Re: The fedora 38 report

On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 9:12 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Hey everyone. > > Fedora 38 is scheduled to go EOL on 2024-05-14 > Thats just a bit less than 2 weeks from today! > > I already moved a bunch of machines to f40 that were f38, but there's > some left: > > These I need to untangle createrepo_c.

Re: Freeze break request: proxy update to point badges.fp.o at Openshift

+1 from me, obviously :) --ryanlerch On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 8:45 PM Aurélien Bompard wrote: > > Hey folks, > > With Ryan we have deployed the refreshed badges stack in prod openshift, > as the badges components are not frozen. However, the proxies are, and > we need to update them to point at

Re: Freeze break request: koji update on builders

+1 On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:48 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 17:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > In the run up to f40 final we were using a koji with a patch to _not_ > > enable the builroot repo when making containers via kiwi plugin. > > This was to fix the fact that

Re: Freeze break request: redirect labs.fp-o to the new labs website

+1 from me —ryanlerch. On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 07:14, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 07:40:11PM GMT, darknao wrote: > > Hi o/ > > > > I would like to retire the old labs.fedoraproject.org website and > redirect it to the new one on the main site at >

Re: Freeze Break request: small koji update for builders

+1 On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 at 06:22, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 4:16 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > I'd like to update koji on builders. > > > > This build ( > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2423765 ) > > > > has added: > > * A fix to make kiwi builds only

Freeze Break Request: update proxies and ipsilon for kerneltest

Working on switching kerneltest over to openshift, and the final step is to update the proxies: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/1872 and then also run the iplison playbook so the oidc config gets copied over to ipsilon. (from the secrets repo) cheers, ryanlerch --

Re: GitLab Grouping and Naming

On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 4:41 PM Fabian Arrotin wrote: > > On 04/08/2023 02:25, Ryan Lerch wrote: > > I just would get a discussion started with the process of > > semi-formalizing the grouping and naming guidelines for the Fedora > > GitLab instance. > > > > C

GitLab Grouping and Naming

I just would get a discussion started with the process of semi-formalizing the grouping and naming guidelines for the Fedora GitLab instance. Currently there are a bunch of groups with subgroups in the main /fedora/ namespace: https://gitlab.com/fedora Depending on how we decide to group, some

Re: clean up on aisle pagure.io

On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 at 07:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hey folks. > > So, a few weeks back I noticed some spam projects on pagure.io. > So, I cleaned up about 165 of them and deactivated 165 spam users. > > Now, I see there's another pile of them. :( > > So, I started to look at cleaning things up

Re: FMN replacement deployment

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 7:55 PM Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Oh yeah one more thing: > > > - How do you see the transition to the new system? We were thinking: > > - move the current FMN to a different URL, such as > > notifications-old.fp.o. It will still be processing messages and > > sending

Re: planet

On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 7:29 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Hey folks. I thought I would open a discussion about fedoraplanet and > possibly some plans for it. > > Right now: > > fedoraplanet.org runs on people02.fedoraproject.org (aka fedorapeople). > To add a blog/rss feed you have to login there and

email / IRC notifications (FMN)

Hi all, I am currently trying to open a UI / UX review of the FMN / Notifications system and just chasing isome raw feedback on how you all get notifications (email / IRC / or otherwise) when developing / packaging / working on Fedora. Please check out the following discussion thread to log your

Re: Bodhi's move to OIDC

On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 at 05:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 06:15:59PM +0100, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Hey folks! > > > ...snip background... > > > > Weirdness aside, I'm wondering if this could hurt people who may run > > the bodhi client CLI on a headless server. The browser

Re: User Documentation

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 4:16 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 05:39:19PM +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote: > > Good Morning! > > > > Just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on where we could place User > > Documentation for websites and tools that fed

User Documentation

Good Morning! Just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on where we could place User Documentation for websites and tools that fedora-infra owns. During the development of Noggin / Fedora Accounts, we created user documentation for Fedora Accounts, and sort of just threw it up on the Fedora Docs

discourse2fedmsg

Hi all, I have been working on the mini-initiative to update and convert discourse2fedmsg to sending fedora messages. see the following ticker for progress on this task: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9576 It previously was developed, but never deployed (and still was sending

Re: Infrastructure and release engineering Documentation

://fedora-infra-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ cheers, ryanlerch On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:29 PM Ryan Lerch wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:39 AM Ryan Lerch wrote: > > > > So thanks from some awesome hard work from @mkonecny, @asaleh, > > @dkirwan, @mobrien, and @nir

