Re: on rpms

2022-05-31 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Mon, 30 May 2022 at 21:26, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 11:20 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > Dne 23. 05. 22 v 20:57 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > > However, now a days we have a number of new apps that are deployed in > > > openshift and aren't using rpms, but pip or s2i or

Announcing sqlalchemy-helpers

2022-05-31 Thread Aurelien Bompard
Hey folks! A few months ago I started a library to share some boilerplate code in our applications when it comes to SQLAlchemy. Remember the thread about Flask and SQLAlchemy

Re: on rpms

2022-05-31 Thread Aurelien Bompard
> The bigger problem is that those applications are *not* able to easily > be deployed outside of Fedora infrastructure. One consequence of > OpenShift based deployments is that it's become almost too easy to > assume nobody else would ever want to run that code. Because of this, it becomes hard

Re: on rpms

2022-05-31 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 06:24:10PM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Something like: > >> > >> Applications in Fedora Infrastructure may be deployed via non rpm > >> methods (as long as they obey licensing guidelines ( > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Licensing )). For those >