logs huge
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: Chris McFarling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly?
Yes, I do have two addresses in the SMTP DNS
that
the DNS resolver problem and the web messaging hack were pretty important.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris McFarling
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11.26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX
Guess so. I'll give it a shot.
--
Chris McFarling
Didn't this just get 'patched' via 7.12 ?
~Rick
Chris McFarling wrote:
I haven't seen any more on this the last couple days. Eric S., was the
super
debug log info helpful at all? Is this issue still being looked into or
is
it being
Message -
From: Chris McFarling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly?
Yes, I do have two addresses in the SMTP DNS address field.
(separated
by
a
space) I tried your
the warnings show
up...but they do not indicate any problems.
--Todd.
- Original Message -
From: Rick Leske [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly? (another example
reply so is looking for the example.com from the stack.
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: Chris McFarling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference correctly?
I am currently experiencing
.
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: Chris McFarling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference correctly?
I am currently experiencing this problem as I write this. Any messages
your logs huge
Eric S
- Original Message -
From: Chris McFarling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference correctly?
Yes, I do have two addresses in the SMTP DNS address field
, 2002 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference correctly?
Yes, I do have two addresses in the SMTP DNS address field. (separated
by
a
space) I tried your suggestion of using only 1 address, but it did not
make
any difference. Still get the same sequence
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris McFarling
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 12:37 PM - MGMT.TV
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly?
Right now the SMTP DNS Adress field is set to 63.85.233.135. Originally it
was set to 63.85.233.135
I'm seeing the same thing again. Although none of the mail servers are
down, I can clearly see that the one that IMail is choosing is NOT the one
with the lowest priority. I may be missing something, but this seems to be
very similar to what Chris is experiencing. Sending and receiving servers
Any static entries in your hosts file?
-- Joseph Mann
Tuesday, July 30, 2002, 2:43:32 PM, you wrote:
TR I'm seeing the same thing again. Although none of the mail servers are
TR down, I can clearly see that the one that IMail is choosing is NOT the one
TR with the lowest priority. I may be
not using MX record preference
correctly? (another example)
I'm seeing the same thing again. Although none of the mail servers are
down, I can clearly see that the one that IMail is choosing is NOT the one
with the lowest priority. I may be missing something, but this seems to be
very similar to what
-
From: Chris McFarling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly?
Yes, I do have two addresses in the SMTP DNS address field. (separated
by
a
space) I tried your suggestion
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference correctly?
Before I turn up the logging level to send to Ipswitch, has anyone
seen this before? This is the second time this has happened. It
appears that IMail does not honor the preference returned with MX
records
.
--
Chris McFarling
- Original Message -
From: Robert Stull [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly?
Just for the record. The MX priority problem that was fixed
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 4:32 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference correctly?
Show me some logs (from a packet analyzer, preferably) that show IMail
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Sunday, July 28, 2002 you wrote:
RSP (and as I have clearly stated, I do recall several versions where
RSP IMail would go to the A record sometimes when it should not have,
RSP but only after trying the MX records first).
At least the A record issue and some other DNS issues are definitely
to continue fighting about the A RECORD thing, though. ;-)
--Todd.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 10:53 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly?
Yep, Todd could certainly
Todd Ryan wrote (in part):
All I can say for sure is that messages to that domain were failing
even though the lowest proirity MX server, priority 5 (which,
coincidently, is another IMail 7.1 box) was working properly. And the
first MX record returned for that domain was priority 20 and it
Before I turn up the logging level to send to Ipswitch, has anyone
seen this before? This is the second time this has happened. It
appears that IMail does not honor the preference returned with MX
records but rather tries sending to the first one returned. Here's
what happens...
I try to send
Todd Ryan wrote:
Before I turn up the logging level to send to Ipswitch, has anyone
seen this before? This is the second time this has happened. It
appears that IMail does not honor the preference returned with MX
records but rather tries sending to the first one returned. Here's
what
the preferred box smtp1.
More to come after I get back from personal life duties this
morning ;-)
--Todd.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record
as a production server.
-Joe
- Original Message -
From: Todd Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 7:25 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference correctly?
Before I turn up the logging level to send to Ipswitch, has anyone
I've been using IMail on a limited basis since the 4.0 versions. I now
run
7.11. No version I have ever had, including 7.11 uses the MX priority
correctly. For some strange reason IMail looks for A records first which
is
a dumb way to do it.
Joe,
This seems to be a recurring theme on
I've been using IMail on a limited basis since the 4.0 versions. I
now run 7.11. No version I have ever had, including 7.11 uses the MX
priority correctly. For some strange reason IMail looks for A
records first
Sorry, but that's nonsense.
Show me some logs (from a packet analyzer,
: Saturday, July 27, 2002 3:32 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly?
I've been using IMail on a limited basis since the 4.0 versions. I
now run 7.11. No version I have ever had, including 7.11 uses the MX
priority correctly. For some strange
this many versions ago.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Joe Wolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly?
Sandy,
You can call it anything you want, fool. IMail has
- Original Message -
From: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly?
Sounds like one more unexpected reason to let IMGate deliver Imail
outbound
traffic
by IPSwitch.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Joe Wolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 4:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly?
Len,
You're absolutely correct!
But isn't it sad that the SMTP properties
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] IMail not using MX record preference
correctly?
Sandy,
You can call it anything you want, fool. IMail has never even CLAIMED to
use MX priority until 7.1. Here's an exerpt from the 7.1 new features
propoganda:
Higher-Performing - SMTP
31 matches
Mail list logo