I have got an eval of IMail 8.1 right now (waiting for my real copy to
arrive) and I am trying to setup the WebMail portion. I have
it working from the inside of the network. From the inside I
can access it as http://10.0.0.8 but from the outside trying
http://205.150.108.8 I get
I have found this to be true as well. I created a .bat file
for Win 2000 and Windows told me defrag couldn't be executed
in dos mode.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg79866.html
~Rick
___
Virus Scanned and
...and the multiple OpenLDAP issues.. And the Imonitor not monitoring the
correct SMTP port (when changed to other than 25)...
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ImailForum
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL
I've not been able to duplicate this problem; did you restart
IMonitor and SMTPD after changing the port to 225? Was the
SMTPD start up messing in the syslog for SMTPD correct?
Yes I have even rebooted the server. W2KADV with new install of 8.1. I
changed it back to 25 and stop/restart
Well I couldn't get mine to work here.. I get a stack overflow and the
images don't display.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Panda Consulting S.A. Luis Alberto Arango
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL
version.
If there is something I can do to help you, let me know.
-Luis Arango
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Klinge
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 10:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] KillerWebMail
I have had a few customers complain that some mail is being
bounced back or not making it to them from certain domains.
Most of them are on my main domain tymewyse.com and some from
a virtual domain. Everyone I have received mentions RFC822.
My questions are:
1) Does RFC822 have to do
I have changed the default SMTP port form 25 to 225 and yet the IMonitor
service doesn't seem to change as well. I've rebooted the server and the
IMonitor still shows the service down although the SMTP service is actually
up/up.
Is there a registry hack I can do to help the IMonitor service
The Killer WebMail 4.02 templates will continue to function,
but you will not have access to the new features through Web
Messaging. Download notifications for the update to Killer
WebMail 4.03 are in the process of being sent out. 4.03 just
makes the functionality in 8.10 available to
via IIS? I think the old version has it in the readme.html
file with the
cwm stuff. The files that needed mod were
config_ImagesPathRegular.cgi and
config_ImagesPathSSL.cgi. I'm not even sure if our old CWM
templates and EZ
So should I edit these files?
I wouldn't see what
I am getting a different error than Travis did. My LDAP
service wont start. I cannot re-initialize the database
because the service refuses to start.
This is my event log error.
Event Type: Information
Event Source: OpenLDAP-slapd
Event ID: 1281
Description:
The description for
What does this X-Header Mean?
X-IMAIL-SPAM-PHRASE: (7176011000e68545, free)
Maybe on July 17th you'll receive 601 spam emails starting at 1000 AM every
685 minutes for 45 days ~ FREE!
Is the update safe to install yet?
~Rick
OMG.. You're kidding right?
Is this reproducible?
I'm just writing notes and for when I update this I can hopefully only spend
6 hours doing it rather than 48
Thanks,
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christopher Checca
Not that I have heard yet. I also noticed another thing
today. After about 5 Hours of running OpenLDAP with Web
Messaging - the web messageing almost came to a halt. I
stopped the LDAP service around noon and web messageing has
been somuch better since then.
...service-specific
I'm trying out Imail Server 8 and discovered that SMTP AUTH
with CRAM-MD5
doesn't work.
With PLAIN and LOGIN I don't have any probs. I'm using
external Database (SQL). Does anybody have a hint for me?
Are you using Eudora or something? Anything in the log files?
~Rick
I'm running Imail 8.05 and have my retry timer set to 30
(minutes) and retry attempts set to 96 (equating to 48 hours).
Our server seems to be bouncing after about 130 minutes
This has only started since I upgraded to Imail 8.05 from v6,
have also installed HF2.
Have no idea why
Has anyone heard of what some of the additional feature set
might be in the
next point release of iMail or as to when it will be released?
I'm curious too.. Isn't there a list of requested features somewhere other
than searching the archives?
~Rick
Well the math looks right if you want to bounce after 2
days. Did you
stop/restart the service after any changes?
~Rick
Yes I believe so . A retry of 30 minutes is default in Imail
anyway (so I wouldn't have changed that), and it was trying
96 times as that's what the bounce
I think now would be the time for IPSwitch to handle SPF too.. ;-)
~Rick
I must say that we will look forward to seing and using many of these
additional features.
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com
I have noticed that several of the Blacklist servers that Ipswitch
included with Imail are no longer operating. Does anyone have an
updated list of safe and usable Blacklist DNS Servers?
