Cool. Looks good to me for after final.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 10/11/18 9:52 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 00:17 +, ke...@scrye.com wrote:
>> +/usr/bin/pg_dump --exclude-table-data users --exclude-table-data
>> tokens --exclude-table-data 'social*' --exclude-table-data sessions
>> -C $DB | /usr/bin/pxz -T4 > /backups/$DB-public-$(date
On 10/12/18 3:50 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> FYI - We are running out of space on copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org:
>
> /dev/vdc1 6.4T 6.4T 75G 99% /var/lib/copr/public_html
>
> This is where repositories are stored. We likely run out of space till
> Monday. Therefore I will add some
Greetings everyone.
I thought I would send a short note on something I put in place before
the freeze. Basically it seems, even though we have SOPs and docs, we
spend a lot of time around release milestones changing files in ansible,
realizing we forgot something and changing another one, etc.
On 10/12/2018 01:14 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 10/12/2018 01:03 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
>> We have 2 +1(assuming that Dusty's vote count for FBR).
>> @dustymabe Can you please push this patch to ansible repo and run playbook?
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>
> I don't think my vote officially
+
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 04:14, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Next Fedora Atomic Host TwoWeek release will be based on F29
> stream and same will be followed in future releases.
> So, building F28 AH artifacts during bodhi run is
> not needed.
>
> Additionally, use testing refs to build image
On 10/12/2018 01:03 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> We have 2 +1(assuming that Dusty's vote count for FBR).
> @dustymabe Can you please push this patch to ansible repo and run playbook?
>
> Thanks in advance!
I don't think my vote officially counts :( - but I will push it once we
get another +1 :)
We have 2 +1(assuming that Dusty's vote count for FBR).
@dustymabe Can you please push this patch to ansible repo and run playbook?
Thanks in advance!
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:15 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> +1 here
>
> kevin
>
> ___
> infrastructure
+1 here
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
+1 here. It's confusing to have them happening. ;)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 10/12/2018 11:54 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 13:43 +0530, Sinny Kumari wrote:
>> Next Fedora Atomic Host TwoWeek release will be based on F29
>> stream and same will be followed in future releases.
>> So, building F28 AH artifacts during bodhi run is
>> not needed.
>
>
On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 13:43 +0530, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> Next Fedora Atomic Host TwoWeek release will be based on F29
> stream and same will be followed in future releases.
> So, building F28 AH artifacts during bodhi run is
> not needed.
Shouldn't we wait until Fedora 29 is released to stop
Dear all,
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for the Fedora 29
Final Release Readiness meeting. This meeting will be held on Thursday,
2018-10-18 at 19:00 UTC.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Final
release of Fedora 29. Please note that this meeting
I reviewed the code and +1
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 09:33, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> Kevin recently saw that pkgs02 is sending emails on commits again. I have
> been a
> first-hand witness of this myself as well.
>
> I'd like to apply the following PR manually and
On 10/12/2018 04:13 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Next Fedora Atomic Host TwoWeek release will be based on F29
> stream and same will be followed in future releases.
> So, building F28 AH artifacts during bodhi run is
> not needed.
>
> Additionally, use testing refs to build image
+1
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 07:52, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This should be my last FBR for now, as with this I tested everything in
> staging, and I believe it works there (SSH pull/push and HTTPS pull, we don't
> have HTTPS push for pagure.io (yet)).
> This basically
Seems sane +1 from me
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:52 PM Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This should be my last FBR for now, as with this I tested everything in
> staging, and I believe it works there (SSH pull/push and HTTPS pull, we don't
> have HTTPS push for pagure.io
Hi all,
This should be my last FBR for now, as with this I tested everything in
staging, and I believe it works there (SSH pull/push and HTTPS pull, we don't
have HTTPS push for pagure.io (yet)).
This basically sets the username for anonymous access to something that would
never be a valid
Hi everybody,
I want to announce that the Anitya 0.13.2 was finally deployed on
staging (https://stg.release-monitoring.org/)
Feel free to test it.
Anitya 0.13.2 will be deployed on production next week if no breaking
issue will be found.
You can see changelog here
FYI - We are running out of space on copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org:
/dev/vdc1 6.4T 6.4T 75G 99% /var/lib/copr/public_html
This is where repositories are stored. We likely run out of space till Monday.
Therefore I will add some space to this
volume from openstack - I plan to add 500
Hi,
Next Fedora Atomic Host TwoWeek release will be based on F29
stream and same will be followed in future releases.
So, building F28 AH artifacts during bodhi run is
not needed.
Additionally, use testing refs to build image artifacts
for updates-testing compose and updates refs to build
21 matches
Mail list logo