Re: Infrastructure and release engineering Documentation

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:39 AM Ryan Lerch wrote: > > So thanks from some awesome hard work from @mkonecny, @asaleh, > @dkirwan, @mobrien, and @nirik all the existing SOPs have been > imported into the new docs.fedoraproject.org repository [1] and can be > viewed on docs.fedor

Re: Infrastructure and release engineering Documentation

] - https://pagure.io/infra-docs-fpo [2] - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/sysadmin_guide/ [3] - https://pagure.io/infra-docs-fpo/issues On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 1:10 PM Ryan Lerch wrote: > > One approach here would be to have several repos (i.e. documents). For > example, we could

Re: Fedora Badges status

-infrastructure/issue/10192 cheers, ryanlerch On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:25 PM Ryan Lerch wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:24 PM SmootherFrOgZ wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:49 AM Ryan Lerch wrote: > >> > >> Just wondering

Re: Fedora Badges -- broader questions

On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 8:36 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > Hey all! I blame infinitely-long Covid-times for this lapse in memory. I > know there was an investigation into moving Fedora Badges to Badgr. Where > did that lead? Did not know about this investigation -- but after poking around badges

Re: Upcoming changes on datanomer/datagrepper

Hi all, Just a heads up that the new version of datagrepper is now up and running in staging at: https://apps.stg.fedoraproject.org/datagrepper2/ And we would love feedback from anyone using the API. (be sure to note the changes that Ant detailed below too) Also, if you are using datagrepper,

Re: Fedora Badges status

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:24 PM SmootherFrOgZ wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:49 AM Ryan Lerch wrote: >> >> Just wondering if there is anyone around here that is actively (or >> semi-actively) maintaining the Fedora Badges system(s). >> >

Fedora Badges status

Just wondering if there is anyone around here that is actively (or semi-actively) maintaining the Fedora Badges system(s). The reason for this query is that we are currently working on the datanommer / datagrepper transition to Fedora Messaging, and Fedora Badges is revealing itself to be a

Re: standard branch names in fedora-infra git repos

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:52 PM Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Hey folks! > >> I think most of the repos just went with GitHub default, which recently >> changed from master to main. >> In Anitya and the-new-hotness I have: >> - master >> - staging >> - production >> The staging and production

Re: Ticket notifications in IRC

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 8:23 PM Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > Hey folks! > > We currently have messages posted on the #fedora-apps and > #fedora-infrastructure IRC channels when there's a ticket change or a > pull-request change. I don't know about the infrastructure channel, but it > makes it

standard branch names in fedora-infra git repos

Looking through the fedora-infra org on github, there seems to be a plethora of different branch names that all roughly cover the same idea. Loosley put, there are a bunch of different ways to name branches for: * develop / dev / main / master * staging / stage * prod / stable Just wondering if

fedocal in tiny-stage

Hi all, Just a heads up that there is now a fedocal machine in tiny-stage if you ever need to develop or fix bugs for fedocal. https://github.com/fedora-infra/tiny-stage I added it and got it working while tracking down a fix for: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10040 cheers,

A Fedora Infra development environment -- tiny-stage

During the development of Fedora Accounts (freeIPA, freeipa-fas, noggin, etc), the AAA development team started work on a collection of Vagrant controlled virtual machines to make it simple to create a dev environment for working on applications that use Fedora Accounts for authentication. It was

Re: status.fp.org concept

What is this link? I didn't see it on the old status when i was re-implementing status https://web.archive.org/web/20210414105928/https://status.fedoraproject.org/ cheers, ryanlerch On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:16 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 03. 05. 21 v 17:18 Stephen John Smoogen

Re: Infrastructure and release engineering Documentation

fra github org might be the way to go, like the source for the Fedora Accounts docs: https://github.com/search?q=topic%3Adocumentation+org%3Afedora-infra=Repositories cheers, ryanlerch On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 9:49 PM Ryan Lerch wrote: > > Count me in. I'm keen to help out with this initiativ

The new Fedora Status is now Live

Hi all! The new Fedora Status page is now live: https://status.fedoraproject.org/ or https://fedorastatus.org/ The source for the new site, and the content is now in the new 'main' branch on: https://github.com/fedora-infra/statusfpo . The old status code still remains in that repo in the

Re: Infrastructure and release engineering Documentation

Count me in. I'm keen to help out with this initiative! cheers, ryanlerch On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 7:44 PM Mark O'Brien wrote: > >> I think it's a good idea to centralize them like this. >> >> Some things are kind of hazy if they are Infrastructure or Release >> engineering, but otherwise I

