Following to the german news on
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/52288
the next Imail version will be released as Collaboration Suite on october
25. So far so good.
But what's about:
The smallest Collaboration Suite license (25 Users, and Bitdefender AV
Engine) will cost 1295 Euro +
200.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
200.1.1.3 255.255.255.255
200.1.1.23 255.255.255.255
200.1.1.25 255.255.255.255
200.1.1.26 255.255.255.255
200.1.1.250 255.255.255.255
200.1.1.251 255.255.255.255
200.1.1.253 255.255.255.255
I want to allow the following to skip
Spamskip.txt is created via the Trusted Addresses tab in V8.1x, so,
yes, this appears to be the only way to specify from the GUI and how
the file is written, when entering a single address. BTW, the
separator between the IP and Mask appears to be a tab, not a space, if
you are editing the file. Be
I used the tab in the imail admin to enter all the addresses just to make
sure.
thanks
Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com
-Original
I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB,
Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us.
(Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB) Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude
on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a better operating
I am trying to clear up a debate about whether or not we are required to
archive our incoming and outgoing email. We are owned by a public company
and we do deal with financial transactions and peoples personal information.
I cannot find a definitive answer on whether or not we have to archive
If you have or can find the resources, archive now and find the answer
later.
If you later find you do not have to, there is a key on your keyboard to
correct what you did.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Carter wrote:
I'm looking to upgrade our Imail box (Dell Optiplex, 600mhz, 256MB,
Win2000). We get about 500K messages a month, so a solid desktop will do us.
(Looking at Dell 3.2GHz, 1GB) Question: Since I only run Imail and Declude
on the box, are there any issues that make XP or Win2000 a
The incoming volume of mail is too high to just channel it to a mailbox and
we have 7 Imail systems that will need to copy mail to an archive server.
I'll keep lookin
Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists)
On Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 14:39:16, Rick Davidson wrote:
I am trying to clear up a debate about whether or not we are required
to archive our incoming and outgoing email. We are owned by a public
company and we do deal with financial transactions and peoples
personal information.
Ask
I expect you to receive a bill for the hour (.667 rounded up). Our last
transaction with our old IP Lawyer was a .5 hour charge for receiving a
voice mail!
Anyhow, it looks to this layman as if your archives may be subpoenaed only
if they exist. So, I changed to killing all logs at 1 week age,
How much actually deals with client info (data that would need to be
archived). We have an account which we email project related emails. We
place a flag (###) where ### is some client number in the Subject line and
an incomming and outgoing filter automagically copies the email to this
account.
The only reason we chose server over workstation was our antivirus insisted
upon it.
.rick..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bud Durland
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] upgrading
I have Imail installed on a Dell server with Win2000SRV for Primary. Same
hardware but WinXP Pro (not my idea) for the backup server. The main
server, on the same hardware, is almost twice as fast at
Declude/Fprot/Imail. Neither box runs anything else continually (the backup
has a program that
I bet no one out ther was expecing that answer!
what does you AV have to do with choosing the proper OS. Correct me if I am
wrong but there is AV software available for all Windows versions.
If your AV insists on workstation hten chang AV products. Use the proper
tool for the job. I caught my 6
Anyhow, it looks to this layman as if your archives may be
subpoenaed only if they exist. So, I changed to killing all logs at
1 week age, and archive nothing.
SOX 802 specifically provides for prison time for deletion of data in
contemplation of matters that _are not yet under_
I am trying to clear up a debate about whether or not we are
required to archive our incoming and outgoing email. We are owned by
a public company and we do deal with financial transactions and
peoples personal information. I cannot find a definitive answer on
whether or not we
Ask someone authoritative in your parent company (get in in writing).
contact the evil empire?
Then do what they say.
shiver
:-)
We try to stay completely autonomous from the parent company, not sure of
the details but there were some anti-trust issues not too long ago.
Sandy,
thanks for the
Dear List,
My server is having problems delivering email to just one specific mail
server. I can see that this server (64.202.166.12) had blakclisted my
server, perhaps because it does not pass some helo checks.
I have reviewed my configurations, and they look Ok: relay only for my
local
Is there something that I am overlooking, or perhaps It's just some
misconfigurations in that server's anti-spam system?
It's probably something on their end:
10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) EHLO mail.webjogger.net
Your EHLO is fine. But:
10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10:18
10:18 13:22 SMTP-(085C0101) 553 204.8.81.2 mail rejected due to
excessive spam (bogus helo matches rcpt aile@)
The 'bogus helo' message may be irrelevant. What about the 'excessive
spam' part? Have you searched your logs for 'aile@'? When you say
'relay only for my local
Relay for local addresses, yippie, I can send out spam through your server.
Oh, and hey, they will be confused because you have 4 MX records pointing at
the same IP address. Even better, the PTR never matches the A record nor the
HELO.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
Hi Dan,
Sandy's post referes to this, if your a private company its probly ok, but
its still best practice to keep a log history in case you need to cover your
rear
Sec. 802(a) Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals,
covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record,
Scott,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
I will contac the net administrator in that company, sometimes it is tough
to talk about these kind of misconfigurations, and get a good response. I
will give it a try.
Regards
Mario Antonio
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL
Sandy,
Thanks for your comments. I will look for that string in my logs.
Yes, (The SMTP security Tab in Imail) I relay mail just for our block of IP
Addresses (our customers)
Regards
Mario Antonio
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mario Antonio [EMAIL
Even better, the PTR never matches the A record nor the HELO.
Actually:
10.4.18.64.in-addr.arpa name = webjogger.net.mail1.psmtp.com
(That's for the MXs. The first hostname does match up, but the use of
an outsourced MX provider is not related to the sending issues, in any
case.)
As
John,
Those configs are for incoming email (Postini stuff), Perhaps I am wrong but
in the case of outgoing email, what matters is the PTR records of the host
sending email.
Regards
Mario Antonio
- Original Message -
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey John,
If you are speaking of using a desktop operating system for your IMail box, I HIGHLY
recommend against it. If you are using a desktop OS now, that is probably why your
performance might be degrading.
You could actually take your existing box, upgrade the RAM (and hard drive if
True, but some mail servers are testing to see if settings match.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mario Antonio
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:37 PM
To:
Hi,
Prasad brings it to the point. Use Windows 2003 Server, at least double the memory and
your IMail
server will be happy for the rest of its live.
Am Mittwoch, 20. Oktober 2004 um 00:05 schrieben Sie:
Hey John,
If you are speaking of using a
30 matches
Mail list logo
