How so Len? Blank spaces before or after the atachment name?
~Rick
Ah.. Shouldn't really be too bad.. don't most email admins
block .exe
extentions anyway?
blocking executable extensions, preferably at a front-end MX
gateway, will
stop a large majority of the infections, and was
We are still getting tons of mydoom and now this stuff. I just can't
imagine any email server actually accepting executible attachments, really,
it boggles my mind. :)
~Rick
Ah.. Shouldn't really be too bad.. don't most email admins
block .exe
extentions anyway?
I *hope* you didn't
That's right.. I stand corrected again. That's what I get for not having
enough coffee.
Thanks,
~Rick
How so Len? Blank spaces before or after the atachment name?
novarg/mydoom had the Content- information on two lines, with
the second
line starting with a few spaces and then name=
Or better yet maybe a little more incentives for the users like this on
sans.org's site: http://isc.sans.org/antivirus.pdf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Laura Bhandari
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL
I'd probably add a filter to block *.com files too.. No?
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Checca
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] blocked exts ... please comment.
Are you using the built in SMTP MTA? If you need a free spam filter, and it
works, try ASSP from http://sourceforge.net/projects/assp/.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mr
Gregory DeClue
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 3:46
The RFC's
http://www.ietf.org/rfc.html
Something like 821 I think.
~Rick
What determines what this is? Is it DNS? Is it at the
client? I notice some clients have a FQDN for HELO/EHLO and
others do not.
Thanks,
___
I don't know.. But ours does the same.. Missing and sometimes chars
before that.
~Rick
I just opened a case with Ipswitch about this problem, but I
thought I'd share with the group in case anyone had seen this
problem before.
I had a user complain about getting a not local user, not a
Our email server is having simular issues. A local(lan) computer/mua tries
to send and email to our local (lan) Imail server and the Imail server won't
send it out.. Comes back with the same:
20040212 155955 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (008E027C) [127.0.0.1] connect
127.0.0.1 port 2784
20040212 155955
Joe,
You are correct - there are many that do try to follow the RFC's, some that
add to it (AOL rDNS) comes to mind, SPF OMG type stuff, some whom believe
that the world can spin without them, and some that really are clueless what
it's for. Some of the RFC's are tough to digest and understand
Well this maybe not what you are wanting to hear but ever thought about the
auto update feature for windows? I think you can it to auto download and
install.
For the scripting part it would be dependant upon each of your networking
topologies, ie: Server OS, AD, SOHO, Workgroup, etc. If your
Rudy.. It's probably THE most critical patch that was ever released.. If
you are just 'now' getting this then it's time make some coffee, patch your
computers/servers.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rudy Pieruccini
Sent:
Sharyn,
I've posted this to a different list fwiw,
I've applied it to several critical W2K servers, after testing it of course,
and on serveral XP machiens and have seen no issues. Because of the Most
Critical nature of this patch I had choosen not to delay. IMHO, out of all
the patches
I think there are some concerns with the Gigabit NIC's. You might search
the List Archive.. Bottom of this email for further info.
~Rick
We're still at 7.13 and considering finally making the jump
to 8.whatever. Does anyone know how 8 handles the infamous
blame the NIC issues of
Well the RFC's are Request for Comments (Guidelines) not laws nor rules.
Most servers try to adhere to these guidelines to ensure the successful
delivery/return of email. If you refuse NUL senders you'll get listed in an
ignorant database called something like ignorant.org (which FWIW any email
I think there is known hacker scanning software that uses this port for vpn
dectection/finger printing:
http://www.nta-monitor.com/ike-scan/
FWIW,
~Rick
We have a client that deals with a state agency that is
demanding access to their server on port 500 (source and
destination, UDP
If you've enabled the IMonitor service and have port 8181 open in your
firewall you should be able to view your logs by signing into your email,
via a web browser, with and email administrators account. Ie:
example.com:8181
Also there are some other free log viewing tools at declude.com
Hth,
You can always save a copy of your sent email in your sent folder by
clicking the 'Yes' radio button in your user preference setup in KWM. IE:
Save copy of outgoing mail in Sent folder: No Yes
~Rick
Don't now if there exists a standard, an rfc or anything else
dealing with drafts. I
Travis.. I'm not having any issues with Imonitor I thought that socket
exhaustion was fixed a few release ago.