Re: status.fp.org concept

On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 01:36, Ben Cotton wrote: > I like it overall. I'm a little concerned about the backend. Would it > work better to have "outageStarts" and "outageEnds" timestamps in the > file for each outage so that the person handling it doesn't have to > both with moving the files into

status.fp.org concept

Hi all, I have been working on this ticket for an updated version of status.fedoraproject.org. https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9858 I have come up with a proof of concept that fills all the requirements specified in the the ticket, and looking for feedback / thoughts on this new

Re: account system group deletions

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:27 PM Mark O'Brien wrote: > >> >> Should there be an announcement or at least a ping of other group >> managers just to make sure there are no objections? While unlikely, >> I'm a little concerned that a rogue group manager could cause some >> harm on their way out the

Bodhi 5.7.0 in Staging

The newest version of Bodhi (5.7.0) is now available in staging, and ready to be tested out: https://bodhi.stg.fedoraproject.org/ This minor release of Bodhi comes with a handful of new features and bugfixes, including: Features * Query different Greenwave contexts for critical path

Re: Future of fedora-packages

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 05:39, Clement Verna wrote: > Hi all, > > fedora-packages [0] code base is showing its age. The code base and > the technology stack (Turbogears2 [1] web framework and the Moksha > [2] middleware) is currently not ready for Python3 and I am not > planning to do the work

Re: The future of pkgdb

On Fri., 28 Apr. 2017 at 6:05 pm, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 28.4.2017 v 07:34 Chenxiong Qi napsal(a): > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:29:28AM +0800, Chenxiong Qi wrote: > >>> > >>> On

Re: Bodhi 2.5.0 beta deployed to stg

17 at 11:59:43PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > > > > This release has some exciting new features and bug fixes[0], the > > > > most exciting of which is a theme redesign done by Ryan Lerch. He > > > > put particular focus on the update page, and I think it greatl

Re: [PATCH] - fallback to local FontAwesome fonts in apps.fp.org/global

ce for the font files on https://apps.fedoraproject.org/global/ . It is a last-level fallback, so on the prod systems where the CORS restrictions do not apply, the non-local font file should never be used. cheers, ryanlerch > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 05:26 Ryan Lerch <rle...@redhat.com> wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] - fallback to local FontAwesome fonts in apps.fp.org/global

my browser seemed to automatically detect my > font locally and used that font instead. It was able to display all > FontAwesome glyphs without a problem. Is local('FontAwesome') redundant or > is there a scenario in which it is necessary to use the local font? > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at

Re: [PATCH] - fallback to local FontAwesome fonts in apps.fp.org/global

Just wondering is someone is able to review this one for me! thanks, ryanlerch On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Ryan Lerch <rle...@redhat.com> wrote: > This patch adds a final-level fallback to the FontAwesome font declaration > to use the local version of the Font

[patch] Fix image paths in base config of the planet

Here is a quick patch that corrects the image paths for the heads images for the feeds included by default in the people_base_config file in the planet setup in ansible. cheers, ryanlerch From a3bd3ab1c55efa98550e39f0ca803f602d1cc84e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ryan Lerch <rle...@redhat.

Re: Making hacking on fedora-apps quicker and simpler

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Ryan Lerch <rle...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:37:11AM +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote: >> >As a designer, when

Re: Making hacking on fedora-apps quicker and simpler

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:37:11AM +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote: > >As a designer, when I jump into doing a UI review, or hacking on the > >templates / CSS of a new project, one of t

Making hacking on fedora-apps quicker and simpler

As a designer, when I jump into doing a UI review, or hacking on the templates / CSS of a new project, one of the most painful steps for me is getting my dev environment set up. Most of our webapps do have very good documentation on getting a dev environment set up, but invariably this takes a

Re: Technical debt fighting week, round #2

On 09/03/16 02:26, Ralph Bean wrote: On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:21:20PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: To keep people motivated and involved, we will do a short (<15minutes) daily-meetup on #fedora-admin at 16:00 UTC. Feel free to join there as well, it will be a good place to sync up work

FAS3

HI all! Just wondering if there has been any recent work on the new FAS lately. I am interested in jumping in and helping out from a UX perspective. cheers, ryanlerch ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Askbot: Where are the theme changes?

On Sun 25 Aug 2013 13:50:04 EDT, Kévin Raymond wrote: Hi Ralph, If you can meet Ryan at Flock (not sure both of you would be there) could you catch him and see if he can finally kick off this theme? If not, could you please let me finish it? Hi shaiton, Ryan and I didn't touch base about it