Do you see you db failing SMTP AUTH in Imail log?
sys log is thus:
09:16 12:42 SMTPD(E32F024E) [64.119.37.242] HELO mail.mydomain.com
09:16 12:42 SMTPD(E32F024E) [64.119.37.242] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
09:16 12:42 SMTPD(E32F024E) [64.119.37.242] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
09:16 12:42
Do you see you db failing SMTP AUTH in Imail log?
sys log is thus:
09:16 12:42 SMTPD(E32F024E) [64.119.37.242] HELO mail.mydomain.com
09:16 12:42 SMTPD(E32F024E) [64.119.37.242] MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
09:16 12:42 SMTPD(E32F024E) [64.119.37.242] RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
09:16 12:42
Do you see you db failing SMTP AUTH in Imail log?
sys log is thus:
09:16 12:42 SMTPD(E32F024E) [64.119.37.242] HELO mail.mydomain.com
your SMTP client has to say EHLO in order to receive ESMTP extended service
announcements, including AUTH options.
09:16 12:42 SMTPD(E32F024E) [64.119.37.242]
why don't you relay for address your db box?
My boss is reticent.
he thinks your db box is a spammer?
I changed my database smtp server from mail.mydomain.com to
10.0.0.[mailserv_ip], and then set IMail to relay for IPs; 10.0.0.[database_ip]
I'd prefer to have my database do authentication
I'd prefer to have my database do authentication properly, since now
there's a bit more coding and an extra table for the database
An extra _table_? It would seem to be better (and faster) storing the
SMTP AUTH creds in a couple of constants in your code or in a settings
file.
But that's
