RE: [IMail Forum] Update on IMail 2006.02...

2006-01-26 Thread Sean Kenworthy
02 doesnt specifically address the problem. However, what we found is that there is a main listed in the News.rc file in the user directory. This is what Imap uses to know what folders the user is subscribed to. There are two ways to get rid of it: 1) Delete Main from news.rc OR 2) have

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.01

2005-12-22 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Its a full install and can be used as an upgrade or as a brand new install. -Sean From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 10:25 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.01 Is

RE: [IMail Forum] Small Bug / Inconvenience when changing a user's password

2005-12-02 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Thanks Jeff. This is a bug and Ill get it entered into our bug tracking system. -Sean Kenworthy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 10:17 AM To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: [IMail Forum] Small Bug

RE: [IMail Forum] Log file size 5 times bigger after upgrade to 8.20

2005-05-04 Thread Sean Kenworthy
We added a lot more logging in SMTP processing for Verbose. If you don't need all the extra logging you can turn off Verbose and Debugging under the SMTP service tab. -Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Deslauriers Sent: Tuesday,

RE: [IMail Forum] New, undocumented, log file?

2005-05-02 Thread Sean Kenworthy
This is a known bug. The attachment blocking code sometimes doesn't update it's log file date when the date changes causing it to write to a previous days log file. -- Original Message -- From: Brad Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To:

RE: [IMail Forum] nobody alias seems dead

2005-04-28 Thread Sean Kenworthy
I had no problem getting the NOBODY alias to work using ODBC. Are you still having problems? -Sean From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Tech SupportSent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 7:51 AMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] nobody

RE: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] odbc and 8.2

2005-04-28 Thread Sean Kenworthy
We're working on getting the source update to the FTP site. Sorry for any inconvenience. -Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford Whiteman Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 1:26 PM To: Mike Nice Subject: Re[2]: [IMail Forum] odbc and

Re: [IMail Forum] domain aliases

2005-04-28 Thread Sean Kenworthy
We have identified a problem with using mixed case in the host the domain aliases. We are working quickly to fix this problem but for now if the user(s) having the problem will make sure to use all lower case in their SMTP AUTH and you should make sure your domain alias is saved as all lower

RE: [IMail Forum] question about 8.14 patch

2004-11-12 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Yes that is correct. can't be delivered to anyone and in the past IMail would accept the message but the then bounce it later. Now it rejects the recipient immediately. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Ivey Sent: Friday,

RE: [IMail Forum] OT- Recommended Registrars

2004-10-22 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Title: OT- Recommended Registrars I'll second that. I use them often and like them a lot. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of L. BhandariSent: Friday, October 22, 2004 2:07 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] OT- Recommended Registrars I use

RE: [IMail Forum] Unsubscribe from List

2004-10-04 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Try this: Send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body, on the first line put: Unsubscribe imail_Forum Your Name Make sure the address you are sending from is the same exact same address that you are subscribed with. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [IMail Forum] Peering with Exchange 2003

2004-08-13 Thread Sean Kenworthy
You can Peer with exchange if you have 8.04 or later. Here is the KB article on it. http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20031209-DM01.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Don Wolff Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 8:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [IMail Forum] IMAIL Antispam Mysteriously became ineffective

2004-08-04 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Are you running any of the other checks? URL Black lists, Connection black lists, the Phrase lists, or the features checks?Statistical typically is the last line in the defense arsenal, so it would appear you might not be running other checks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [IMail Forum] Still see SMTPD32 memory leak in 8.12

2004-06-16 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Are you using the IMail Blacklist checks or any of the other connection filtering? If so which ones? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Davidson Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 4:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum]

RE: [IMail Forum] LDAP extreme basic question

2004-06-11 Thread Sean Kenworthy
What do you have your search base set to in Outlook? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Wilkins Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 10:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] LDAP extreme basic question We are a small shop too

RE: [IMail Forum] LDAP extreme basic question

2004-06-11 Thread Sean Kenworthy
on additional search base strings. Scott Wilkins IT Manager Tedford Insurance Phone: 918.299.2345 Direct: 918.296.2913 Fax: 918.296.3346 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Kenworthy Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 9:37 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: [IMail Forum] Does phrase filter search subjects? Imail 8.05

2004-05-28 Thread Sean Kenworthy
In 8.1 it will search subjects and bodies. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mike Biddle Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Does phrase filter search subjects? Imail 8.05 Does the phrase filter

RE: [IMail Forum] Error from Virus scan server, code = 1

2004-05-28 Thread Sean Kenworthy
IMail AV is Symantec's Carrier Scan product which operates over TCP as a service. If IMail can't open a connection to the scanner it will fail to connect and return Error=1. When this happens run a netstat and see if large amounts of ports are open. if this is the case see if there is a

RE: [IMail Forum] LDAP Vulnerability?

