Re: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses

2006-06-17 Thread Rod Dorman
On Friday, June 16, 2006, 16:15:20, Tripp Allen wrote: The precedence bulk line was removed in 2006.1 and replaced by x-imail: list due to multiple customer requests. It was reported that AOL blocks messages as spam that contain this header and AOL subscribers can't receive list messages. So

[IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses

2006-06-16 Thread Michael Hoyt
Has anyone noticed the increase in the number of autoresponses and vacation messages to posting to this list? Maybe it is just vacation season and changing job season and changing work schedule season---or maybe the Precedence: list or Precedence: bulk header is missing from the list server

Re: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses

2006-06-16 Thread Matti Haack
MH Hey Tyran, nice catch on the Precedence header! Looks like nobody at ipswitch cares about this as the fact was discovered already one week before... Or they are unable to solve it... Precedence: bulk is missing in the mail headers. As I didn't dare to update to 2006, can anybody check if

Re: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses

2006-06-16 Thread Michael Hoyt
- Original Message - From: Matti Haack [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Hoyt Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 9:55 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses MH Hey Tyran, nice catch on the Precedence header! Looks like nobody at ipswitch

RE: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses

2006-06-16 Thread John T \(Lists\)
responses - Original Message - From: Matti Haack [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Hoyt Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 9:55 AM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses MH Hey Tyran, nice catch on the Precedence header! Looks like

RE: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses

2006-06-16 Thread Tripp Allen
. Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:44 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses Actually, this person is using Imail 9.03

Re: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses

2006-06-16 Thread Michael Hoyt
- From: John T (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:43 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses Actually, this person is using Imail 9.03 and the headers of the notice I received directly from her has the proper

Re: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses

2006-06-16 Thread Michael Hoyt
:(650) 326-1648 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.commarts.com - Original Message - From: Tripp Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:15 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses The precedence bulk

RE: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses

2006-06-16 Thread John T \(Lists\)
PROTECTED] 626-737-6003 Fax 626-737-6004 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Imail_Forum- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hoyt Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 1:22 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses

RE: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses

2006-06-16 Thread Bruce Barnes
Of John T (Lists) Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 16:35 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Precedence: list the auto responses Here is the header from the message directly received from her: Received: from srv5.eservicesforyou.com [192.168.41.40] by maila.eservicesforyou.net