: Re: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
We are planning to add support for Apache. For the upcoming WS_FTP
Server
with SSH 2006, we are launching with both IIS and Apache support.
Is this preferred, by many, over IIS?
No.
Darrell
by a few expert users before officially publishing.
bye for now,
kg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert E.
Spivack
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 7:03 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
IIS please, but let's fix the problem with IUSER needing full control as
well ;)
David Gregg wrote:
We are planning to add support for Apache. For the upcoming WS_FTP
Server
with SSH 2006, we are launching with both IIS and Apache support
AM
To: Kevin Gillis
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
You need to take a poll. IIS is preferred here.
Thursday, January 5, 2006, 8:49:54 AM, Kevin Gillis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
KG Hi Oblio,
KG We are planning to add support for Apache. For the upcoming WS_FTP
Server
KG
If a firm is selling an application for a certain platform, it is a
reasonable expectation for the author to be reasonably astute about
that platform, including the minimum requirements for the application
to run. 'Minimum' includes the minimum NTFS security settings under IIS
and particularly
At 1/4/2006 08:50 PM, you wrote:
As for your statement addressing explaining the long hold times (staying
with a customer as long as it takes). In all fairness to your other
paying customers, IPSwitch should support *one* set of web installation
instructions and not spend time working with
At 1/4/2006 08:50 PM, you wrote:
As for your statement addressing explaining the long hold times
(staying with a customer as long as it takes). In all fairness to
your other paying customers, IPSwitch should support *one* set of
web installation instructions and not spend time working with
.
Bruce Barnes
ChicagoNetTech Inc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 08:15
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
At 1/4/2006 08:50 PM, you wrote
If a firm is selling an application for a certain platform, it is a
reasonable expectation for the author to be reasonably astute about
that platform, including the minimum requirements for the application
to run. 'Minimum' includes the minimum NTFS security settings under IIS
and particularly
Of Oblio
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 8:47 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
At 1/4/2006 08:50 PM, you wrote:
As for your statement addressing explaining the long hold times
(staying with a customer as long as it takes). In all fairness
I beg to disagree with your comment.
Allowing admins of networks to personally decide the level of security
they
want to have in their individual networks flies in the face of all
security
standards!
No sir. an admin must make certain his or her network is secure. S/he
should not trust
We are planning to add support for Apache. For the upcoming WS_FTP Server
with SSH 2006, we are launching with both IIS and Apache support.
Is this preferred, by many, over IIS?
bye for now,
kg
I would prefer to use IIS.
Add support for Apache and .NET emulators means your product *may* be
Is this preferred, by many, over IIS?
KG bye for now,
KG kg
KG -Original Message-
KG From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Oblio
KG Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 8:47 AM
KG To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
KG Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02
: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:13 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
We are planning to add support for Apache. For the upcoming WS_FTP Server
with SSH 2006, we are launching with both IIS and Apache support.
Is this preferred, by many
Second that... if you're measuring response, Kevin.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: David Gregg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
We are planning to add support
IIS here as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 7:44 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
Second that... if you're measuring response
than any other method I know of.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: David Gregg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
If a firm is selling an application for a certain platform
I vote for IIs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:50 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
Hi Oblio,
We are planning to add support
.
Richard Bowman wrote:
I vote for IIs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kevin Gillis
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 9:50 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
Hi Oblio,
We are planning
Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
KG At 1/4/2006 08:50 PM, you wrote:
As for your statement addressing explaining the long hold times
(staying with a customer as long as it takes). In all fairness to
your other paying customers, IPSwitch should support *one* set of
web installation
On Thursday, January 5, 2006, 12:19:42, John T (Lists) wrote:
A poll was done, and it did show IIS is preferred.
Preferred perhaps but not unanimous. Some of us would still like the
option of using apache.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Program /n./
1. A magic spell
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Gregg
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 8:51 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Status of IMail 2006.02...
Kevin,
I understand the frustration... I've personally been on dozens of calls
and
emails
We are planning to add support for Apache. For the upcoming WS_FTP Server
with SSH 2006, we are launching with both IIS and Apache support.
Is this preferred, by many, over IIS?
No.
Darrell
Check out
IIS please, but let's fix the problem with IUSER needing full control as
well ;)
David Gregg wrote:
We are planning to add support for Apache. For the upcoming WS_FTP
Server
with SSH 2006, we are launching with both IIS and Apache support.
Is this preferred, by many, over IIS?
bye for
Hello Heimir and all,
I understand the frustration... I've personally been on dozens of calls and
emails resolving issues, including over the holidays.
But we are not trying to deceive customers and sorry that you feel that way.
There are lots of customers running IMail 2006 and 2006.01 and for
Kevin,
I understand the frustration... I've personally been on dozens of calls
and
emails resolving issues, including over the holidays.
As usual, your participation and comments are always appreciated.
We are happy with the new 2006 product so far (on new installs). It seems to
work
26 matches
Mail list logo