2004-05-10 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Open the release notes. It will say in the first line of the notes what verion is installed. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of A. Clausen Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 2:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] LDAP Vulnerability?

RE: [IMail Forum] IMAP Serve wouldn't let go a mailbox

2004-05-07 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Would it be possible for one of you having this problem to send me a packet trace of the IMAP session off list? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Hermann Strassner Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 4:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail

RE: [IMail Forum] DAMN LDAP EXPLOIT! Take it seriously

2004-05-07 Thread Sean Kenworthy
No it's not the same. The exploit is with the old LDAP service in pre-8.1 implementations. The current implementation was not interweaved into the old LDAP code. It completely replaced it. I would suggest that any patch that fixes any exploit, no matter how it's worded in the release notes,

RE: [IMail Forum] DAMN LDAP EXPLOIT! Take it seriously

2004-05-07 Thread Sean Kenworthy
This problem was in the 2.0.7 build and prior. IMail is using build 2.1.22. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Klinge Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 10:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] DAMN LDAP EXPLOIT! Take it

RE: [IMail Forum] Scan Engine password forgotten!

2004-04-29 Thread Sean Kenworthy
You have to reinstall AV to reset it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sean Diana Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 9:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Scan Engine password forgotten! Is it the default or has it been

RE: [IMail Forum] (Exact list of) Word seperators for Phrase list (Content Filtering)?

2004-04-19 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Title: Message Can you post one or two emails that through? Please include the headers for each one. -Sean -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of RMilnerSent: Monday, April 19, 2004 3:12 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]

RE: [IMail Forum] Any positive experience with v8.1?

2004-04-15 Thread Sean Kenworthy
It's a DWORD -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vincent Toussaint Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Any positive experience with v8.1? Have you enter it as DWORD value, String value or

RE: [IMail Forum] Service Survery

2004-04-13 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Really? In what capacity do you use them? Are they just running or do you actively populate them with data and people query against them? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Oliver Madsen Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 2:19 PM To:

RE: [IMail Forum] Issues with Queue Manager / Delivery of Mail

2004-04-08 Thread Sean Kenworthy
8.05 Hotfix 3 is out now and should take care of this issue for you. http://www.ipswitch.com/support/imail/releases/imail_professional/index.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Miguel Jamous Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: [IMail Forum] 8.10 Install Problem

2004-04-08 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Sounds like some files were in use when you did the upgrade. Did it ask you to reboot after it was finished upgrading? -Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chris Moore Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [IMail Forum] Slow IMAP

2004-04-08 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Hotfix 2 fixes the mailbox lock problem. -Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 4:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Slow IMAP I did. Mine was actually a result of a

RE: [IMail Forum] CWM Templates after 8.1 upgrade

2004-04-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Reinitialize your LDAP database. In fact use the Init button from the LDAP service tab not the one under the host's LDAP tab. -Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:44 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 8.10 Release

2004-04-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Yes, numbers are normalized out. So G1RLS becomes GRLS. -Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 3:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 8.10 Release

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.10 and LDAP

2004-04-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Templates after 8.1 upgrade Just curious was does the Init LDAP actually do? Just re-make the LDAP DB? Travis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Kenworthy Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 6:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE

RE: [IMail Forum] IMail Anti-Virus Premium Edition

2004-04-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Premium edition allows you to setup one server with Premium AV running and then point multiple IMail servers at it to check for viruses. Note: You need to buy the correct user license to cover the total number of users scanned for all servers pointed at the AV scanner server. -Sean

RE: [IMail Forum] CWM Templates after 8.1 upgrade

2004-04-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] CWM Templates after 8.1 upgrade Just curious was does the Init LDAP actually do? Just re-make the LDAP DB? Travis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Kenworthy Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 6:01

