Hallo,
as my SMTP Service crashes from time to time and let some T*/D*-Files
sitting in spool, I am looking for a commandline tool to batch rename
all T-Files to Q-Files after the restart of the server.
Can Anybody suggest a commandline tool for rename all T(\w*).smd to
Q\1.smd ?
ROTFLOL
Ronald E. Kushner wrote:
Nawed Ali Khan wrote on 1/4/1980:
Any Update..?
Ronald Regan was elected President. We hope the scumbag Iranians free
the hostages soon. Let's promise all of America that they never get
nuclear weapons at any cost. Damn I'm sick of 89 cent a gallon
LOL
Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald E.
Hi,
I installed IMail 8.22 on plain and naked test pc. The LDAP service will not
start, it terminates with error 19. I followed all articles from the KB, no
success.
This installation has only one host, at the moment no user was added.
Any idea?
btw: Uses IMail 2006 an updated version of
Don't do that, it will hurt.
Only IMail should be changing the names of the files. How are you
going to know which ones are truly complete message sets and
which ones were interrupted by the outage (Answer, all of them!)?
Those complete ones are the ones IMail changes the name of, the
others,
I just got off the phone with the abuse department at Comcast. I was told
that we were being blacklisted because of our HELO did not match or
something. He said that it was not configurable in Imail even in the latest
version, and it was going to be used more aggressively with other ISP's. Any
On Tuesday, January 31, 2006 at 4:00:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
I just got off the phone with the abuse department at Comcast. I was told
that we were being blacklisted because of our HELO did not match or
something. He said that it was not configurable in Imail even in the
Is Ipswitch going to address this anytime soon? Kevin?
-
Travis Rabe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duane Hill
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 8:21 AM
To: Website World
Subject: Re: [IMail
Is this me or IPSwitch?
Received: from list.ipswitch.com (list.ipswitch.com [156.21.1.21])
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 156.21.1.21 with
no reverse DNS entry.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
Yes, this is obviously a BIG problem since we're
talking about on of the largest broadband providers in the US.
Travis Rabe wrote:
Is Ipswitch going to address this anytime soon? Kevin?
-
Travis Rabe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I guess they're doing this on a domain by domain basis? Because I've seen
successful e-mails delivered to comcast.net as late as this morning.
Cavell McDermott
Network Administrator
Cottonwood Financial
972.753.0822 Office
214.403.4918 Cell
http://www.thecashstore.com
-Original
I seem to remember from the Declude forum, this
problemis associated with Declude 3.x
Try backing up to Declude 2.x
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of randy
armbrechtSent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 5:23 PMTo:
We haven't had any Comcast complaints from customers, YET. Hope it doesn't
get to that.
Matt Warren
IT Technician
A+ N+ MCP MCSA
414-847-1207
Ken Cook Co.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mail-lists
Sent: Tuesday, January
Don't do that, it will hurt.
Hmm,
but they are complete Mails and renaiming it manually works well. Are
you 100% shure that the Sending system didn't get a 250 OK and that it
will resend the mails?
which ones were interrupted by the outage (Answer, all of them!)?
Strange. Sometimes I get
Received: from list.ipswitch.com (list.ipswitch.com [156.21.1.21])
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 156.21.1.21 with
no reverse DNS entry.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get the same...
Received: from list.ipswitch.com (unknown [156.21.1.21])
Probably a temporary slowness
Is this me or IPSwitch?
Received: from list.ipswitch.com (list.ipswitch.com [156.21.1.21])
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA 156.21.1.21 with
no reverse DNS entry.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get the same...
Received: from list.ipswitch.com (unknown [156.21.1.21])
Len Conrad wrote:
Received: from list.ipswitch.com (list.ipswitch.com [156.21.1.21])
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS: This E-mail was sent from a MUA/MTA
156.21.1.21 with
no reverse DNS entry.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get the same...
Received: from list.ipswitch.com (unknown [156.21.1.21])
Probably a
For those of you who have used Mhonarc, how well does it handle messages
with attachments?
Thanks,
John C
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
Is there a way to reconfigure Imail 8.22 Pro to use the
From entry
instead?
