Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 16:16, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 14:51:04 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:37, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > > > > > > But I think the *existence* of this group is still > > > > valid. > > > > > > Sure, so we leave things as

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 14:51:04 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:37, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > > > But I think the *existence* of this group is still > > > valid. > > > > Sure, so we leave things as they are now as far as wikiedit is > > concerned. > > > > The Fedora

Re: FBR bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+

2019-10-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 .. now I found it. On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:19, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I didn't see anything patched on there so I am not sure what to review. > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 09:49, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > [PATCH] bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+ > >

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 14:37, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > But I think the *existence* of this group is still > > valid. > > Sure, so we leave things as they are now as far as wikiedit is > concerned. > > The Fedora Join process should help reduce the number of wikiedit > membership requests, but

Re: FBR bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+

2019-10-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 02:19:00PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I didn't see anything patched on there so I am not sure what to review. git-send-email always for some reason sends the actual patch as a followup. So, look for the first followup to the orig message in the thread... kevin

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 10:42:49 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:42 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > > Is only editing the wiki a role nowadays? > > Potentially. > > > There is no community group > > around wiki-editing, no team, no SIG. > > So? So who provides resources to

Re: FBR bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+

2019-10-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
I didn't see anything patched on there so I am not sure what to review. On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 09:49, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > [PATCH] bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+ > ___ > infrastructure mailing list --

Re: FBR bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+

2019-10-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:46:53AM -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: > [PATCH] bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+ +1 here. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[PATCH] bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+

2019-10-29 Thread Dusty Mabe
This is a fixup for d7713e6 where mulit-arch was enabled. --- roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/pungi.rpm.conf.j2 index

FBR bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+

2019-10-29 Thread Dusty Mabe
[PATCH] bodhi-pungi: only run multi-arch SB on f31+ ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: ansible-report git hook design

2019-10-29 Thread Clement Verna
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 18:42, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 02:33:02PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 19:04 +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > > > I think the main reason why we don't already have it on Pagure is > > > that we don't want to be dependent of our own

Re: Wikiedit FAS group and Fedora Join new workflow

2019-10-29 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 14:39:20 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:38 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > I am not sure we can retire the existing group unless we contact all of > > the members and ask them to go through the new process thought right? Yes. We'd have to send out an

Re: Fwd: CPE Weekly Update: 2019-10-25

2019-10-29 Thread Michal Konecny
Hi, Badges are currently being worked on by few people from design team, but they want to have more than one maintainer for the application, so the changes are not blocked by only one person. In current situation, there is no risk of Badges being dropped. Regards, Michal On 2019-10-26