RE: [IMail Forum] New X Header After v8.1 upgrade

2004-04-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
It means the message with ID # 7176011000e68545 contained the word free which was found in your Phrase list and was therefore trapped as spam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Travis Rabe Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 2:52 PM To: Imail User

RE: [IMail Forum] Recommended setting for this new feature

2004-04-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
This is correct and I would add that if you don't want it to do this process then you can set the key to 0 which will turn it off. However, leaving it on can help increase performance especially on busy servers. This is because the mailbox doesn't have to be re-written each time someone

RE: [IMail Forum] Phrase list blocking

2004-03-25 Thread Sean Kenworthy
for you - please let me know :)... Maybe I am just stupid and overlooked something, but it definitely doesn't work here :(... -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Sean Kenworthy Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. März 2004 22:35 An: [EMAIL

RE: [IMail Forum] Phrase list blocking

2004-03-24 Thread Sean Kenworthy
IMail does catch anchor tags with hard line breaks between the A and HREF. It also catches upper case tags, lower case or mixed case. If you know of a specific example of when it doesn't catch these email, please post them. Also, it's not entirely true that the phrase list doesn't check HTML

RE: [IMail Forum] Phrase list blocking

2004-03-24 Thread Sean Kenworthy
be compared against the html filters. Is that also why urls in plain text email spam do not get caught by the url blacklist because there are no html tags? Doug - Original Message - From: Sean Kenworthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 3:34 PM Subject

RE: [IMail Forum] OT: Cisco Router Bandwidth

2004-02-26 Thread Sean Kenworthy
There are a few things you can do. The simplest is to setup Priority Queues based on the type of traffic you want to get delivered first. This by itself likely won't get you what you want. You need to go to the Cisco Docs CD or look it up on Cisco's website how to implement Rate Limits based

RE: [IMail Forum] Failed to connect to service IMail 8.04 Why?

2003-11-13 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Does it ever connect to a BL or does it only happen every once in a while? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shmuel Maruani Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 2:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Failed to connect to service

RE: [IMail Forum] Failed to connect to service IMail 8.04 Why?

2003-11-13 Thread Sean Kenworthy
I meant to say does it never connect... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sean Kenworthy Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 9:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Failed to connect to service IMail 8.04 Why? Does it ever

RE: [IMail Forum] Carrier Scan Problems

2003-11-13 Thread Sean Kenworthy
The carrier scan service will only Bind to one IP and that IP is listed in the symcscan.cfg config file. That IP address must match what is listed in the Iadmin-Antivirus tab. If the IP addresses don't match IMail can't communicate with Carrier Scan and will re-queue the mail thus backing

RE: [IMail Forum] Install 8.03 full version over 8.01 ??

2003-10-30 Thread Sean Kenworthy
The full Install will stop any running services, install the new files and services, and then restart what was previously started. To answer to your question, yes, run the installer and let it install over top of 8.01. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [IMail Forum] And: Symantec Antivirus doesnt work with the / silent switch...

2003-08-14 Thread Sean Kenworthy
You can also make a BAT file that calls "cslive.exe /silent" and then call the bat file from the scheduled tasks in the control panel. That seems to make it easier. the cmd /c cslive.exe /silent will usually work as well. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [IMail Forum] And: white list

2003-08-14 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Put their IP address(s) into the Trusted IP Addresses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Imail/Admin Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 4:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] And: white list Is there a way to have imail8 anti

RE: [IMail Forum] Which version of KillerWebmail is compatible with Imail 8.0

2003-08-14 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Yes. 4.01 is the latest and supports all the new features of 8.0. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Imail/Admin Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Which version of KillerWebmail is

RE: [IMail Forum] Why does the Anti-Spam 'per word filter' scan encoded attachment text?

2003-08-14 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Not true. All of IMail's 8.0x Anti-spam features decode Base64 and Quoted Printable messagesbefore checking the message. Also, it does intelligent HTML parsing so when spammers break up words with html comments like HE!--kjsdkjll--RE, IMail will put the words back together so it can check

RE: [IMail Forum] Phrase Filtering versus URL Domains

2003-08-14 Thread Sean Kenworthy
URL Blacklisting and phrase filtering is done concurrently. As the message is read it checks it against the URL black list. If no match is found in the URL Black list, AND it has enough of the message read, it hands that portion off to the Phrase Filtering to check for banned phrases.