What, like you can't spoof that as well?
I was just curious as I've gotten reports from users who say they've had
problems with people who don't enter a reply to entry in their email
client and they've been
It's on their FTP site for those of you who can't wait.
ftp://ftp.ipswitch.com/Ipswitch/Product_Support/IMail/imail200602a.exe
I've got it installed and running with no activation hassles.
Upgraded my 2006.00 previously installed on my demo server.
Never installed 2006.01
Still running 8.22 on
If I installed 2006.02 do I need to install 2006.02a?
-
Travis Rabe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Traylor
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:01 AM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
No they blacklist the entire mail server's IP address and then nobody can
send email to a Comcast address. The tech said they had numerous people with
Imail servers that had the same problem, but Imail will not let you do
anything to counter the problem.
I think the mail people affected are
Please read my posts - It was not Declude;
Update...
Since 4am monday, I have not had any issues - still
monitoring
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
FuhrmeisterSent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 11:38 AMTo:
If you installed .02 with no problems then you don't need .02a.
Tripp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 1:33 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 2006.02a
OK - I gave a detailed review on my initial
post
This IS NOT Declude.
Please read my initial post.
Randy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis
RabeSent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 1:43 PMTo:
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE:
Hi Travis,
The only difference is that we addressed an issue (that existed in 2006.02)
where contacts may be overwritten but if this did not occur when you
upgraded to .02, then you should be okay. here is the excerpt from the
release notes on the a in 2006.02a.
o Fixed an install problem where
I will stand by Declude and state that it is not DescludeI had issues
with QueueMgr running Imail 8.15 and Declude 2.x. Back in June 2005, I had
a major issue qith QM and so I decided to upgrade to 8.22 and Declude 3.x;
didn't resolve it so I moved back to 8.15 and 2.x;
Later I upgraded to
You can do it with a DOS rename command; but my experience is that the T
files are incomplete transferred files caused by a TCP/IP break, etc
Randy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matti Haack
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 7:07 AM
And more than one person has stated that
Declude 3.x has problems. Try to avoid working with a multivariable
problem if you can. Remove one at a time. Post back with your
results.
-
Travis Rabe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi
all,
yes,
we have this logged as TT4500 and will be prioritizing for addressing in the
next 1-2 months.
thanks
for all the feedback.
bye
for now,
kg
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Matrosity
HostingSent: Tuesday,
And that makes Imail worthless to many if they cant send email to one of
the largest broadband providers in the country.
I consider this a critical error that must be fixed asap.
H.
Website World wrote:
No they blacklist the entire mail server's IP address and then nobody
can send email to a
I've been getting errors of hostname suspect when sending to Optimum
Online, Hotmail, and some other [smaller] domains. I wonder if this is
connected somehow. We're not blacklisted in any spam dbs at all, so I know
it's not that.
James A. Frasch
Director of
So now everyone starts discussing the Comcast problem? Check the archives
for the last two weeks for Comcast, particularly the messages from Dave
Doherty, who has had success in dealing with Comcast. My own experiences
have been mixed: Comcast fixed the problem then blacklisted us again, then
This might well be.
One solution might be to gateway all outbound mail through a separate
(non-IMail) box.
-Dave Doherty
- Original Message -
From: James Frasch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 2:48 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
I think you will see less people caring about false
positives in terms of improperly configured mail servers. I hate
AOL but I love the fact they won't accept email from people without
PTR's. I wish more ISP's would take on this policy.
IMail Admin wrote:
So
now everyone starts discussing
Matrosity Hosting wrote:
I think you will see less people caring about false positives in terms
of improperly configured mail servers. I hate AOL but I love the fact
they won't accept email from people without PTR's. I wish more ISP's
would take on this policy.
I wouldn't get any mail from
With all due respect, I put this problem at the feet of Comcast, not
Other ISP's are supposedly going to start doing this soon as well. So your
problem grows to a much larger scale.
