Today's log (following resetting PF_Use, SF_Use and Features_Use to 0 on
Sunday):
SpamContent84
LocalDeliver2971
RemoteDeliver22491
What would I find 84 of in the/which log to match against these?
Any ideas what registry keys I might check?
Heck, here they are:
Global:
X-RCPT-TO: email-address should be in the headers for TO, CC or BCC.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Horne
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 8:57 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail rules on Copyall
OK, but Imail allows you to filter on the TO or the complete HEADERS,
but not the CC: (from within the Imail Admin GUI). How can I set up a
rule to filter on CC:? I assume I will never be able to filter on BCC:
since that doesn't show in the headers. I know I can edit the filter
file manually
Sorry, but there's no such monster in my headers. I know I can use
Declude to add the something like that to the headers, but a lot of our
clients (lawyers and doctors) complained about that because it
effectively broke (in their opinion) BCC:'s by revealing everyone that
was getting the message
The BCC'd X-RCPT-To is in the BCC recipient's email, but NOT in the CC or
TO. All emails eventually turn into a RCPT TO, and by convention, only TO
and CC are reflected in the headers out in the wild. After IMail has
received the message, only then does the BCC name get stuck in only that
Hi all,
I have an Imail 7.15 server. Until today it was working great.
Suddenly users began receiving email from the postmaster with Undeliverable
Mail as the subject.
In the body of the email was:
Invalid final delivery userid: @LOCALHOST
I checked the logs and saw:
ERR
Full headers of the last message you sent to the list follow. As you
can see, there is no X-RCPT-TO: header. In this particular message (and
all list traffic, I assume), my domain name (@taisweb.net) doesn't even
appear in the To: line, meaning this message wouldn't be archived either
with a
Does anyone else here have any major problems with deleting messages after 2
matches with Verify Mail From checked, and using these lists:
SpamCop * bl.spamcop.net
spamhaus * sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
DSBL * list.dsbl.org
sorbs * dnsbl.sorbs.net
abuseat * cbl.abuseat.org
csma *
I was trying to get an answer on how to prevent e-mail from my servers IP
from being delivered to the BULK folder in YAHOO. I see my post in the mail
archive, but I never got it. I have e-mailed declude support twice and just
called them and I don't feel like they are helping. Worries me...
we just use spamcop and spamhaus and delete after one match. no sense in
checking all of those for every message. If you're listed on those two
then you're a spammer in our book.
Mike Biddle wrote:
Does anyone else here have any major problems with deleting messages
after 2 matches with
That is because it is not a Declude issue. It is a Yahoo issue. You need to
contact Yahoo to find out why they have those messages from your servers
flagged into the bulk folder.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very strange indeed!
I can think of only two explainations.
1, you are on 8.20, I'm on 8.15.hf2.
2, you ARE running Declude. maybe it's doing something to/with the
X-RCPT-TO.
Here's full headers of YOUR messageg. Note, I wrote the program that stuck
in the X-Envelope-From: through
The only way an MX record for mail.salemradiology.com will have any
effect is if mail is addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You
need, as someone said before the MX record at the domain level for
slaemradiology.com
Eric S
IMail Admin wrote:
Hi,
We have a strange problem, that's slightly
When using the NT user database option, users can only change their
passwords at the NT logon prompt. Imail has no user control with this
user db.
Eric S
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Unless I am running different settings for 8.15HF2, users can change
passwords from the 8383 Port through the
Microsoft has some trivial web-code samples that allow just that. If you
have a public IIS handy, and can't find the reference on Microsoft.com, I'll
dig it up for you. They'd still be using a different interface for password
maintenance, but at least it would be over the web, and not require a
Yes I am running 8.2. Looking back at archived emails, from before the
upgrade, I found that they do have the X-RCPT-TO line. Question for
Ipswitch: Was this header removed in 8.2? If so, why? Can it be put
back?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Probably because RFC 2821 dictates if the MUA cant find any MX
records for mail.example.org but an A record is found, it should be
treated as if it was associated with an implicit MX RR, with a
preference of 0.
For the lurkers: this behavior is not the same as walking up the
Hello All,
Just curious if anyone is having issues with having port 256
open. I was testing that I could send email using this port on the new version
of Imail, but noticed that I dont have to have it set that My Server
Requires Authentication. That tells me that anyone can send thru my
We don't use port 256. Our alternate port is the recommended 587, which
forces authentication.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Grant Griffith - IMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 1:28 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail 8.20 and port 256?
NO, it will still depend on Relay
Settings in the SMTP service.
Why are you using port 256?