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.01 antivirus Sean?

2003-08-04 Thread Sean Kenworthy
If you are using IMail Antivirus it operates at the IP level. It's the first thing that is performed on the message. It is only per IP host scanning. The settings for the Antivirus apply to the mail server as a whole. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam updates overwrite?

2003-08-04 Thread Sean Kenworthy
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sean Kenworthy Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 1:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam updates overwrite? A nice, easy method of populating the URL Blacklist table, (which has been catching some 60% of the spam for me

RE: [IMail Forum] V8 Anti spam for virtual domains

2003-08-04 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Title: Message Yes. If all virtual domains are using the primary Domain's IP addy, they will inherit all AntiSpam properties of the Primary domain. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark GordonSent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:47 AMTo:

RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam updates overwrite?

2003-08-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
which already exists. not mean it's going to overwrite the files I already have? It sure did look that way. http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20030513-DM01.htm Thanks for the reponse, Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sean Kenworthy

RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam updates overwrite?

2003-08-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
. This is a different subject entirely. It's used by Statistical filtering. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sean Kenworthy Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam updates overwrite

RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam updates overwrite?

2003-08-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
than use the antispamseeder. Thanks, Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sean Kenworthy Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 8:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam updates overwrite? I just re-read your original

RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam updates overwrite?

2003-08-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Domain Blacklist directly or not. Thanks for all the info. Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sean Kenworthy Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam updates overwrite? A nice

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.01 dns blacklist

2003-08-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
No. I was just explaining how you can do things programmatically without using the GUI. Connection filtering is handled at the IP level. If you have some domains that need different blacklists, and you have a couple of IP addresses on the mail server, you can set different settings for each

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.01 dns blacklist

2003-08-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
If you only have 1 IP address then you can only use one set of black lists. KWM is owned by Ipswitch so you can contact sales to get an upgrade. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stib Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:28 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.01 dns blacklist

2003-08-01 Thread Sean Kenworthy
If you have 1 IP address then every domain will use that set of black lists. I've never seen the box but it sounds like it's telling you they are available if you want them. Here is the link for KWM. http://www.ipswitch.com/Products/IMail_Server/killer_web.html -Original Message-

RE: [IMail Forum] Antispam updates overwrite?

2003-07-31 Thread Sean Kenworthy
The install should not overwrite any of your spam files. What are you reading in the instructions where they tell you to do overwrite the files? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Forbes Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 12:12 PM To:

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8.01 dns blacklist

2003-07-31 Thread Sean Kenworthy
spamblkm.txt located in the root of IMail, stores the master list of BLs available to the Domains. spamblks.txt located in the top directory of each domain, holds the black lists the Domain will use to check against. Any domains listed in spamblks.txt MUST be located in the spamblkm.txt or it

RE: [IMail Forum] V8 Spam Filtering

2003-07-30 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Yes, anyone who SMTP Authenticates will not be checked for spam. You can force Authed people to be checked for content spam by enabling the option, but that's turned off by default. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joshua Levitsky Sent:

RE: [IMail Forum] V8 Spam Filtering (Modified Question)

2003-07-30 Thread Sean Kenworthy
By default the connection filtering action is to insert an x-header into the message so you could write a rule to copy all mail with the header X-IMail-Spam to a mailbox. This way you can test things without affecting your users. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [IMail Forum] rules.ima - mortgage rates

2003-07-17 Thread Sean Kenworthy
If you are using IMail 8.x you can put Mortgage Rates into the Phrase Filtering system and use the White List to exclude Bank of America from the Spam checks. If you are using IMail 7.x and are using the rules add a rule to the top of the list where if it's from Bank of America move to mailbox

RE: [IMail Forum] Phrase filtering settings do not stay

2003-07-17 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Make sure the permissions on the phrase-list.txt file in the top directory of that domain are set to allow write access by IAdmin and Queue Manager. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Joe ScharbroughSent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:58

RE: [IMail Forum] iMail version 8.0 8.01

2003-07-10 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Download 8.01 Hotfix 1. It should fix you problem. http://www.ipswitch.com/Support/IMail/patch-upgrades.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mr Gregory DeClue Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 10:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail

RE: [IMail Forum] Anti-spam administration v8

2003-07-10 Thread Sean Kenworthy
There is no equivalent Badheaders check in IMail antispam. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Katie La Salle-Lowery Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Anti-spam administration v8 Hi all, I just

RE: [IMail Forum] Phrase Filtering will not Enable

2003-07-09 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Look in the spam logs. Do you see any errors? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom Pepper Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:09 PM To: IMAIL List Subject: [IMail Forum] Phrase Filtering will not Enable When I attempt to enable phrase

RE: [IMail Forum] Phrase Filtering will not Enable

2003-07-09 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Check the permissions on the Phrase-list.txt. It's in the domain's directory. Make sure the system and the logged in User can read/write/create it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tom Pepper Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:45 PM To:

RE: [IMail Forum] Question about the spam filter in version 8.0

2003-07-08 Thread Sean Kenworthy
It will put an X-header line into the message header and then send it to content filtering. If you have rules set up in the user or domain level to look for X-Imail-Spam-dnsbl or one of the other x-headers it drops, you can then delete it, forward it, copy it somewhere, place into a spam

RE: [IMail Forum] Feature that went away!

2003-06-26 Thread Sean Kenworthy
That feature was added back in 7.14 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of kwl Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 12:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Feature that went away! Still looking for an answer for this. In verion 6.06 I

RE: [IMail Forum] Feature that went away!

2003-06-26 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Sorry, I meant 8.0 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sean Kenworthy Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Feature that went away! That feature was added back in 7.14 -Original Message

RE: [IMail Forum] Undefined labels in KWM4

2003-06-23 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Several things can cause this. One is, Web Messaging can't find the Language pack files or Directory. They should be contained in \web\LanguagePacks Second, you need to allow cookies from the mail server to your browser. Third is the language packs might be corrupt. Fourth, check the

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 8 speed is much better

2003-06-06 Thread Sean Kenworthy
There is no rule of thumb that applies in every case. I will say multi-processors can take advantage of higher numbers of threads. If you get to many threads going your server will begin thrashing about trying to service all the threads, so be careful. You really need to experiment a bit to

RE: [IMail Forum] queuemgr taking all the CPU

2003-05-31 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Check your logs for mail loops. Look for "ERR alias loop in ..." Mail loops on a busy server can cause problems. Also, check your spool dir for large amounts of files, 30K of them or more. When the CPU is spiking, look in the logs to see what users/domains were being delivered to. See if

RE: [IMail Forum] 8.0 Spam and attachments Please advise

2003-05-30 Thread Sean Kenworthy
If the users sending the email authenticate using SMTP AUTHto relay mail, they will not be scanned for spam. Have them AUTH when sending mail. I can't tell without looking at the Spam logs why they were caught, but there is no filtering based solely on HTML being in the message.

RE: [IMail Forum] 8.0 Spam and attachments Please advise

2003-05-30 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Sorry I didn't see that part of the spam log. Then your answer is still SMTP AUTH or putting them in the White list. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Eric ParsonsSent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:02 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail 7.1

2002-05-17 Thread Sean Kenworthy
Tom, Have you done a Netstat do see what kind of traffic and volume of traffic is connecting to your box(s)? You want to see if there are any suspicious IP addys consistantly hammering your box. - Sean -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On

RE: [IMail Forum] Mail to Fax

2002-05-17 Thread Sean Kenworthy
No. Use the original mail to fax for 6.06. Mail to fax does NOT work with Win2k only NT4 -Sean K -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Kratka Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] Mail to Fax

RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade 6.06-7.1 - can't login to web client on ODBC based accounts

2002-05-16 Thread Sean Kenworthy
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bud Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade 6.06-7.1 - can't login to web client on ODBC based accounts On 5/15/02, Sean Kenworthy penned: Bud, Run DBupdate.exe columns.lst from the command line

RE: [IMail Forum] Upgrade 6.06-7.1 - can't login to web client on ODBC based accounts

2002-05-15 Thread Sean Kenworthy
the to columns.lst file. Also make sure the database or tables are not locked when you do this. -- Sean Kenworthy -- Sr. IMail Software QA Engineer -- Ipswitch, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bud Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 9:12 AM To: [EMAIL