You can go to
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/support/ip4r.htm for the
official list of DNS-based
v8.1 seems to be coming along ok. I have some odd LDAP
notifications in the event log after the conversion, but it
is working fine. However, no matter what I so in Web Mail I
get the following error:
The server process has been interrupted due to an internal
error. Please wait a
That's not even a fair assumption nor warranted. I see no malice on Scotts
post. Our email servers block tons of comcast email and we don't use imgate
nor declude junkmail.
~Rick
Scott,
If you are not going to comment, why proceed to comment? You
are just trying to bait Len.
It's
I have a IIS 5.0 Virtual SMTP server that is only displaying
the server name in the HELO, not the FQDN. Network properties
are configured correctly. I even tried looking through
MetaEdit 2.0, and I can not fine it.
Does any one know how to set the HELO in IIS 5.0 Virtual SMTP server?
If an ip or block of ip's is entered in the denied access
acl, is that applied prior to smtp auth (so they cannot send
an smtp request even if they have a valid mail account)?
Thanks.
Chapter 6 Access Control Options:
http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/guide/imailug801/index.html
Did you:
On the Select Default Domain page, type the name of the default domain (Type
the FQDN for the default domain name) for your server in the Domain box, and
then click Finish?
And you are not sending mail from this IIS machien to the Imail box are ya?
Did you try sending mail from a
On the Select Default Domain page, type the name of the
default domain
(Type
the FQDN for the default domain name) for your server in the Domain
box,
and
then click Finish?
I was using the Default Virtual SMTP server. That is only
available when creating a new server.
And
Might also scan it for viruses.. perhaps there is a trojan running on that
port.. ?
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] syslogd problems
That sounds like the problem.. Whatsup software via ipswitch.. Probably has
the port in use..
Also.. Wasn't there a critical patch for that? Or was it there ftp stuff?
Hmm.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Randall Sargent
Rick Godwin of snowboard.com:
I visited your website and I see that you allow anyone to
sign up for free and get an instant email account on your
server. You've opened Pandora's box and this is the result.
Blaming IMail for this little disaster isn't quite fair.
I still support
Could also be viruses..
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~Rick
Righto - thanks for you help Scott
I've recently moved my IMail Server 7.15 over from an NT 4 box (in
C:\Imail) to a Win2k3 box (in E:\Imail), I have applied all the
necessary
Reposting original question to the masses:
Is the Web based Email subject to (HTML+TIME Script Injection) exploit like
hotmail and yahoo web based email? Is there a quick rule I can add to
reject or reformat all html based email's?
Thanks,
~Rick
Reposting original question to the masses:
Is the Web based Email subject to (HTML+TIME Script
Injection) exploit
like hotmail and yahoo web based email? Is there a quick rule I can
add to reject or reformat all html based email's?
You'll need to provide more details (such as a
Thank you. Yes we have not installed any on-access scanner
except McAfee and it is disabled. We even excluded the local
drives to make sure it stays out of the picture. We scan with
ClamAV, F-Protect, and AVG and each of those do not even have
an on-access scanner on. Alert managers and
Has anyone used the UASP template, it seems to be good for
what I can see on the demo. Although, I do not see Calendar
and Spellcheck enable to test them, has anybody used it and
could give me some kind of feedback before I go ahead and buy
the product? Thanks,
I'm having a hard time
Is the Web based Email (HTML+TIME Script Injection) subject to this exploit
too like hotmail and yahoo? Is there a quick rule I can add to reject or
reformat all html based email's?
Thanks,
~Rick
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by
This might work:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/KW-20020930-DM05.htm
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of waheed malek
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] a problem with attachment
I want to thank you all for your help, especially
Scott from
declude. I will be unsubscribing from this list so you
do not get
the bounce messages when the mailbox fills up. My earlier
prediction
has come true.. I am no longer working for this company.
Dismissed
Rick,
I would start here to see if you can get a hold of some at their NOC.
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/whois.ch?ip=62.167.2.12
Rick B.
Thanks Rick I did use that data.. Guess it must be an un-manned spam
station..
~Rick
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Klinge
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 2:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Spam offenders
Does anyone have a good list of current spammers via ip? I
mean the most aggressive abusers.
I have this one: 62.167.2.12, I
Sorry my list isn't by IP but attached is a list of hosts and
the number of messages sent over that last 30 days that our
spam filter considered spam. I only included hosts that sent
90 or more messages.
Thanks Gary I'll try and run these through to get the ip's.. Sure appreciate
it.
What can I do with this list to help eliminate messages from spammers?
