Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 13:48:49 +0100 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/07/2015 06:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * We will need to adapt to not giving every instance a floating ip. For copr, I think this would be fine, as you don't care that they have *nod* I was not sure how VM

Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati
Hi guys :), On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: So it would be: # 172.16.0.1/16 -- 172.21.0.1/20- Free to take # 172.23.0.1/16 - free (but used by old cloud) # 172.24.0.1/24 - RESERVED it is used internally for OS # 172.25.0.1/20 - Cloudintern

Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:39:52 +0100 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: So it would be: # 172.16.0.1/16 -- 172.21.0.1/20- Free to take # 172.23.0.1/16 - free (but used by old cloud) # 172.24.0.1/24 - RESERVED it is used internally for OS # 172.25.0.1/20 - Cloudintern

Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 03/07/2015 06:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * We will need to adapt to not giving every instance a floating ip. For copr, I think this would be fine, as you don't care that they have *nod* I was not sure how VM behave when does not have public IP so I tested it. It is basicaly behind NAT and

Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:29:36 +0100 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/07/2015 07:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * I see that the tenants have the same internal 172.16.0.0 net right now, can we make sure we seperate them from each other? ie, I don't want a infrastructure instance

Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 03/09/2015 01:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: nova commands worked fine from here, but I didn't really try and do anything fancy. We could see if the euca stuff will just keep working for us for now. It works fine. It is just that if you miss some functionality (and I miss a lot) and file RFE,

Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 03/07/2015 06:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * Can we adjust the default tennat quotas in the playbooks? They seem a bit low to me given the amount of resources we have. I put (and tested) the quota for Copr (it is on bottom of playbook). Can you please write quotas for other tenants (or you

Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 11:25:20 +0100 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/07/2015 06:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: All thats set and I can see console in the web dash again just fine for any of the instances I tried, and they are all https using only. Works for me too. Nice. Thanks.

Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 03/09/2015 10:29 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: On 03/07/2015 07:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * I see that the tenants have the same internal 172.16.0.0 net right now, can we make sure we seperate them from each other? ie, I don't want a infrastructure instance being able to talk to a copr

Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 13:00:20 +0100 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/07/2015 06:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * Can we adjust the default tennat quotas in the playbooks? They seem a bit low to me given the amount of resources we have. I put (and tested) the quota for Copr (it is

Re: Freeze Break Request: Add more fedmsg endpoints for fedimg

2015-03-09 Thread David Gay
- Original Message - From: Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 10:59:54 AM Subject: Freeze Break Request: Add more fedmsg endpoints for fedimg The fedimg uploader daemon that uploads cloud images to AWS is

Re: Freeze Break Request: Add more fedmsg endpoints for fedimg

2015-03-09 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 from me On Mar 9, 2015 12:02 PM, David Gay d...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 10:59:54 AM Subject: Freeze Break Request: Add more fedmsg endpoints for fedimg

Re: Freeze Break Request: Add more fedmsg endpoints for fedimg

2015-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Sure, +1 kevin pgpxcvwJe9Sx0.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Freeze Break Request: Add more fedmsg endpoints for fedimg

2015-03-09 Thread Ralph Bean
The fedimg uploader daemon that uploads cloud images to AWS is complaining that it doesn't have enough fedmsg endpoints. It needs an endpoint for each worker thread, one for the parent thread, and then twice that number so that the daemon can do work while an admin can run the commands by hand

Freeze break request: Fix pxeboot menu labels

2015-03-09 Thread Ricky Elrod
commit 768e9bd0cc104585e112397109d3ed526678edd2 Author: Ricky Elrod codebl...@fedoraproject.org Date: Mon Mar 9 18:54:38 2015 + Fedora 21 is not Fedora 22 Signed-off-by: Ricky Elrod codebl...@fedoraproject.org diff --git

Re: Freeze break request: Fix pxeboot menu labels

2015-03-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
+1 here pgpTGF7aLo6hh.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure

Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 03/07/2015 07:29 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * I see that the tenants have the same internal 172.16.0.0 net right now, can we make sure we seperate them from each other? ie, I don't want a infrastructure instance being able to talk to a copr builder if we can avoid it. Are you sure?

Re: New OpenStack instance - status

2015-03-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 03/07/2015 06:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: All thats set and I can see console in the web dash again just fine for any of the instances I tried, and they are all https using only. Works for me too. Nice. Thanks. I tried to automatize adding of SSH keys using this: I wonder if we shouldn't