On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 21:05 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 19:46:27 -0800
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > The main problem here is the 'archive' filterlist is still pretty big,
> > over 20MiB. I don't want to push the fedfind changes out to the public
The main problem here is the 'archive' filterlist is still pretty big,
over 20MiB. I don't want to push the fedfind changes out to the public
until it's smaller. With this change the imagelist files are all tiny,
under 250KiB. pr #26 is an alternative to this which just extends the
exclusion list
+1
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> +1 from me!
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> From f55c6f20bc5676f62a50535dbe5c1d1eb74aae4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Kevin Fenzi
>> Date: Mon,
+1 from me!
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> From f55c6f20bc5676f62a50535dbe5c1d1eb74aae4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:42:19 +
> Subject: [PATCH] fix fedora-25-updates-testing to have
From f55c6f20bc5676f62a50535dbe5c1d1eb74aae4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Fenzi
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:42:19 +
Subject: [PATCH] fix fedora-25-updates-testing to have correct f25 references
for bodhi atomic updates composing
---
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016, at 08:42 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> Anyways, there's a higher level question here - you're arguing
> for pinning to Digicert rather than a custom CA. That seems good
> enough, but I think we need a recovery mechanism in case Digicert
> explodes.
>
> So I'd propose pinning