Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Return-Path vs. Reply-To

2005-05-27 Thread Dale McDiarmid
Very nice. Thank you, I appreciate your help. Thx, D. At 02:16 PM 5/26/2005, you wrote: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.htmlRFChttp://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html 2822 seems to say both are optional, but I'm not clear on the differences, so I have two questions... The

[IMail Forum] OT: Return-Path vs. Reply-To

2005-05-26 Thread Dale McDiarmid
Hello...my apologies in advance for the off-topic... I'm writing a database that downloads emails, processes them, and replies. I notice that if I send an email from my Eudora to my gmail account there's a header: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and if I send an email from gmail to my Eudora

Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Return-Path vs. Reply-To

2005-05-26 Thread Sanford Whiteman
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.htmlRFChttp://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html 2822 seems to say both are optional, but I'm not clear on the differences, so I have two questions... The difference is that the Reply-To: is created by the MUA within the message data (headers/body), while