Re: [IMail Forum] Rules for empty body

2005-11-16 Thread Duane Hill
On Tuesday, November 15, 2005 at 10:17:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: Hi, I'm trying to find a rule to filter Mail containing a image only. The rule to filter an empty body would be: B!~(\w|\S). This would not work if an image is in the body. the image tag img

Re: [IMail Forum] Rules for empty body

2005-11-16 Thread Martin Schaible
Hi Duane, I don't see the point. SpamAssasin has really nothing to do with the filters from IMail . Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 um 15:00 schrieben Sie: On Tuesday, November 15, 2005 at 10:17:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: Hi, I'm

Re: [IMail Forum] Rules for empty body

2005-11-16 Thread Duane Hill
Never mind, then. On Wednesday, November 16, 2005 at 2:47:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: Hi Duane, I don't see the point. SpamAssasin has really nothing to do with the filters from IMail . Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 um 15:00

Re: [IMail Forum] Rules for empty body

2005-11-16 Thread Duane Hill
A more understandable never mind. I realize SA has nothing to do with the filters for IMail. Unfortunately IMail is not that extensive in the area of regular expressions. However, if you were running something that had the ability to use SA, there are pre-defined

[IMail Forum] Rules for empty body

2005-11-15 Thread Martin Schaible
Hi, I'm trying to find a rule to filter Mail containing a image only. The rule to filter an empty body would be: B!~(\w|\S). This would not work if an image is in the body. the image tag img src=3Dcid:355c628c0d1c32416ab32a0657415cc7 is a text. I'm not sure, If the parser excludes Image from