My guess is that LDAP queries are cost even more than than SMTP RCPT
TO queries.
I should have been more clear - we use a separate LDAP server and don't query
the mail server.
If your BC is strong enough for your traffic and attacks, OK. If not,
rather than upgrading the BC, you can put
Grant wrote;
I would be interested in a screen shot of how you got this to work with
IMail. Also, how do
you keep the LDAP up-to-date? Seems to me that we had to sync it all the
time for it to see
new users. But it has been a while since we tried to get that to work.
We use a separate
: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
It looks pretty comparable, but I see they don't use resellers. While I
don't mind, is that a sign of a company that isn't very large or well sustained
yet?
TR
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Armbrecht
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 11:55 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
All,
For those of you using Barracuda appliance, may I get your feedback on your
experience. Ease of use? Versus Imail Premium? Versus
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Len Conrad
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 1:45 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
We have two 400 for incoming and one 200 for out going. The main drawback
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 10:27 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
I agree with Len. IMGate can handle a substantial volume of email, on
relatively modest hardware. AND you can have
and this
system flat out Rocks!
Todd Hunter
Smart Mail
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 11:55 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
All,
For those of you using
Does anyone else have any experience with a MailFoundry appliance? It
looks, on paper, to be much better than the Barracuda and it has all
features available at all levels. I just don't see that much about it
online and I have called my three main resellers I deal with and they don't
even sell
. And If things get really =
busy, I
drop another one in and do some clustering.
=20
TR
=20
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 10:27 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
=20
I agree
: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
It does sound like IMGate is great, but I don't want to learn another OS and
I love the flexibility if giving users the ability to handle their own
filters and quarantine with the Barracuda. And If things get really busy, I
drop another one in and do some
It does sound like IMGate is great, but I don't want to learn
another OS and I love the flexibility if giving users the ability to
handle their own filters and quarantine with the Barracuda.
As I said, if you go Barracuda, you can go with a cheaper box and
cheaper subscription, saving
100K bad recipients? BC send 50K queries to Imail.)
correction, of course, BC passes thru 100K queries to Imail. That's
the problem a closed box. IMGate can be integrated with mailbox
servers since IMGate is an open solution on generic hardware you provide.
Len
To Unsubscribe:
Travis,
I have a spec sheet for the 2100 unit in PDF format; I'll send that to you
offlist.
Randy A.
Global Web Solutions Inc.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Rabe
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 1:37 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT
] on behalf of Len Conrad
Sent: Tue 10/9/2007 3:35 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
It does sound like IMGate is great, but I don't want to learn
another OS and I love the flexibility if giving users the ability to
handle their own filters
: Grant Griffith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent 10/9/2007 4:25:03 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400I will chime in here now... We
had a Cuda 800 ordered to take over for
our overloaded 400 unit. And with Len's help we placed 2 MX Gateways
running his
Conrad
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 3:47 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
100K bad recipients? BC send 50K queries to Imail.)
correction, of course, BC passes thru 100K queries to Imail. That's
the problem a closed box. IMGate can
entirety.
TR
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Anton
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 2:24 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
Anybody using Alligate or any other WINDOWS based solution in front of
Barracuda
Does Barracuda really accept the WHOLE message before running its tests???
Depends on which tests you run. ;) The RBL/IP based tests and invalid
recipient tests are run during the SMTP conversation - the scoring and virus
scanning are done after the message is completely received, naturally.
You don't have to set it up this way; our Barracudas do the lookup
against LDAP
My guess is that LDAP queries are cost even more than than SMTP RCPT
TO queries.
In either case, unlike native postfix, there seems to be no
negative/positive caching so every incoming msg generates another
I just called Barracuda and spoke to an Engineer. The appliances
*do not* accept the whole message before tests are run
There's no proprietary stuff here, BC can't do anything special with SMTP.
The Barracuda runs postfix, probably modified, and can do envelope
checks on PTR/FROM/TO/HELO,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David Weber
Sent: Tue 10/9/2007 5:34 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
You don't have to set it up this way; our Barracudas do the lookup against LDAP
- no impact on the mail servers AFAIK
My guess is that LDAP queries are cost even more than than SMTP RCPT
TO queries.
Checking via RCPT against mail server that in turn validates every
recipient against an LDAP server will obviously be slower, usually
many times slower, than checking against that same LDAP server
All,
For those of you using Barracuda appliance, may I get your feedback on your
experience. Ease of use? Versus Imail Premium? Versus Symantec Mail
Security? Versus anything else? Reliability?
Regards,
Travis
I'd be interested in feedback concerning this too.
-Original Message-
From: Travis Rabe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 12:55 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
All,
For those of you using Barracuda appliance
Travis, I have not used a Cuda but IMHO Declude beats all hands down.