~Rick
If you are an administrator in Imail you can view the logs in
regular Web Messaging as well. There is no need to use the
iMonitor service as it causes too many
Jeff.. Here is a free one that works really well with w2k server:
http://www.famhost.com/support/pktfilter.zip
Hth,
~Rick
Would not suggest using a software based firewall that is
installed on the server. An external appliance is best. If
you have a small budget a WatchGuard Firebox
Some list users on other list of course.. Will use the shielding of
offensive language at rot13.com
Such as: Sbe ynathntr gung zvtug or bssrafr gb bguref
~Rick
And inappropriate language, whether or not it's
included within quotation marks, is always inappropriate -
lets watch the language
Not to jump in on this thread here.. but ASSP auto whitelist people that we
have emailed, such as this list. Doing so will allow mail to come through.
Here is the headers of 'this message' and as you can see the
X-Assp-Spam-Prob: 0.0 shows that it wasn't even considered for testing.
If the
I don't think so.. I believe it's limited to the size of the mailbox.
~Rick
Does Imail 7.15 have a default maximum attachment size that
it will accept?
If so is there any way to increase the maximum size?
Thanks.
___
I think there server is down.. Or non existent:
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/lookup.ch?name=www.virtualalert.comtype=MX
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hodgen He
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 11:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe Lookout removed it from the mail server thus it's no longer there to
be viewed?
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Heath
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] strange filter
His email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], he goes by x.
Mariella Cardinale
Summit Brokerage Services, Inc.
Ph: 561/338-2883
Fax: 561/347-6705
-- Original Message --
From: Rick Klinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I think this is typical.. They probably listed you, I believe, because your
upstream provider cerf.net supports spammers; Which would probably qualify
all of us to be listed.
http://www.five-ten-sg.com/blackhole.php?ip=63.241.6.152Search=Search
~Rick
My org is blocked there to, I don't worry
Have the teacher, via there union, consult with a lawyer and reference the
Michigan Computer Law
http://sun.science.wayne.edu/~dps/complaw.html
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bridges, Samantha
Sent: Monday, February 02,
That won't help much.. If he's running an SMTP email server at home.. Port
25 is blocked at the isp level.. Would be best just to get a business class
ip connection at home and ask them politely to un-block it.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Is it normal for the Queuemgr. - exe to stuck-up 50% or more of the
processors? I'm thinking that is kind of high for an application.. Suppose
it still needs refinement? Anyone know of a good way to cycle this puppy
every 30 minutes to an hour?
TIA,
~Rick
Yes.. That's what I did.. Chucked it into the task manager.. Thanks John
~Rick
Batch file?
Net stop Queue Manager
Net start Queue Manager
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.
To
Like the descriptive at declude states:
Warning: May contain a number of IPs that no longer are associated with
spammers, and are now allocated to legitimate customers that can not be
removed. May also blacklist entire ISPs.
~Rick
I personally don't know of any other email admins that use this
Kind of vague Mark.. What kind of Page Faults?.. What kind of server
hardware / os?
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Stich
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail Server 8.05 HF1
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Klinge
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 9:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail Server 8.05 HF1 - Page Faults
Kind of vague Mark.. What kind of Page Faults?.. What kind of server
hardware / os?
~Rick
-Original
http://www.lorriman.com/software/nttweaks/nttweaks.htm
Might help you too,
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Klinge
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 10:05 AM - FamHost
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail
Not sure if this will help you or not.. But we had the same problem when we
started with imail too. What we did was purchase the KWM templates and
moved them under IIS, as suggested in the readme, to help them render/load
faster. We also put in a standard 3Com 'desktop' nic card.. 3c905tx I
I don't think there is.. They use something called a gray list.. Shared
between all the nodes. Would be nice if there was a way to implement an
DNSRBL.. I have a perl script but don't know how to inject/sew it into the
process or code.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe a LookOut error:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=813514
~Rick
Has anyone seen or heard whether AOL is changing their policy
on AOL clients sending/recieving pop3/smtp mail from 3rd
party mail servers while connected to their network? I have
several field employees, when dialed
IMHO both.. Because we were having noticeable connectivity problems even
with T1 users. A 3COM 3C905 might be the ticket for you.. But the KWM
really is sweet and gives our clients a cleaner web based interface.
