HI Bonno,
I'll add this to the wish list.
Thanks,
Tripp
From: Bonno Bloksma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 6:54 AM
To: IMail_Forum
Cc: Tripp Allen (Ipswitch)
Subject: feature request
Hi Tripp,
With the recent development of the GBUdb mechanism in Sniffer
You can use the whitelist on the SMTP service for this purpose. Also as a
clarification the sending server has to cross the invalid user threshold in one
connection. For emails with less than that number of addresses it shouldn't
make a difference as each message should be a different
, July 26, 2006 11:05 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] feature request
hello oblio,
good request - want to follow up...
so are you looking for a mark as spam interface in the web messaging
client where the en user could do things like select 1 or more messages from
for now,
kg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John E.
Richardson
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 10:50 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] feature request + another
Thanks Kevin,
I'll add a couple more comments of my
hello oblio,
good request - want to follow up...
so are you looking for a mark as spam interface in the web messaging
client where the en user could do things like select 1 or more messages from
folder (say inbox), then select the mark as spam button/link which would
auto send the selected
No, I'm saying that, according to RFC2142, I have to have an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address. IMail currently creates a 'postmaster'
alias for root@, I just want an auto-created alias for 'abuse', so
all the domains can be RFC compliant.
Oblio
At 7/26/2006 11:05 AM, you wrote:
hello oblio,
good
I think he wants an abuse account just like root so we
don't have to create one each time. It could be an alias to root even.
Kevin Gillis wrote:
hello oblio,
good request - want to follow up...
so are you looking for a "mark as spam" interface in the web messaging
client where the en
No, I'm saying that, according to RFC2142, I have to have an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address. IMail currently creates a 'postmaster'
alias for root@, I just want an auto-created alias for 'abuse', so all the
domains can be RFC compliant.
Absolutely! An 'abuse' alias autocreated that forwards to
even better would be a default email since hosting
customers are VERY unlikely to check that account anyway.
David Gregg wrote:
No, I'm saying that, according to RFC2142, I
have to have an "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" address. IMail currently creates
a 'postmaster' alias for root@, I just want an
26, 2006 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] feature request
No, I'm saying that, according to RFC2142, I have to have an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] address. IMail currently creates a 'postmaster'
alias for root@, I just want an auto-created alias for 'abuse', so all the
domains can be RFC compliant
: [IMail Forum] feature
request
I think he wants an abuse account just like root so we
don't have to create one each time. It could be an alias to root
even.Kevin Gillis wrote:
hello oblio,
good request - want to follow up...
so are you looking for a "mark as spam" interface in the web
Hi,
This feature request should be already on the feature request list from ipswitch. I remember, that this was reported long time ago. Remember, that the abuse alias/account is a "must2, defined in RFC.
Usually i forget to create this alias after creating a new domain. So, it should be
@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] feature request
hello oblio,
good request - want to follow up...
so are you looking for a mark as spam interface in the web messaging
client where the en user could do things like select 1 or more messages from
folder (say inbox), then select the mark
across T/C/B, then select and add separately. Hope this helps.
bye for now,
kg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John E.
Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 2:28 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] feature request
Hi,
There's no requirement that the storage mechanism that IMail uses should
be understandable by anything other than an IMail process.
That would be great if the the storage mechanism that IMail uses has no
other impact. However, by now two incidents hare occured where the new
mechanism has
,
Bonno Bloksma
- Original Message -
From: Tripp Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Feature request, deleting deleted mail
You can follow the instructions in this KB article to turn off compression
Hi,
Might I put in a feature request? I have problems with deleted mail still
showing up as well. In my case it's with f-prot scanning all mailboxes
and
finding virusses in mails which have allready been deleted but not yet
purged.
There's no requirement that the storage mechanism that
Bloksma
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 3:36 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Feature request, deleting deleted mail
Hi Tripp,
I read the KB article, my mail was in response to a message from you in this
forum where you pointed to that article.
However, my problem
On Friday, January 13, 2006, 04:08:29, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
There's no requirement that the storage mechanism that IMail uses should
be understandable by anything other than an IMail process.
That would be great if the the storage mechanism that IMail uses has no
other impact. However, by now
You can follow the instructions in this KB article to turn off compression
so mail will be immediately purged when it's deleted:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20040412-DM02.htm. We do not recommend
running an AV scanner on a mailbox.
Tripp
- Original Message -
From: Bonno
When pasting URLs into the URL Domain Blacklist, it would be
great if there was a deobfuscator button that you could
click to strip out all the garbage and properly insert only
the domain.ext part of the URL. It would also have logic to
try to figure out the true domain of the URL when
While you are at, why not have Imail convert % (ascii code) to real code and
decode it on the fly. There is no reason to have %77 in the urlblacklist
when it is already probably covered in another entry.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
if you are going to use an asp script then why not use ms smtp service to do that
-- Original Message --
From: Bruno Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:43:03 +0100
It would be interesting to allow the recipient
and i'd like to take their
bounced messages and run them off to some temp storage, to be archived, deleted,
and if resolved, (forgiven, etc, these are my friends and neighbors, the more of
them that buy into the coop, the more $ for toys to make us all happy...) or
cleaned up or whatever, i
you can get a hksi template, they are working on that feature right now.
www.hksi.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Zach Boettner
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] Feature Request
, September 08, 2000 10:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Feature Request
I agree:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#1: It's quite difficult to determine how many and which aliases point to
a mail
account when you have thousands
of accounts and thousands of aliases per domain
I agree:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#1: It's quite difficult to determine how many and which aliases point to a mail
account when you have thousands
of accounts and thousands of aliases per domain
I have the same gripe with telephone forwarding. Works well when you
want to forward your
27 matches
Mail list logo
