Hi
I get lots of e-mails from Sun and yesterday got on about a Dummies Guide to
HPC.
Now whilst the word Solaris occurred twice, once in the list of trademarks
Linux appeared loads of times. Whilst this does show an admirable lack of bias
if Sun don't mention it, would that indicate it is not
Sometimes gnome-terminal does heavy disk-reads when I scroll-back the
buffer with a actually not very big scroll-back size and it doesn't get
less when I scroll the same region. So I guess it's not swapping or
something similar. This also happens with a newly started
gnome-terminal instance.
Anon Y Mous wrote:
NOTE: In my opinion, Indiana snv_129 is an outstanding release and is
pretty much the best OpenSolaris build released so far except for this one
Like you said, it's only an opinion.
Still, if you follow the DEV releases, you can not expect this DEV to be
compatible with
Paul Johnston wrote:
Sun don't mention it, would that indicate it is not even worth
looking at OpenSolaris for HPC?
Just curious!
SUN =! OpenSolaris SUN propagates it's OS while it has not yet released
it's new version based on OpenSolaris. In my experience: what sunOS can
do, OpenSolaris
I had seen that wiki page in the past but it still leaves me as a user
with the questions of whether I can install other drivers and if they
would integrate with boomer (the example being my Terratec DMX24/96 and
the OSS4 driver) or would installation of OSS4 mean I was switching to
standard
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 11:51 +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Sometimes gnome-terminal does heavy disk-reads when I scroll-back the
buffer with a actually not very big scroll-back size and it doesn't get
less when I scroll the same region. So I guess it's not swapping or
something similar.
But it mentions Solaris only once, nevermind OpenSolaris.
Not sure how you would justify producing and distributing something (it must
cost) which doesn't increase exposure to your products.
I would have thought features like zfs and dtrace would be great selling points
and they are mainly Sun
Paul Johnston wrote:
But it mentions Solaris only once, nevermind OpenSolaris.
Not sure how you would justify producing and distributing something (it must
cost) which doesn't increase exposure to your products.
Sun was a very large company (and is now a wholly owned subsidiary of
a much
Hello.
This is most likely your problem: You have your build on /dev, but your
package authority is set to /release. When you try to create a zone, it
checks the main repository, and the entire package doesn't match. Does
that sound reasonable?
~Ted
On 1/28/2010 4:16 AM, dick hoogendijk
On 01/28/10 06:37 AM, Michael Whapples wrote:
I had seen that wiki page in the past but it still leaves me as a user
with the questions of whether I can install other drivers and if they
would integrate with boomer (the example being my Terratec DMX24/96 and
the OSS4 driver) or would
On 01/28/10 04:51 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Sometimes gnome-terminal does heavy disk-reads when I scroll-back the
buffer with a actually not very big scroll-back size and it doesn't get
less when I scroll the same region. So I guess it's not swapping or
something similar. This also
I have asked the question on the opensound-discuss list, hopefully
someone who may be knows boomer in detail will reply.
Michael Whapples
On 01/28/2010 05:43 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 01/28/10 06:37 AM, Michael Whapples wrote:
I had seen that wiki page in the past but it still leaves me as a
On 01/27/10 11:44 PM, Anon Y Mous wrote:
r...@solarisunix:~# zoneadm -z testzone3 install
A ZFS file system has been created for this zone.
Publisher: Using opensolaris.org (http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/ ).
Image: Preparing at /export/zones/testzone3/root.
Cache: Using /var/pkg/download.
I think you may be running into bug 13493.
13493 Cannot install zone if newer version of entire is in repository
If you add the -f option to the pkg list command as suggested in that
bug does this solve the problem?
-evan
On 1/27/10 10:56 PM, Anon Y Mous wrote:
This is the output for my pkg
On 01/28/10 06:44 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 01/28/10 04:51 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Sometimes gnome-terminal does heavy disk-reads when I scroll-back the
buffer with a actually not very big scroll-back size and it doesn't get
less when I scroll the same region. So I guess it's not
On 01/28/10 12:26 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On 01/28/10 06:44 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 01/28/10 04:51 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Sometimes gnome-terminal does heavy disk-reads when I scroll-back the
buffer with a actually not very big scroll-back size and it doesn't get
less when I
On 01/28/10 07:30 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 01/28/10 12:26 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On 01/28/10 06:44 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 01/28/10 04:51 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Sometimes gnome-terminal does heavy disk-reads when I scroll-back the
buffer with a actually not very big
On 01/28/10 12:35 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On 01/28/10 07:30 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 01/28/10 12:26 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On 01/28/10 06:44 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 01/28/10 04:51 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Sometimes gnome-terminal does heavy disk-reads when I
This is most likely your problem: You have your build on /dev, but your
package authority is set to /release. When you try to create a zone, it
checks the main repository, and the entire package doesn't match. Does
that sound reasonable?
~Ted
I wish that the problem were that easy. This is
I think you may be running into bug 13493.
13493 Cannot install zone if newer version of entire is in repository
If you add the -f option to the pkg list command as suggested in that
bug does this solve the problem?
-evan
Thanks evan! That's exactly what the problem was. It's amazing that
20 matches
Mail list logo
