On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:27 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:15:22PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> >
> > The PR is here https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/795
> > I didn't add it here because I thought (incorrectly?) an FBR wasn't
> needed
> > as this is all
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:15:22PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
>
> The PR is here https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/795
> I didn't add it here because I thought (incorrectly?) an FBR wasn't needed
> as this is all new.
Yeah, thats not freeze breaking, I just thought it would be
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 6:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 05:13:16PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have a dns patch for review.
> >
> > We would like to add a second datanommer db server
> > so that we can migrate the current database to it and
> > make some
On 15/09/21 17:38, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:49:21PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
>
>> +# this is a hotfix hack to work around the sudden config change in
>> rhbz where the max
>> +# number of bugs returned for a query is 20
>> +# it seems to be working for
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 05:13:16PM +0100, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a dns patch for review.
>
> We would like to add a second datanommer db server
> so that we can migrate the current database to it and
> make some changes such as adding the timescaledb
> plugin to improve
On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 12:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> +1 from sysadmin-main smoogen
thanks for doing reverse DNS.
>
> On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 12:13, Mark O'Brien wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have a dns patch for review.
> >
> > We would like to add a second datanommer db server
> >
+1 from sysadmin-main smoogen
On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 12:13, Mark O'Brien wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a dns patch for review.
>
> We would like to add a second datanommer db server
> so that we can migrate the current database to it and
> make some changes such as adding the timescaledb
>
Hi All,
I have a dns patch for review.
We would like to add a second datanommer db server
so that we can migrate the current database to it and
make some changes such as adding the timescaledb
plugin to improve performance. This second server would
allow the migration to happen without affecting
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:49:21PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> +# this is a hotfix hack to work around the sudden config change in
> rhbz where the max
> +# number of bugs returned for a query is 20
> +# it seems to be working for now but may need more work going forward
>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 01:12:07PM -, Kamil Páral wrote:
> > For now, I've kept the limit to 20 because I was having trouble getting
> > more than 20
> > to work for me.
>
> For anyone interested - we found out that only logged-in users can receive
> more than 20 responses per query. For
> For now, I've kept the limit to 20 because I was having trouble getting more
> than 20
> to work for me.
For anyone interested - we found out that only logged-in users can receive more
than 20 responses per query. For anonymous queries, the max limit is 20. I had
a bugzilla token configured,
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 08:01:40PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Over the last weeks we prepared adding CentOS Stream to Fedora's
> MirrorManager instance and are now at a point where we would like to
> push the changes to ansible.
>
> The current state can be seen at:
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
