[IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Robert
Dear list, please make sure that the rules stated in an earlier thread are followed. Not only emphasize turning off return reciepts but not to never have automated responses of any kind! IMHO we've seen enough of the 'Out of office replies'. regards // Robert To Unsubscribe:

Re: [IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Michael Hoyt
As has been said before-the reason you are seeing these automated responses is because the list server is not adding the Precedence: list or Precedence: bulk header. The problem is not with misconfigured auto responders or vacation messages. Yes, we have all seen enough of these, but the Fix

RE: [IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Tripp Allen
PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Responding to list As has been said before-the reason you are seeing these automated responses is because the list server is not adding the Precedence: list or Precedence: bulk header. The problem is not with misconfigured auto

Re: [IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Darin Cox
: Thursday, June 22, 2006 12:52 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Responding to list The precedence: bulk will be back when we load the next preview version of 2006.1 on the list server. There is a rule blocking read receipt requests. Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: [IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Tripp Allen
Hopefully we can get it loaded next week. Tripp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 1:05 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Responding to list Hi Tripp, When do you

Re: [IMail Forum] Responding to list

2006-06-22 Thread Rod Dorman
On Thursday, June 22, 2006, 12:52:16, Tripp Allen wrote: The precedence: bulk will be back when we load the next preview version of 2006.1 on the list server. Just curious, why not Precedence: list? IMHO its more descriptive of the contents. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The avalanche has already