...since the advent of spam are there really any rules left?
Well, I believe the old chestnut about letting your users know when
their mail has bounced is left.
Not allowing null senders is a good way to tick off sysadmins. It's
one of the few tests that some of our clients
This is more of a rant than a problem but has anyone heard of
rfc-ignorant.org?
I had a user call me the other day saying they had received some type of
error email message when trying to send to a specific address:
We had an end user here at Gibson who was expecting an email from this
- the merits of single point failures and weighted test filtering.
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remo Pistor
Sent: 26 September 2003 16:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] A little OT: dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
This is more
rejected by other mail servers, and your users will never be advised if
messages they send bounce.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Remo Pistor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 8:51 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] A little OT: dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
This is more of a rant than a problem but has anyone heard of
rfc-ignorant.org?
Yes.
So I checked the website for rfc-ignorant.org and some guy had us listed
because we refuse NULL senders.
Great! That's exactly how it is supposed to work. You violate the RFCs,
you get listed. :)
It says