GP
At 03:38 AM 3/20/2004, you wrote:
The worst offenders.
http://www.clickdoug.com/blacklist.htm
ACL the entire netblock at your border routers..
~Rick
For those late to the thread, note that these are NOT my specific
recommendations (mine can be found in the default Declude
JunkMail config
files), but are just the names of the spam tests that
someone else was
suggesting here.
For those of us unable to afford your software in our
Does anyone have a good list of current spammers via ip? I mean the most
aggressive abusers.
I have this one: 62.167.2.12, I guess from SWITZERLAND. Started about 2
days ago and my spam volume doubled. Did a major spammer co-lo to
switerzland, and more importantly is there anyone here on the
This might work:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/KW-20020930-DM05.htm
~Rick
Nope ... I don't have that problem. Sorry.
Hello... Last week I posted the question below and got no
replies :( Am I the only one having such a problem or did I
post the question poorly??
Hello - I'm
Ok I'm seeing this snip in my viri log file:
03/17/2004 07:21:34 Q50d10113025a256d Error 1 in virus scanner 1.
Imail 8.5.2 - Declude v1.78i9 - fprot for dos - w2k
I've searched the archives for this error and couldn't find
anything.
I'm thinking maybe it has to do with security on
Is there a way in IMail...that if an email is sent to a
account that DOES NOT exist that it can still be delivered to
a 'master' account?
for example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an account that doesn't exist.
what I would like to do is have that non-existent account's
email delivered to
I don't know about everyone else, but I find that the spool
directory gets
really heavily fragmented. So much so that it takes five
minutes to open a
10MB log file. In it's default install location (right along
with all the
customers' boxes), it fragments everything else, leading to
Road Runner (RR) does have limits on size. Residential and
business class
are to different. I believe Residential RR 10 Meg.
Business Class Varies
based on service and connection.
Does anyone know if rr.com has an attachment restriction on
outgoing mail?
We do too.. And
Ok I'm seeing this snip in my viri log file:
03/17/2004 07:21:34 Q50d10113025a256d Could not find report file
C:\IMail\spool\D50d10113025a256d.vir\report.txt.
03/17/2004 07:21:34 Q50d10113025a256d Error 1 in virus scanner 1.
03/17/2004 07:21:34 Q50d10113025a256d Scanned: Error in virus scanner.
I've got the usual 20K in size archives coming through the
email pretty much as of this morning, only now they're in RAR
files and don't seem to be getting snagged by Declude/McAfee.
I've tried to open the file from the message at a standalone
workstation but get a system cannot find
I am running Imail 6.0x and recently have had a few clients
try sending ridiculously large outbound messages (400+ MB) of
course these messages get stuck in the spool and we have to
manually go in and delete them and also it ties up disk
space. I want to know if setting the Single
http://www.famhost.com/support/files.zip
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland
Sickenberger
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Spam subject filter
Hi,
I don't suppose anybody out
The only way that comes to mind, that I can think of, is that if you are
aggregating both lines into one common for the Imail server by hardware.
Then there's the ip address and rDNS records that need to 'mirror' each
other. Some isp's will not allow other isp's share the same ip block so it
Troy,
Multihomed end points usually run BGP (Border Gateway
Protocol). BGP allows you to advertise multiple paths to your
network. Your mail server always has the same IP address, but
BGP tells everyone that there are multiple paths to it and
which ones are currently active. BGP can
Send it to me.. [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. I'm curious with all the confusion going
around
Thanks,
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Welch, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
...and here some too
http://www.famhost.com/support/files.zip
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christopher Checca
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 2:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Sample rules.ima file
Here's a similar one:
http://www.k-otik.com/exploits/02.27.THCimail.c.php
Probably covered by the same patch.
William Lefkovics
I wonder if this same type of exploit could be used on there other
services?
~Rick
Per my email, I orginally set both the config file and
the IMal admin attachment size to 0 , which is supposed to
allow unlimited attachments. It was interpreted by the server
as literally zero and nothing would attach. Next, I went to
the knowledge base and found the max size
I have a customer who is having massive issues since we moved
to Killer Webmail. We were running IMail 8.02 at the time of
the upgrade - I have since patched to 8.05 and will be
applying HF 1 2 over the weekend. I have searched the
knowledge base thoroughly and applied the few solutions
Also.. Could you post any log snips that show the errors with the
10054?
