Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-16 Thread Gerald
It amazes me how subjects morph in here grin. G On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 Gerald said: Just had a few complaints of slow mail to the company I contract for. Had a look at some of the support mail and sure enought -- there are messages taking 3 or 4 days for local delivery. Using IMail 8.x plus

Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
It amazes me how subjects morph in here grin. Actually, this one didn't morph nearly as much as some threads. The first response to the original post in the thread had 4 sentences, including ... make sure that there is only one DNS server listed there That was directly related to the

Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-14 Thread Gerald
Yes. http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/guide/imailug801/Chapter%205%20smtp5.html#186 Look for Domain Name Server address Gerald On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:45:06 -0800 Hien Tran said something about Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue: Is it okay to have two dns servers (both are currently

RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-14 Thread Kevin Bilbee
, February 14, 2004 12:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue Yes. http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/guide/imailug801/Chapter%205 %20smtp5.html#186 Look for Domain Name Server address Gerald On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:45:06 -0800 Hien Tran said something about

Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is it okay to have two dns servers (both are currently working) listed in the smtp settings? We currently list both dns that was provided to us by our T1 provider. In the past, it was recommended to have multiple DNS servers. However, the recommended practice now is to only have one. A good

RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-14 Thread Kevin Bilbee
PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 6:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue Is it okay to have two dns servers (both are currently working) listed in the smtp settings? We currently list both dns that was provided to us

RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-14 Thread Todd Holt
] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 12:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue I was told by imail tech support not to have two. I asked them about the tech note and tech support told me it is better to only have one. They could not say why

Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-14 Thread Matt
] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue I was told by imail tech support not to have two. I asked them about the tech note and tech support told me it is better to only have one. They could not say why. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-14 Thread Matt
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue I was told by imail tech support not to have two. I asked them about the tech note and tech support told me it is better to only have one. They could not say why. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-14 Thread Len Conrad
Apparently, it is OK to have 2 listed, but only the first one will be used. Is their any way to specify a backup DNS server to IMail? I never understood the advantage of Imail having its own single DNS setting, independent of the ordered list of DNSs accepted by the Windows resolver. I think

Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
I looked in the spool directory and there are 13,000+ files in spool AND another 13,000+ in spool/overflow -- OUCH! Is the CPU usage at 100%? If so, you're probably experiencing a very high volume of E-mail. If not, you should check your DNS settings in the SMTP section of IMail

Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-13 Thread Gerald
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:51:53 -0500 R. Scott Perry said something about Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue: I looked in the spool directory and there are 13,000+ files in spool AND another 13,000+ in spool/overflow -- OUCH! Is the CPU usage at 100%? If so, you're probably experiencing a very

RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-13 Thread Kevin Bilbee
CAn your box make any outbound connections??? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerald Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:51:53 -0500 R. Scott

Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-13 Thread Gerald
Yep -- just dropped to a command prompt and did a telnet to port 25 on my own mail server (where these emails are sent from, at home, on a cable connection). Gerald On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:34:43 -0800 Kevin Bilbee said something about RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue: CAn your box make any

RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-13 Thread Kevin Bilbee
relay or relay for addresses??? Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerald Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue Yep -- just dropped to a command prompt

RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
: RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue Did you test Scotts DNS question. Can yo do queries from that box to the DNS that is in imail. Try a NSLOOKUP setting the dns server to the one setup in imail. Are the messages in the queue legitimate email or have you been hijaked??? Is your server

Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-13 Thread Gerald
failed lookups on the bad server before going over to the good server. Thanks all. Gerald On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:03:24 -0800 Kevin Bilbee said something about RE: [IMail Forum] flooded queue: Did you test Scotts DNS question. Can yo do queries from that box to the DNS that is in imail. Try

Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-13 Thread Gerald
And that appears to have been it. Spool/overflow were over 17,000 each when I removed the dead server. They've both dropped under 15,000 in the last 20 minutes. Thanks again. On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:12:26 -0600 (Central Standard Time) Gerald said something about Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue

2004-02-13 Thread Hien Tran
? Is this normal, any thoughts? Thanks. Hien Tran - Original Message - From: Gerald [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 11:30 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] flooded queue And that appears to have been it. Spool/overflow were over 17,000 each when I