[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:49 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Win2000 mirroring
Same topic - different question.
I assume you can add mirroring to an existing single boot drive server?
Dan Spangenberg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
i am building a new server for imail. i had intended on buying an promise
fasttrax sata150 tx4 raid controller in order to use disk mirroring. i
ordered the wrong controller. i bought the sata150 controller as oposed to
the fasttrax sata150 raid controller(my bad). i am wanting to get some input
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Bruner
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 9:13 AM
To: Imail Forum (E-mail)
Subject: [IMail Forum] Win2000 mirroring
i am building a new server for imail. i had intended on buying an promise
fasttrax
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Software mirroring is slower and adds workload to the CPU. However,
depending on the load, this may not make much of a difference.
Also, (at least on W2K mirroring) the information used by the OS to do the
mirroring is stored on the primary drive. If that hard
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Win2000 mirroring
Software mirroring is slower and adds workload to the CPU. However,
depending on the load, this may not make much
At 12:49 PM 9/15/2003, Chris Scott wrote:
Software mirroring is slower and adds workload to the CPU. However,
depending on the load, this may not make much of a difference.
Also, (at least on W2K mirroring) the information used by the OS to do the
mirroring is stored on the primary drive. If
Software mirroring is slower and adds workload to the CPU. However,
depending on the load, this may not make much of a difference.
Also, (at least on W2K mirroring) the information used by the OS to do
the
mirroring is stored on the primary drive. If that hard drive goes bad in
the area
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 09:49
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Win2000 mirroring
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Software mirroring is slower and adds workload to the CPU. However,
depending
]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Win2000 mirroring
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 09:49
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Win2000 mirroring
John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote:
Software mirroring is slower
