On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 01:39:47PM +0200, Timothée Floure wrote:
> I still need to handle a few cases (e.g. subpackages) but everything
> looks good so far. Generating the whole static website is quite fast
> (minutes including repository metadata sync, seconds otherwise).
>
> Screenshot attached
Greetings.
we are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 32
Final release. This is a final release freeze.
We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to
release Fedora 32 when it's available.
You can see a list of hosts that do not freeze by checking out
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 04:54:37PM +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Il 09/04/20 18:49, Mattia Verga ha scritto:
> >
> > I haven't found package "reg" in pagure...
> >
> Ah, I see "docker-reg" has been obsoleted by docker-distribution...
It's this one:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/reg
And
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 1:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 12:54 -0400, James Cassell wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
[snip]
> > > >
> > > > I'm assuming you're using pagure.io - at
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 12:35, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 04:55:20PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> >
> > We finally pushed it to Fedora's staging environment. Please try it
> > using https://geoip.stg.fedoraproject.org/city if you have a chance.
>
> It seems to have only IPv4
On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 12:54 -0400, James Cassell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > > > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not
Il 09/04/20 18:49, Mattia Verga ha scritto:
>
> I haven't found package "reg" in pagure...
>
Ah, I see "docker-reg" has been obsoleted by docker-distribution...
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
Il 09/04/20 02:50, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> The following packages showed up on the orphan list (for being FTBFS).
>
> We use and should take these over:
>
> pam_url
> python-robosignatory
> reg
>
> Any objections to having infra-sig take them?
> (I couldn't figure out how to do this in the
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:55 PM James Cassell
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We actually are. I assume you're asking about
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > >
> > > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using
> > > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 04:55:20PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
>
> We finally pushed it to Fedora's staging environment. Please try it
> using https://geoip.stg.fedoraproject.org/city if you have a chance.
It seems to have only IPv4 address. It provides correct city in
my case, but IPv6 testing
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
> >
> > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using
> > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell)
> > useful to us. There's huge piles
On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 17:58, Justin Forbes wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:41 AM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > >
> > > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using
> > > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:41 AM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
> >
> > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using
> > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell)
> > useful to us. There's huge piles
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
>
> We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using
> packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell)
> useful to us. There's huge piles of existing bash scripts and makefiles
> that achieve about what I
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 01:29:03PM +0100, Martin Kolman wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 09:21 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 08:00:01AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:19:17PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 09:39:46AM
On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 14:47 +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> Jeremy, have you also considered storing everything in a single
> repository? Instead of having two.
>
We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using
packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can
On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 15:19 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 08:27:08PM +, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > The Fedora kernel is moving to maintaining the package in a source
> > (sometimes people refer to it as an "exploded") tree. Basically
> > just a
> > fork of
Jeremy, have you also considered storing everything in a single
repository? Instead of having two.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:27 PM Jeremy Cline wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The Fedora kernel is moving to maintaining the package in a source
> (sometimes people refer to it as an "exploded") tree.
19 matches
Mail list logo
