can see why it's blown up...If you are not running v 8.14then you need to
upgrade before trying to send those in tho...
Eric S
- Original
I need another Imail unlimited license now but we plan on switching to
SmarterMail once they add ODBC support. (which may be at least 3-6
months).
Anyone who has already switched have an unused Imail unlimited license
they're willing to sell (at a reasonable price ;-).
Please email off-list.
--
Would one use the kill file to enter IP's for rejecting mail from?
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
I think you'll find some takers on this deal...
David Sullivan wrote:
I need another Imail unlimited license now but we plan on switching to
SmarterMail once they add ODBC support. (which may be at least 3-6
months).
Anyone who has already switched have an unused Imail unlimited license
they're
No, the kill file is only for e-mail addresses and the domain part of e-mail
addresses. IP addresses go into a different file.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I had a customer that was using AOL as an ISP and using Outlook configured
for AUTH SMTP on our server. He could not send to one particular user on
our server (in his domain) but could send to others. After testing I
noticed the following in the header:
X-Apparently-From: ERR_USER_NULL
It
I would guess it was how they had the user in their address book - probably
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or maybe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Brumm
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 4:24 PM
To:
the blacklist file?
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
No, the kill file is only for e-mail addresses and the domain part of e-mail
addresses. IP addresses go into a different file.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
I forget the actual file name, but you
do not edit the file. (Although Ipswitch has it in the KB on how to do it.) You
control it through SMTP settings, Control Access.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL
what I'm trying to do is identify certain IP's that are attempting to
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in an attempt to find valid email
addresses. Some research into this is showing that these seem to be
PC's on cable modem's and are an endless list. Anyone using the Control
Access feature in
Yes. If you have IP addresses, or blocks,
that you want to block, that is what it is there for.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Foresman
Sent: Friday,
Hi Travis,
But how would that explain that he could send to a different user on the
same server consistently.
Is MIME Defang 2.43 being used at AOL or am I reading the header
wrong? There are reports of
MIME Defang making messages disappear when I searched it on Google.
X-Apparently-From:
Because they have only one address in the book that is messed up? Just a
guess.
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Brumm
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 7:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
Hello,
I got a complaint today from the client that
yesterday he was having more than 300 mails in his account. But today when he
logged in to his account he got only 3. Previously also we were getting this
type of complaints. But we were ignoring them thinking its not
42 matches
Mail list logo