Mike
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
I've been getting errors of hostname suspect when sending to Optimum
Online
At the envelope stage, there are really on 4 fields that an MX knows about
1. IP of the SMTP client has a single PTR domain name which MUST
have, as best practice, a matching A record.
2. SMTP client's HELO domain
I think you will see less people caring about false positives in
terms of improperly configured mail servers. I hate AOL but I love
the fact they won't accept email from people without PTR's.
Has that changed? it used to be if AOL got abuse from an IP without
PTR, AOL would blacklist the IP
AOL now refuses all email coming from a mail server
with no PTR.
Len Conrad wrote:
I think you will see less people caring about
false positives in terms of improperly configured mail servers. I hate
AOL but I love the fact they won't accept email from people without
PTR's.
Has
AOL now refuses all email coming from a mail server with no PTR.
If AOL (FINALLY!) does, why can't we all do it as industry de facto
standard practice?
(they're 5 years late)
Len
_
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : free
I would love to but you wouldn't believe the number of
major companies that don't have one. IBM, Marriot, Wachovia and on and
on.
Len Conrad wrote:
AOL now refuses all email coming from a mail
server with no PTR.
If AOL (FINALLY!) does, why can't we all do it as "industry de
Hi,
This is a feature request:
The Attachment filtering allows to strip or replace the attachment and the
sender will be informed by a mail. For some cases, this makes no sense to me.
I would like to have an X-header entry like we have in the anti spam filters.
This would allows us to decide,
Their completeness is not assured until IMail renames them and
then acknowledges the sender. A T file is, by definition,
incomplete. I even suspect that your playing with T files could
be contributing to problems. If you must do something other than
deletion, move them and their D files, out of
Is this really an "improperly configured mail
server"? When configured with multiple domain names on a single IP, IMail
reports each domain name in the SMTP handoff (e.g., "mail.mydomain.com"). This
actually makes sense to me, but I'm not an expert, so is it really a violation
of the RFCs?
You would still have a PTR though so you shouldn't be
classified as improperly configured if you have one. I think the
Comcast issue is really about the HELO response from an Imail server
not the PTR.
Imail Admin wrote:
Is this really an "improperly
configured mail server"? When
Matrosity Hosting wrote:
You would still have a PTR though so you shouldn't be classified as
improperly configured if you have one. I think the Comcast issue is
really about the HELO response from an Imail server not the PTR.
Imail Admin wrote:
Is this really an improperly configured mail
Is this really an improperly configured mail server? When
configured with multiple domain names on a single IP, IMail reports
each domain name in the SMTP handoff
handoff? It appears that Imail says :
HELO domain.tld
... based on the virtual server domain.tld that accepted the inbound
Maybe it's just me but ALL the IP's that use different HELO's are spam or
zombies.
Right. You and all the other admins who don't understand the RFCs, which is
the major problem here.
IMail and some other RFC-compliant servers greet the receiving server with a
HELO or EHLO string that
The pointer isn't going to match the HELO, or the MX for that matter,
unless you just get lucky. If you have multiple reverse pointers
(domain.com, domain1.com, domain2.com) configured for the same IP, it
is a DNS crap shoot which one will get returned or may be cached.
Tuesday, January 31,
Best practices would have the A record, the PTR record, and the mail server
HELO (EHLO) string return the exact same data.
IMail provides a dynamic domain with its HELO / EHLO strings, and that is
the problem.
-d
- Original Message -
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Dave Doherty wrote:
Maybe it's just me but ALL the IP's that use different HELO's are
spam or zombies.
Right. You and all the other admins who don't understand the RFCs,
which is the major problem here.
IMail and some other RFC-compliant servers greet the receiving server
with a HELO or
???
whats that???
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Checca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 5:20 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Migration
LOL
Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal
hello Nawed,
we're doing one final check to find a reseller with iplanet/solaris to mail
experience.
bye for now,
kg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nawed Ali Khan
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 12:17 AM
To:
Aside from the fact that it would seem you are condemning your own Imail
installation, there is a more practical problem here: there are a large
number of mail servers (Imail, possibly some others) that report different
domain names during the HELO for the same IP. It is simply not practical
56 matches
Mail list logo
