We had to rebuild our Windows 2000 web server due to a virus problem. We need
to load FrontPage Extensions but Microsoft appears to have removed them from
their web site. Does anyone have a copy they would be willing to pass along?
Or, perhaps, a .NET version compatible with Windows 2000?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:14 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS 5.0 FrontPage Extensions
| We had to rebuild our Windows 2000 web server due to a virus problem. We
need to load FrontPage Extensions but Microsoft appears to have removed them
BTW Kim, I forgot to mention that I have a copy I can send. Where to?
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Tom Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS 5.0 FrontPage Extensions
| Yes, MS has pulled
BTW Kim, I forgot to mention that I have a copy I can send. Where to?
Tom
Thanks, Tom. I sent you a reply off list.
Kim W. Premuda
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ:
Does
anyone know of a free utility that will scan an IIS log file and tell me which
lines are bad? WebTrends cannot get past a day of log file and it wont tell
me which line(s) are bad. I would like to omit just the bad line(s) instead of
the whole day. Does anyone know of a way to do
*After the IIS snap in is added, the problem stayed (tested within
the console) so I did not want to save it. If I can manually add the
snap in without the problem persisting, then I will save the config
- but I am not sure were to save it in order to overwrite the old
one. Do you know
Forum] OT: IIS 5.0 error
We are experiencing an error on an internal server here that will not
go
away. When you click on server name in IIS:
A non-fatal configuration occurred. Not all available
information may be displayed.
Sounds like (a) if you're lucky, a registration error fixable
We are experiencing an error on an internal server here that will not go
away. When you click on server name in IIS:
A non-fatal configuration occurred. Not all available
information may be displayed.
Has anyone ever experienced this?
Any ideas would help.
Thanks in advance,
J.J. Beatrice,
We are experiencing an error on an internal server here that will not go
away. When you click on server name in IIS:
A non-fatal configuration occurred. Not all available
information may be displayed.
Sounds like (a) if you're lucky, a registration error fixable by rebuilding your IIS
MSC from
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS 5.0 error
We are experiencing an error on an internal server here that will not
go
away. When you click on server name in IIS:
A non-fatal configuration occurred. Not all available
information may be displayed.
Sounds like (a) if you're lucky
Title: RE: Re[3]: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
Sharon --
We had the same problem. When we used hfnetchk, it appears that perhaps the patches didn't really get applied the first time or two around. Luckily, we only had one IIS server out of nine infected.
/ljb
-Original Message-
From
I've never written to this list previously, not that it's relevant at all.
As far as the bashing goes, I didn't see any. Microsoft didn't lead this
charge, it was an effort by all computer companies. If it weren't for IBM and
Compaq, MS wouldn't have had anything to write for. We might also want
Len,
Making money from fearmongering may be considerably less evil than
Microsoft's business tactics, but that doesn't make it endorsable.
Nor, to refer to the specific reason for my counter-post, should it
make Mike's aversion to such studies instant flame bait! Also, as J.
:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
Why did you feel it necessary to flame? It's quite clear from Mike's
response that he meant that we don't have to take the advice of shills
like those from the Gartner Group who profit from the
multi-thousand
not to defend MS, but you are forgetting what software used to cost before
MS came on the scene and brought down the prices on software by 1000's of
dollars...
what other in Fortune 500 has gross margins of 80%? their software is too
expensive because they extract/bleed monopoly prices.
Len
often, although I know that's not an excuse.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 5:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
Please... I'm on this list to gain knowledge
At 05:43 AM 9/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
not to defend MS, but you are forgetting what software used to cost before
MS came on the scene and brought down the prices on software by 1000's of
dollars...
what other in Fortune 500 has gross margins of 80%? their software is too
expensive because
is better.
Regards,
Mike Achenbach
- Original Message -
From: Dan Shadix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
Then I'd guess you probably don't need this list to tell you how to run
Imail. Or did you
, 2001 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
Why did you feel it necessary to flame? It's quite clear from Mike's
response that he meant that we don't have to take the advice of shills
like those from the Gartner Group who profit from the
multi
Message-
JT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Beach
JT Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:20 AM
JT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JT Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
JT For all of you IIS Admins out there:
JT Gartner recommends that enterprises hit by both Code Red
Oh darn, I'm so sorry for my vicious retort. I'd forgotten how badly
words can hurt. If you thought that was a flame you obviously haven't
been around very long.
Of course everyone will make a decision based on what they feel is best
for them. The original post didn't try to tell anyone
The problem with all this is, YOU started the bashing. All the first
post on this did was point out an article that contained information
relevant to most of the list members. It didn't bash an OS or try to
convince seasoned admins of anything. It didn't even say that it was
a good
Dan,
How sensitive of you to be sarcastic in return! And how mature of you
to trivialize--and reduce BACK to a flame war--an issue that, despite
its beginnings in an off-topic hyperlink, has produced intelligent
comment on both sides!
For anyone who wonders, here's the flame in question:
the finger
nearest the delete key and get over it!!
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Shadix
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
The problem with all this is, YOU
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JT www.reliancesoft.com
JT
JT -Original Message-
JT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Beach
JT Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:20 AM
JT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JT Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
JT For all of you IIS Admins out
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
andyb@thumpernet
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
My web server *was* patched and it got the virus *anyway*. Same thing
for another web server admin near here.
