On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 08:46:54AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
On 12/29/2014 05:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 01:37:58PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
Dear sysadmin-cvs group,
I have seen after discussing with few members of sysadmin-cvs group
that
they found
On 12/30/2014 02:45 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 08:46:54AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
On 12/29/2014 05:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 01:37:58PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
Dear sysadmin-cvs group,
I have seen after discussing with few
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 02:52:16PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
On 12/30/2014 02:45 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 08:46:54AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
On 12/29/2014 05:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 01:37:58PM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
Dear
PN == Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com writes:
PN In simple words no human is required for processing this request.
Absolutely, categorically untrue.
There are cases when it's OK. Even outside of simple sanity checking,
there are plenty more cases when it's not. Some of those cases (say,
Hi Jason,
On 12/31/2014 01:24 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
PN == Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com writes:
PN In simple words no human is required for processing this request.
Absolutely, categorically untrue.
There are cases when it's OK. Even outside of simple sanity checking,
there are