Hth,
~Rick
Did you drop down from using a fiber card to a 10/100 and
that
I use 5 and if it hits on 3 then drop carrier.. I have to agree in the
philosophy though (except the part about 5xx'n the sender) and even yours
John.. But why even except the trash in the first place. I wish there was a
rDNS/BL established somewhere on the planet that would allow web browsers
It is worth mentioning though, and I know this is the wrong list but.. Once
I enabled it in front of Imail, a day before the doom, no spam or viruses
have entered our clients email boxes. The load on our email server went
down considerably. Out of approximately 7000 emails only 3 were suspect
IP Ports
12.4.230.134 FTP SMTP HTTP POP3
But.. Try Steve's place at http://www.grc.com shields up ..
~Rick
Could someone try to scan 12.4.230.134 and let me know if
they see any other services open other than
Well.. I don't have a way to accurately monitor the actual load of just ASSP
but if I use the overall cpu load minus the base line I'm seeing it load the
processor at about 25-30% (only during email processing). I can't confirm
the memory usage either but I've heard it sucks up about 10k per
That's not nice...
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Administrator
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] [MailServer Notification]To Sender
virus found and action taken.
I don't think it's possible? If so plese do share!
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mathias Riegger
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 2:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Auto Responder
Hi out there,
I
The knowledge base will be your best apprentice
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20011127-DM02.htm
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Heath
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 8:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail
3com 980 works good
~Rick
I would defenitely go the server card route. I am just
trying to figure out
which one.
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.
To Unsubscribe:
I believe it works for version's 5+
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19991208-DM01.htm
~Rick
Will this rule work on 7.5 if I just add the lines to the
exsisting rule
file?
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by
Dude.. it's spam.. either way you look at it.. Save Money... 10% off...
Contact us today.. etc etc..
:-/
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 6:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Possible
Could it be that someone is running ASSP in learning mode and has a
subject tag inserted [Possible Spam]?.. If so they should delete that until
they take it out of learning mode..
Fwiw,
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffery
IMHO would copy them to all the domains.
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-2523-DM02.htm
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Zeki Kubilay Akyol
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 10:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail
Phone: 865-379-7171
Fax: 865-379-7173
MSN Instant Message [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not email IM Only)
- Original Message -
From: Rick Klinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 12:15 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Maybe Offtopic : Inbound Rules
IMHO
http://apps.declude.com/tools/virstats.ch?ip=192.168.1.0%2F24time=24type=I
P
Maybe the spammers got bugs too? That could be very very bad.. Imagine the
volume.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday,
B~(UEsDBAoAA):NUL
Would that be one of them?
~Rick
100% perfection, no, but an MX rule for blocking
whatever
attachments can be very effective.
Please post an IMail rule that has a substantive positive
effect with no FPs! (An FP is not a legitimate message
snip
B~(name=.*\.bat\s|name=.*\.exe\s|name=.*\.pif\s):NUL
B~(name=.*\.scr\s|name=.*\.shs\s|name=.*\.vbs\s):NUL
/snip
Nope.. Looks good to me.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of KathyJ
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 3:16 PM
To:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20010822-DM01.htm
Might help,
~Rick
I tried this rule, and then stopped and started services and
send myself a file called autoexec.bat from my hotmail
address and it still came through.
Well ... If you are not running Declude and just Imail native.. Then, IMHO,
I would implement ASSP to control the banning of extensions. Bottom line
It works and it's free:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/assp/
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Great to know that Declude and F-Prot for dos still works.. But what is
this:
The Anti Virus software on JaRay.net has reported that you were sent
an E-mail from [Forged], containing the W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus in the
refcode29384.txt.com attachment. The subject of the E-mail was Your IP
I see... Nice feature.. Would it be wise then to add a line in the virus.cfg
file to skip notifying the sender? Something like SKIPIFVIRUSNAMEIS SOBER.*
~Rick
Great to know that Declude and F-Prot for dos still works..