Thanks, andyb
[EMAIL
This is of course patently untrue. If it wasn't for IBM's assistance with
OS/2, WinNT would never have come out when it did and Windows 2000 wouldn't
have been MS's first good OS. OS/2 was light years (Warp speed even! :-))
ahead of Windows NT for a long time. I know I ran a multiline BBS that
At 10:17 AM 9/26/01 -0400, andyb@thumpernet wrote:
My web server *was* patched and it got the virus *anyway*. Same thing
for another web server admin near here.
To back this up, we had 18 NT boxes online last week
when it hit (19 now) and three of them were hit.
Our patches were up to date
, ext. 104
JT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JT www.reliancesoft.com
JT
JT -Original Message-
JT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Beach
JT Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:20 AM
JT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JT Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
JT For all of you IIS
: Sharon Tucci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:17 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
At 10:17 AM 9/26/01 -0400, andyb@thumpernet wrote:
My web server *was* patched and it got the virus *anyway*. Same thing
for another web server admin near here
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
The problem with all this is, YOU started the bashing. All the first
post on this did was point out an article that contained information
relevant to most of the list members. It didn't bash an OS
: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
snip/snip
What I find curious is that even though our .html files
were modified and I KNOW we were infected, the clean nimda
utility from Symantec said we didn't have it. Go figure.
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from
Sharon,
I don't know about smaller retailers, but certainly the Warehouses and
CDWs of the world weren't where they are now ten years ago, and they
seem to have no compunction about featuring MS products. When I used
to set up Open Licenses for a Fortune 50 company, the VAR never
]]On Behalf Of
andyb@thumpernet
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
My web server *was* patched and it got the virus *anyway*. Same thing
for another web server admin near here.
Thanks, andyb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday
Hi Sharon,
Thank you... my how some people just don't believe...
Thanks, andyb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, September 26, 2001, 12:17:56 PM, you wrote:
ST At 10:17 AM 9/26/01 -0400, andyb@thumpernet wrote:
My web server *was* patched and it got the virus *anyway*. Same thing
for another web
@thumpernet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sharon Tucci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:14 PM
Subject: Re[3]: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
Hi Sharon,
Thank you... my how some people just don't believe...
Thanks, andyb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, September 26, 2001
Thanks for the tip. Since we remotely manage our servers,
how can we close shared drives and still access them?
Yes, I realize that probably sounds stupid -- but I had
to ask :)
At 09:09 PM 9/26/01 -0700, Mike Hell wrote:
nimda sneaks its way in thru open network shares (shared drives).
For all of you IIS Admins out there:
Gartner recommends that enterprises hit by both Code Red and Nimda
immediately investigate alternatives to IIS, including moving Web
applications to Web server software from other vendors, such as iPlanet and
Apache, explains Gartner's John Pescatore.
- Original Message -
From: Bill Beach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 9:20 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
For all of you IIS Admins out there:
Gartner recommends that enterprises hit by both Code Red and Nimda
immediately investigate
on with our lives. At least that's my opinion.
Kevin Childers
NetQuick Customer Support.
(910) 486-7845
(888) 228-0312
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
Please
Dan,
Why did you feel it necessary to flame? It's quite clear from Mike's
response that he meant that we don't have to take the advice of shills
like those from the Gartner Group who profit from the
multi-thousand-dollar prices they affix to their full reports. GG
has a
Why did you feel it necessary to flame? It's quite clear from Mike's
response that he meant that we don't have to take the advice of shills
like those from the Gartner Group who profit from the
multi-thousand-dollar prices they affix to their full reports. GG
has a clear
: Len Conrad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:58 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
Why did you feel it necessary to flame? It's quite clear from Mike's
response that he meant that we don't have to take the advice of shills
like those from
Forum] OT: IIS
For all of you IIS Admins out there:
Gartner recommends that enterprises hit by both Code Red and Nimda
immediately investigate alternatives to IIS, including moving Web
applications to Web server software from other vendors, such as iPlanet
and
Apache, explains Gartner's
, ext. 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Beach
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT: IIS
For all of you IIS Admins out there:
Gartner
Hi ...
We want to write a component in VB6 that will allow us to administer IIS
websites ... Could anybody point us in the right direction? Also, from
what I have read I have only seen that to enable FP2000 extension you
have to use a form and use the fpadmin.dll. Is this the case?
cheers
Phil
]
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT :: IIS Visual Basic
Hi ...
We want to write a component in VB6 that will allow us to
administer IIS
websites ... Could anybody point us in the right direction? Also, from
what I have read I have only seen that to enable FP2000 extension you
have to use a form
in hearing about it...
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Daws" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 9:19 PM
Subject: [IMail Forum] OT :: IIS Visual Basic
Hi ...
We want to write a component in VB6 that will allow us to administer IIS
websites
Hi ...
Has anybody come across a ActiveX/COM component for
creating new virtual websites etc under IIS4/5?
I know it can be done through ADSI and WSCRIPT but
I dont have time to work it out.
regards
Phil
49 matches
Mail list logo