Not much to show but 3477 of the following
20040226 085103 Socket Error - 12.33.164.7 Error while
writing sockect due to error 10054 or malicious connection
type. 20040226 085103 Socket Error - 12.33.164.7
I've seen a few of you talking about this issue with
SMTP/SMTPD stopping...I half wonder...any chance that you
have that new virus, W32/Netsky.B and W32/Netsky.C. I've
also seen mention of another Worm/Virus that also uses it's
on SMTP service: W32/Israz-B. Here's are links with info
I do...no problems as of yet
-- Original Message --
From: Andy Tripp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:07:34 -0800
For those of you who are running ASSP for SPAM, do you run
it on the same
box as Imail??
Not sure what this is. Any ideas?
HERE ARE THE HEADERS:
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by mail.prudentialrand.com
(SMTP32) id A0608; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:27:50 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:27:50 -0500
Status: U
X-UIDL: 366853753
HERE IS THE MESSAGE:
I am still having a problem with my Imail server on W2k
(sp4.0) Imail 7.13 - 2002.12.16.17 running KillerWebMail
About three times a day webmessenger and smtp lock up for a
few minutes then they respond.
I noticed a funky error in the web logs. I saw a similar post
last month with no
Does anyone know of a SQL to Exchange connector to transfer
data real time.
http://www.quantumsoftware.com.au/ProductsServices/ExchangeConnector/Default
.aspx
~Rick
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com
([64.66.97.6] helo=MGMT) by
ict-famhost.email.system
; 24 Feb 04 22:29:46 -
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Rick Klinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:29:26 -0600
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset
Great suggestion...
However, the imail server is not on a NAT'd network.
David Dresler
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Tripp
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail
Our's don't except that either.. Never has since ver 6.xx
Unknown user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, it should be [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Are domain literals really 'that' important?
Tia,
~Rick
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered
If you Bind the external public IP to the NIC on the IMail
server then it
will accept the domain literal
I have one Imail server that accepts domain literals and
one that doesn't.
The one that does uses its real IP.
The one that doesn't uses NAT, so it has an internal IP address.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Tripp
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 6:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] help with domain literals
Won't the firewall freak out if I have the same IP on the
inside as
Won't the firewall freak out if I have the same IP on the
inside as it
has on the outside? It might think I'm spoofing it?
No -- it won't see any packets. If IMail needs to send any
packets, they
won't go outside the server, so the firewall won't see them.
I don't know about
Greetings Rick,
I don't think that domain literals are not very important.
However, some ISP's, one in particular that comes to
mind...AOL, will send to the domain literals. In AOL's case,
if you request your IP to be tested on their blacklist, they
send the results to postmaster
I run my own mailserver here on a single static IP from
Sprint/Earthlink.
However: RoadRunner fails in rDNS to get my domain (which is
pointed correctly to my IP)
Sprint/Earthlink won't add my domain to their DNS for my IP.
Any way to get my email to appear to come from
[EMAIL
Um.. Maybe they are down?
Trace to: 207.136.192.174
#IP address Host nameRound trip
time
1192.168.0.1 Unavailable 3 ms
264.39.223.1 64-39-223-1.pixius.com 72 ms
3 No response
@ms5.hinet.net is probably in your kill.lst somewhere..
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Bullion
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 10:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] One email address not able to send us
Sometimes if you use notepad to edit the kill.lst file you can select the
edit menu then find.
HTH,
~Rick
Man I looked through my kill.lst 30 times, and didn't see it.
Now suddenly I see it. :) Thanks guys.
___
Virus
For version 8.05 I think just the time (timer) has a limit (10 minimum/120
maximum - between number of retries). The actual number of retries, I don't
believe, have a limit.
~Rick
Hmm, am I wrong here or should Ipswitch not put a maximum
time for retries?
We have several cities that we
Hi, we have iMail version 8.05. Our settings for iMail SMTP
Retry are as
follows:
Number of retries before returning to sender: 240
Amount of time (in minutes) between retries: 60
This will put your total days to
240 * 60 = 14400
14400 / 60 = 240
240 hours / 24 hours per day
Sorry to post to my own post but after re reading yours I would try this:
For a wait before bounce of 1 day (24 hours) I would set the timer to try
Every 30 mins for an attempt period of 240.
48 * 30 = 1440 min
1440 / 60 = 24 hours
24 hours / 24 hours a day = 1 day
Unless the timer functionaliy
This works pretty good too just change example.com to your site:
div align=centercenter
table border=2 width=640 bgcolor=#CC cellpadding=2
cellspacing=5 bordercolordark=#00 bordercolorlight=#CC9966
tr
td width=145 align=center bgcolor=#FFp style=MARGIN: 0px;
LINE-HEIGHT: 100%
Could they be refusing your mail because your dns is setup wrong?