But what is
this:
The Anti Virus software on JaRay.net has reported
Confirmed.. Thanks Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 2:09 PM - FamHost
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] BUGS?
I see... Nice feature.. Would it be wise then
W2K Server, Imail 8.5, KWM something, DS3
HTML formatted email with graphics fail to render the images.. Is this an
IIS problem?
Thanks,
~Rick
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.
To
http://www.infokomp.no/techinfo/doc/smtp_codes.htm
Bad domain name?
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kyle Fisher
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] 554 mail from rejected for
Yikes.. It has bugs.. Tried to move just one email to a different folder and
it moved all the email.. Not good on this end.. Think I'll stick with KWM..
It works
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Sent: Thursday, January 22,
Here's some you can use.. Might be old but should be better than nothing:
http://www.famhost.com/support/files.zip
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 2:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Well my bad.. The one I thought I was referring to was:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/34911.html
Makes me wonder why the email server's software, imail, declude, and f-prot
didn't catch it? I didn't click on anything.. The av scanned it and cleaned
it. It went by pretty quick when it
Me too.. that and the IMap service.. I have ports 143(IMAP) and 389(LDAP)
but none work with my xp pro microsoft outlook.
I even have this: objectclass=Person in the search criteria via the LDAP and
put in the ip address too.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Probably if install (ALL) the service packs for your server these errors
will go away
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=330574
~Rick
I keep getting the following Event ID`s in my external DNS is there anyway
to stop it?
Event ID 5501
DNS Server encountered bad packet from 205.158.155.16.
Rebuilding is simple.. Wipe the drives and start from scratch..
~Rick
I have to rebuild a compromised server (was not under my control before :-)
There are out several webcams all with their own ftp logins connecting to
this server.
I have no information about the preliminarily existing
Try the free online active scan virus scanner to:
http://www.pandasoftware.com/activescan/com/activescan_principal.htm
Hth,
~Rick
I have a customer (only one out of 800) on my iMail server that continually
has their email forwarded to this address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since finding this
Actually the original posting, that I posted, was referring to a
virus/trojan. No matter how anyone wants to try to piddle with words the
fact remains the same: any email that contains malicious content or
attachments that causes or could cause a computer harm, probably contains a
virus or
My Local AV went off and reported that it found an Exploit/URLSpoof that was
contained in an attached RTF document. Is this a new ploy for the spammers
to try and infect computers and force people to look at there spam? I'm
running Declude with F-Prot AV on the server and Panda on my local.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] URLSpoof contained within an RTF Doc
Any update?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Klinge
Sent
=descriptionvirus_k=100927
Matt
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Any update?
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Klinge
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 11:01 PM
Interesting article about spammer techniques:
http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,61886,00.html
~Rick
___
Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System.
To Unsubscribe:
Well I've checked the logs and can't find any instances of the X-RCPT-TO:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but there are normal RCPT TO: entries. Just hoping I'm
now bouncing forwarded email to us, that's identified as spam, onto
mhost.com. Maybe it's just a cosmetic issue at this point.
Thanks,
~Rick
Title: Message
$$
version looks like
~Rick
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
PereiraSent: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:33 AM -
FamHostTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[IMail Forum] Log Analyzer Question
Is this
A lot of our email headers have this X-RCPT-TO: mhost.com
Can anyone explain why it is like this. Could this be yet another error
within the imail spam stuff?
Here is an example of one email header:
Thanks,
~Rick
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by FamHost.com
(SMTP32) id A05A80023; Sun, 11 Jan
suspect that the
X-RCPT-TO: header is somehow a partial of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
G
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:57:35 -0600
Rick Klinge said something about [IMail Forum] Message Headers:
A lot of our email headers have this X-RCPT-TO: mhost.com
Can anyone explain why it is like
Rudy,
One could use the xcopy command with the AT command to schedule a backup..
