I'm running IMail 8.15, and I can't figure out how to make SSL work for
Webmail.
I ran the configuration utility and built a key-pair. The filenames are in
the registry. I cycled the Web Messaging service.
Internet Explorer says Can't find server.
Ethereal trace captures the traffic and the
Some infos from bugtraq:
==
Betreff: IpSwitch IMAP Server LOGON stack overflow
Absender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Datum: 08.06.2005, 00:24
Anhänge: ipswitch.c, Part.txt
--
Hello, attached is a proof of concept for the IpSwitch IMAP
Has anyone verified that this only applies to versions before the latest
hotfixes (Pre 8.20HF2) and that the current versions are immune?
Thanks,
Hello, attached is a proof of concept for the IpSwitch IMAP Server LOGON
stack overflow
To Unsubscribe:
This was fixed in 8.15 HF2 and 8.20 HF2.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Nice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Fwd: IpSwitch IMAP Server LOGON stack overflow
Has anyone verified that this only applies
Matti Haack wrote:
Some infos from bugtraq:
==
Betreff: IpSwitch IMAP Server LOGON stack overflow
Absender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Datum: 08.06.2005, 00:24
Anhänge: ipswitch.c, Part.txt
--
Hello, attached is a proof of concept for
Anyway to setup an alias to bounce?
Yes.. I know I can do an actual mailbox, but I want to know if an alias can
do it.
Thanks
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
On Friday, June 10, 2005, 11:45:16, Beach Computers wrote:
Anyway to setup an alias to bounce?
Umm... sure... just delete it, then any mail sent to it will be
rejected.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The avalanche has already started, it is too
Rod Dorman late for the pebbles
Yes.. I know I can do an actual mailbox, but I want to know if an
alias can do it.
Aliases cannot have individual rules applied. However, domain-level
rules can match on aliases.
--Sandy
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a
Are those of us running 7.15 vulnerable. I seem to remember an URL link in
an earlier thread about this vulnerability that omitted version 7.15 in the
list of vulnerable versions (perhaps that was an oversight). If 7.15 is
vulnerable, will there be a hotfix or are we scr*wed?
Michael Hoyt
For anybody who is interested about the issue of timeouts connecting to
certain mail servers...
It was a bad DNS server. It is one that we use for all internal clients here
on our network without issue. But I set up a new Win 2k dn s server and
replaced that in the IMail server and the
Now THAT is very interesting. What was your old DNS server? Was it an
MS DNS server running W2K/ NT4, or was it a 'nix variant? Anything
unique/special about its config? If MS, are you running Active Directory?
Dev
-Original message-
From: mail-lists [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 10
The vulnerable versions are published at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13727
It does not list 7.15 (closest is 7.12) but I don't know why 7.15 would not
be vulnerable. Not saying that it is, would seem logical that it is
vulnerable.
-Joe
- Original Message -
From: Michael Hoyt
You're telling me. It was literally the last thing that I checked. I tried
putting a dns server inside the smtp service prop of IMail from our isp and got
tons of Stack Connect errors. So I took that out and put the new 2k dns server
in there. Had about 50% failures. Then I removed the
All,
Can anybody tell me which rfc states that mailservers must have a
reverse-lookup?
Thanks,
Jon
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
Weren't these issues addressed in 8.15 HF2? Here is what was fixed in HF2,
for both 8.15 8.2 verisons of IMail
(http://www.ipswitch.com/support/imail/releases/imail_professional/index.html):
IMail Server 8.15 Hotfix 2 - May 23, 2005
This hotfix fixes various IMAP4D32, SMTPD32, QUEUEMGR and
RFC 2821
Justin Dixon, CCNA
CyberSharks.Net, Inc.
http://www.cybersharks.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of list
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 5:03 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] which rfc is it?
All,
Can
None for mailservers specifically, but RFC 1912 states Every
Internet-reachable host should have a name. and then For every IP
address, there should be a matching PTR record in the in-addr.arpa
domain. and Failure to have matching PTR and A records can cause loss
of Internet services similar to
Not required but good practice for any machine to be set up correctly on the
network. BUT are you going to fight city hall? If 90% of mail admins are
requiring it to accept mail from you it doesn't really matter whether it's a
written standard or not.
Eric S
- Original Message -
thank you very much :)
- Original Message -
From: Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 5:27 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] which rfc is it?
None for mailservers specifically, but RFC 1912 states Every
Internet-reachable host should
Can I get an explanation how I can stop an other IP from pretending to be my
domain and send mail to my users.
Our IP: 216.152.171.37 and
IP 66.205.12.246 is NOT curlink.com
Kenneth
=== Following is from my log file
06:10 16:06 SMTPD(f2d9014f00ae1f90) [216.152.171.37] connect 66.205.12.246
You can't keep them from forging your domain name, but you can use SPF to
detect spammers forging your domain name when they send to you.
More info at http://spf.pobox.com
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: copacs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, June
Michael Hoyt wrote:
Are those of us running 7.15 vulnerable. I seem to remember an URL link in
an earlier thread about this vulnerability that omitted version 7.15 in the
list of vulnerable versions (perhaps that was an oversight). If 7.15 is
vulnerable, will there be a hotfix or are we
Hello,
IamrunningthelatestIMailserver8.2withtheHotfixes.
TheSMTPDseemstohangandsometimesjuststopsrunning.Thereisnothinginthelogsortheeventviewer.Noindicationatallastowhattheproblemis.Also,themonitordoesnotrestartit.Ihavetostartitmanually.
23 matches
Mail list logo