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Grant Griffith - IMail
Sent: Tuesday, July
05, 2005 11:29 AM
To:
I am having issues sending out e-mails to domain names that have a hypen
as part of the email address. Such as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did install the hotfix for the issue that I ran across before which
was the hyphen in the user id. [EMAIL PROTECTED] now works with the assistance
of the
I was thinking port 256 was the
authentication port Imail built into Imail 8.2x. I thought wrong.
Does port 587 use the SMTP relay settings also? Or is it totally Auth
only.
Thanks,
Grant Griffith
EI8HTLEGS, A Division of ETC
(812)932-1000
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You enable port 587 using
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\SMTPD32\Parameters\
EnableExtraPort
0 = off
1 = on
You can change the port number usung
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\SMTPD32\Parameters\
ExtraPort
587 = default
You can force SMTP AUTH on
It is forced authentication.
- Original Message -
From: Grant Griffith - IMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 8.20 and port 256?
|I was thinking port 256 was the authentication port Imail built
It only forces authentication if you have it set to force authentication.
Force authentication is the default.
Kevin Bilbee
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom Pepper
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 11:47 AM
To:
John,
I guess my message wasn't clear. I did contact Yahoo, I tried to post to
the Declude list (OT) to glean some wisdom there to see if anyone had any
experience with this because Yahoo is hitting me with canned answers.
What Declude wasn't helping me with was the fact that I am not getting
John,
I guess my message wasn't clear. I did contact Yahoo, I tried to post to
the Declude list (OT) to glean some wisdom there to see if anyone had any
experience with this because Yahoo is hitting me with canned answers.
What Declude wasn't helping me with was the fact that I am not getting
I see my post in the mail archive, but I never got it.
Have you checked your mailserver to see if there were connection
attempts from 63.246.13.90 (the IP that the Declude.JunkMail list comes
from) on June 30 (the day that you posted to the list)? That list has
been very quiet for the past
Scott - this is all I am seeing, the outbound message, in all of my logs for
that day. What is troubling is they are telling me they are getting an
undeliverable when trying to e-mail me. I even checked my SMTP control
access list to see if somehow I blocked them by mistake.
Why would they be
Title: Trusted DNS Black Lists (immediate deletion)
Hello All,
Off-late we have been receiving a lot of SPAMs. At present, the spam settings are to tag the subject line and deliver to the user.
Can anyone suggest Trusted DNS Black Lists (immediate deletion) ?
Thanks and Regards,
Title: Trusted DNS Black Lists (immediate deletion)
We check verus several lists, plus check the Mail From, if it matches 2 or
more, it is deleted. Keep in mind, once it has matched two, it stops
checking.
SpamCop * bl.spamcop.netspamhaus *
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.orgDSBL * list.dsbl.orgsorbs *
Title: Trusted DNS Black Lists (immediate deletion)
spamcop and spamhaus
Kalpesh Kamdar wrote:
Hello All,
Off-late we have been receiving a lot
of SPAMs. At present, the spam settings are to tag the subject line and
deliver to the user.
Can anyone suggest "Trusted DNS
Title: Trusted DNS Black Lists (immediate deletion)
There
are no lists that can be trusted, unless you create your own DNS black list. All
lists make mistakes and list servers temporarily that should not be
listed.
Kevin
Bilbee
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Trusted DNS Black Lists (immediate deletion)
You know what he meant. We all know we live in an
imperfect world.
There are no lists that can be trusted, unless you create your own DNS
black list. All lists make mistakes and list servers temporarily that should
not be listed.
Title: Trusted DNS Black Lists (immediate deletion)
XBL, CBL and SPAMCOP seems to be very reliable by having
only a few false positive rate of around 0.3% (compared to the total number of
processed messages)
But all this lists are far from beeing perfect in catching
spam. In the last 24
Title: Trusted DNS Black Lists (immediate deletion)
Thanks for all the information.
So in IMAIL under "AntiSpam Connection Filtering" tab
:
is there a way to forward all the spam tagged emails to a
particular email address ( for eg : sys admin email id, and then the sys admin
can
Title: Trusted DNS Black Lists (immediate deletion)
Well
no I do not know what he ment and I do not know his expertise level so I am
going to give the most consertive advise. Mabe he thinks it is OK do delete on a
single test. If we do that here our customers have the potential to loose
Title: Trusted DNS Black Lists (immediate deletion)
Look
at using rules to forward messages tagged with imails spam header and have them
forwarded to another mailbox.
Kevin
Bilbee
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kalpesh
38 matches
Mail list logo