DNS error: 69.59.142.7 is dexter.advantex.net but dexter.advantex.net is
69.59.142.4 instead of 69.59.142.7
Just a thought,
~Rick
RoadRunner, in our experience, is totally ignorant about what
they are doing. When dealing
Elwin,
Maybe this IPSwitch knowledgebase article will help.
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-2118-DM01.htm
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: Elwin Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Elwin Ellis
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 8:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Web
Try installing the bug fix from IPSwitch.. Won't hurt and heck it just might
work:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/KW-20020930-DM05.htm
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Barbara ONeal
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 10:18 PM
Neil,
Right, wrong, or indifferent here is what I use. I have purposely prefixed
spaces before any executables (executable. com) in order to hopefully
bypass any spam or virus filters. Please give this thoughtful consideration
if you make these files and omit the space. All comments and/or
A reply to my previous post. Looks like the formating got messed up so
here's a zip file instead. Got to love it..
~Rick
Neil,
Right, wrong, or indifferent here is what I use. I have
purposely prefixed spaces before any executables
(executable. com) in order to hopefully bypass
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-2616-DM01.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Cerveny
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 4:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Email Deletion
You could schedule the
: Rick Klinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:31 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Web Mail Broken
I am still having problems even after a reinstall of the
Imail application from v8.0 up to 8.5 hf1. Maybe I do have
to start from version 6.06? Apply all
I am still having problems even after a reinstall of the Imail application
from v8.0 up to 8.5 hf1. Maybe I do have to start from version 6.06? Apply
all the patches up to and including the 8.05 hf2?
The web interface will not send mail. Everything else appears to be
functioning fine. I've
Maybe use the built in windows task scheduler?
~Rick
My Apologies for the Off Topic Post, but I know someone here
will have the answer!
How do I setup F-Prot Updater to run as a service so it can
get updates even though the computer (a server) doesn't have
an user logged on?
Ok.. Having problems with sending web mail.
What is the current version of the IMAIL1.EXE? Can I extract it from the
disk or do I have to use the latest hot fix/patch? I'm thinking maybe it is
corrupt. The version I have is: 3.12.10.3 and it's 192kb. Maybe when I
installed the latest HF2 it
For web mail are there suppose to be any entries in this key?
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IPSwitch\IMail\Web
Ours is blank perhaps that's why it won't send mail?
Imail 8.05
Thanks,
~Rick
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by
Well I am at a loss. The IMAIL1.EXE works via the command line. We do
receive email fine so am I right in assuming the SMTPD32.EXE is working?
Anyone else have an idea why our domains can't send mail out via web
interface? It times out and nothing sends..
Tia,
~Rick
-Original
Yes Gregg you are correct.. I've checked this many times.. :-)
~Rick
We've seen this condition and found the cause in earlier
vesion of IMail. Hopefully it applies and will resolve your issue:
Using the Imail Administrator, click on the 'localhost' item
on the left of the screen. Now
The server is able to browse the internet and pull up the web interface so I
think DNS is ok. I've ensured the intel and 3com drivers are current and
I'm not seeing any issues in the server logs.. Possibly could be a IP Stack
issues.. But how to check?
Thanks,
~Rick
Does it malfunction
I've search as I might. Anyone have any ideas why none of our sites can
send mail via the web interface?
Thanks,
~Rick
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.
To Unsubscribe:
won't send mail
How do you mean? Getting errors? Bounces? Clicking send
does nothing?
Travis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Klinge
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail
a connection to a known SMTP
server to port 25. Try mail.earthlink.net you should get a
response. If you do then it is not a firewall issue.
What are you using for a firewall?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Rick Klinge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 7
Whiteman
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 7:22 PM
To: Rick Klinge
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Web Messaging won't send mail
What actually is suppose to happen with the web mail
once one
presses send?
The web messaging daemon runs the IMAIL1.EXE MIME
assembler
No info as of yet. Is it spreading via attachments? If so what extention?
~Rick
FYI, a new virus Tanx was discovered a few hours ago.
Within about 10
minutes, we've already received copies from 3 different
countries. More
details can be found at
Ah.. Shouldn't really be too bad.. don't most email admins block .exe
extentions anyway?
Thanks
~Rick
Thanks for the heads up. I'm sure we will all get our virus
checkers updated asap. As for me, Grisoft hasn't come out
with an update yet so I'm hoping ASSP blocks it as it apears
to
101 - 200 of 371 matches
Mail list logo
