Hello,
Has anyone considered putting the spool partition on a RAM drive? I
haven't thought about RAM drives since DOS but for a Store and Forward
server it would mean the messages would never have to touch the hard
drive's I/O system. Right?
Any thoughts or caveats?
--
Best regards,
Any thoughts or caveats?
The ramdrive.sys from the DDK tops out at 32 MB, I believe, so don't
use that one! We've used the third-party RAM drive software from
SuperSpeed, which works amazingly well as an accelerator. The caveat
is clear: BSOD, power outage, etc. = an unknowable
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sullivan
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Store/Forward Server Spool Partition on RAM Drive
Hello,
Has anyone considered putting the spool partition on a RAM drive? I
haven't thought about RAM
about life-span.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sullivan
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Store/Forward Server Spool Partition on RAM Drive
Hello,
Has anyone considered
Has anyone considered putting the spool partition on a RAM drive?
sure, esp when on an IMGate relay, the msgs typically spend less the 10
seconds in the system.
I
haven't thought about RAM drives since DOS but for a Store and Forward
server it would mean the messages would never have to touch
Hello Len,
Friday, September 19, 2003, 2:43:28 PM, you wrote:
LC sure, esp when on an IMGate relay, the msgs typically spend less the 10
LC seconds in the system.
Without RAM drive my IMGate messages usually see a delay of about 3
secs.
LC the big problem is the size of the ram disk. What