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rudy Pieruccini
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:28 AM - FamHost
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail
but wouldn't xcopy have the same problem with open/locked files?
Rudy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Klinge
Sent: quarta-feira, 7 de janeiro de 2004 14:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Backup software
Rudy
I could be wrong but I always thought that it would not 'copy' over a file
that was open or locked. I've always thought that it would copy the file if
it was open or locked. Hmmm at least I thought it did.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a
wireless linksys print server too.. Perhaps there is an incompatibility
within the linksys devices.
Thanks Berry,
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bear
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 5:51 AM
To: Rick Klinge
Subject: Re[2
users done any patching or hotfixing recently?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Klinge
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 7:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] outlook problem
Hmm.. By golly I think you hit
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Klinge
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] outlook problem
Well that what he has, laptop (toshiba), and xp office with all
patches.
Maybe Micro$oft will release a patch
This plugs into declude junkmail right?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:48 PM - FamHost
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] SpamAssassin plugs into Declude!
I use this
8181 8383 8384 8385 8484
25 110
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of michael
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 2:53 PM - FamHost
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] imail behind cisco router with firewall
We are running Imail
Strangely enough.. We have a client that is experiencing the same issue.
Anyone else receiving ok but no send via pop?
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 4:51 PM
To: waheed
Wow.. We're blocking several class A spaces.. Hmmm.. Even at the border
router.. But then again none of our corporations currently do business with
china, japan, korea, malaysia, russia, taiwan, etc. One would think it
would easier to white list a few class C spaces for them when the time
comes.
What? John? hehe.. one more time.. But send it text based plz :-/
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] FW: root@ causing
Could it be that the host you are trying to reach is having problems? Or is
this error occuring on all your outbound attempts? This could be attributed
to other hardware too.. Switch.. Hub.. Cable.. Router or even an ACL list
that is improperly blocking icmp.
~Rick
Hi,
Per the advice of
X-IMail-Rule: B~(venturedirect worldwide|viagra|vip lounge|virgin girls):NUL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Desale
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Swen
Scott:
Is there any
Excuse me.. but why even bother buying the product if all you can do is host
web pages? Geeze I'll send you a free copy of Apache, which is far better,
and more secure to host (unlimited) web pages. Sounds to me that the
Micro$oft has a clear and concise licensing structure for there web
Yes John.. I do agree and support what you are conveying. Sorry for the
sidetrack - I'll sit humbly on the bench.
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 8:50 PM
To: [EMAIL
How does one submit all of Road Runner to ignorant.org and the major
blacklist organizations?
What's the point in having an email box that's not actively monitored?
Here's a response I got from them:
This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:
The recipient(s) indicated below
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:35:06 -0600
Rick Klinge said something about [IMail Forum] [OT] RR Spam:
How does one submit all of Road Runner to ignorant.org and the major
blacklist organizations?
What's the point in having an email box that's not actively monitored?
Here's
Ahh.. your DNS record looks strange but work. Why do you have 199.44.118.2
resolving to WWW.mgtamer.com instead of just mgtamer.com. Now there isn't
an A record for just mgtamer.com (won't resolve). Your email server is
resolving to dns.mgtamer.com instead of the old unix type MAIL.mgtamer.com
I don't know how this is possible for iMail 6.x, store/forward, they could
both run on the same server but you can only have one MTA on port 25. One
might be able to have iMail forward the mail to Exchange.. but I don't think
ver 6.x can do this? Personally I would update IMail to ver 8.x ..
FWIW We have turned off the monitoring a long time ago.. 2 years?.. although
I'm sure our traffic is very light compared to most.. it did seem to help.
Strange, one would figure that would matter though - does it?
~Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Yes this is true.. but maybe I'm on the wrong tangent here.. I'm recalling
an issue where the call to the socket/tcp state was hung open in the wait
state and would not release... thus exhausting the available sockets about
every 2 1/2 days. This is a critical issue I think that has been, I
Title: Message
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-2707-DM02.htm
no fixup protocol smtp 25
~Rick
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Hank
TownsendSent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:52 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [IMail
201 - 300 of 371 matches
Mail list logo