John T
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 9:55 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
All
Does Declude do per user quratine and login? Per user anti=spam portal
settings?
TR
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists)
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 10:30 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
1200 Grandview Ave
Des Moines IA 50316
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
515-263-2961
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Travis Rabe
Sent: Mon 10/8/2007 11:55 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
All,
For those of you using
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
Travis-
I've been running a 400 for 9 months, couldn't be happier. It replaced
Declude Virus and JunkMail that I was big fan of for years. Finally Declude
could not keep up with the Junk Mail and I was having to change scoring
weights
Does the Oulook plug-in work well as well as the quarantine?
TR
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Olson
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 10:57 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
Travis-
I've been
something in front before
Barracuda.
Thank you
Balaji.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Olson
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 10:57 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
Travis
PROTECTED]
Sent 10/8/2007 12:55:23 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400All, For those of you using
Barracuda appliance, may I get
your feedback on your experience. Ease of use? Versus Imail
Premium? Versus Symantec Mail Security? Versus anything else
@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
We have two 400 for incoming and one 200 for out going. The main drawback
is, it can't handle volume of emails. So we setup one 400 with some rules
and one 400 with more rules.
In my opinion, it is one of the solution
We aren't using per user mode with our Barracuda. We had issues with that part
of the setup and Imail. We don't miss it.
-Joe
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent 10/8/2007 2:12:28 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200
] on behalf of Travis Rabe
Sent: Mon 10/8/2007 1:08 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
Does the Oulook plug-in work well as well as the quarantine?
TR
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil Olson
Sent: Monday, October
We have two 400 for incoming and one 200 for out going. The main
drawback is, it can't handle volume of emails.
This is the main complaint I see from my clients who have
Barracuda. More than one has placed IMGate out front in exactly the
same role as IMGate plays for IMail, to remove the
Grandview Ave
Des Moines IA 50316
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
515-263-2961
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Neil Olson
Sent: Mon 10/8/2007 1:36 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
Yes, sometimes too well. There are two
everyone to the device as a complimentary piece of the pie.
Randy A.
Global Web Solutions Inc.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Rabe
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 12:55 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
All
Interesting. Product looks good. Anyone else use Mailfoundry device?
Compared to a Barracuda?
TR
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Armbrecht
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 12:08 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
Interesting. Product looks good. Anyone else use Mailfoundry device?
Compared to a Barracuda?
TR
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Armbrecht
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 12:08 PM
To: Imail_Forum
.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Foresman
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
Those are priced per user so looks a bit expensive for us.
Regards,
Bill Foresman
Matrosity
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda 200/400
Mailfoundry is not prices per user; it's priced per appliance model. They
suggest the number of domains and users that should be on an appliance, but
this is a guideline. It all depends on the amount of mail processed thru
Hi All -
Our opt-in newsletter is being rejected by users with Barracuda firewalls as
spam. I'm looking for a single place to report this / request to be
whitelisted at Barracuda, and I'm having no luck.
Any pointers appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Rob
LovenSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 3:53 PMTo:
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda
vs MXLogic?
Can anyone out there comment on
the effectiveness of a tool like a Barracuda vs the hosted AS services like
MXLogic? A few of our customers domains
Can anyone out there comment on the effectiveness of a tool
like a Barracuda vs the hosted AS services like MXLogic? A few of our customers
domains are getting mauled by directory attacks and just a general huge wave of
spam and were trying to find a solution. MXLogic looks nice for the
Jason,We just a Barracuda in place about 4 weeks ago. So far, we love it. It's not perfect, but it's stopping about 95% of the mail sent (out of an average of 200k messages daily) to our network right off the bat. Behind that we're putting a second gateway running our old copy of iMail (we've
Is anyone using a
barracuda spam firewall with imail? if so, what did you have to do to get ldap
to work. from the barracuda i can not successfully test the ldap connection from
the domains tab. error is "must enter a valid email address"any suggestions
would be appreciated!
TIA
Jim
Got to http://forum.barracudanetworks.com
and register. They have few threads on this very subject
Tom
From: Jim Bruner
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005
11:13 AMTo: Imail ForumSubject: [IMail Forum] OT:
Barracuda
Is anyone using a
barracuda spam firewall
: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 11:21 AMTo:
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda
Got to http://forum.barracudanetworks.com
and register. They have few threads on this very subject
Tom
From: Jim Bruner
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005
: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:31 PMTo:
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda
i've been there...they are not clear and are not working
for meany ideas
Jim W. Bruner
Network Admin.
CDB Software, Inc.
11200 Richmond Ave. Suite
#500
Houston, Texas 77082
: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:11 PMTo:
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Barracuda
I just posted a response to your
question on that list. If you search the archives for this list you should
find the answers also.
Thanks,Grant GriffithEI8HT LEGS, A Division of
ETC
50 matches
Mail list logo
